Showcase for Your HCWP's

Raghu Kuvempunagar

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2016
Messages
2,890
Location
India
Format
Multi Format

fgorga

Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2015
Messages
801
Location
New Hampshire
Format
Multi Format
Things have been slow in this thread so here are a few salted-paper prints I made yesterday.

All are on 8x10 inch Hahnemühle Platinum Rag and the images are 6x7.5 inches or 6.5 inches square.

"The Back Door" (untoned)



The Back Door (gold/bicarbonate toned)


MacDowell Dam (gold/bicarbonate toned)


Bottles (gold/bicarbonate toned)
 

FotoD

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2020
Messages
396
Location
EU
Format
Analog
Very nice salt prints! Thanks for sharing.
 
OP
OP

nmp

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2005
Messages
2,044
Location
Maryland USA
Format
35mm
fgorga said:
Thank you both for the kind words.
Click to expand...

Yeah, wonderful prints and images., Frank. Interesting that the toned prints move almost to cyanotype blues (or is it that my eyes tricking me or may be digital duplication is doing the tricking.)

:Niranjan.
 

fgorga

Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2015
Messages
801
Location
New Hampshire
Format
Multi Format
nmp said:
Yeah, wonderful prints and images., Frank. Interesting that the toned prints move almost to cyanotype blues (or is it that my eyes tricking me or may be digital duplication is doing the tricking.)

:Niranjan.
Click to expand...
Niranjan,

Thanks!

The gold/bicarbonate prints in hand are certainly a neutral, bordering on cool gray. I'm not sure I would go so far as to say they are blue though.
 
Last edited:

t5SQ

Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2024
Messages
21
Location
USA
Format
35mm
One of my first cyanotypes from a silver gelatin negative that I'm pretty happy with. Printed on a 6" by 4.5" sheet of Arches Aquarelle hot press paper.

 

glbeas

Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2002
Messages
3,952
Location
Marietta, Ga. USA
Format
Multi Format
Digital negative from a 4x5 neg scan. Heavy coated van dyke. Finally got good shadow density. Possibly at Hunting Island State Park.
 

glbeas

Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2002
Messages
3,952
Location
Marietta, Ga. USA
Format
Multi Format
I mixed my sensitizer parts 50 percent more concentrated to see what it would do. I would imagine double coating with the stronger solutions will give me even stronger shadows. Anybody else ever try this?
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
24,574
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
Yes, I have, but my observation was that there's very little gain in dmax with double coating and higher concentrations, provided the process is performed under favorable conditions. The main things are to use a suitable paper and a suitable negative.
 
OP
OP

nmp

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2005
Messages
2,044
Location
Maryland USA
Format
35mm
glbeas said:
I mixed my sensitizer parts 50 percent more concentrated to see what it would do. I would imagine double coating with the stronger solutions will give me even stronger shadows. Anybody else ever try this?
Click to expand...

My experience with cyanotype and cuprotype has been that there is an optimum for the sensitizer solids concentration. Too dilute and the sensitizer goes far into the paper, becoming unavailable reduction by UV. Also the spatial density of the image making molecule is low. So the Dmax is low. Increase the concentration, density will go up for a while but then at some point start going down as most of sensitizer stays above the paper fibers which no longer provide anchoring mechanism, resutling in loss of density during develop and washing.

Each paper and process combo have different point at which there is a (Dmax)max, so testing is the key.

:Niranjan.
 

glbeas

Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2002
Messages
3,952
Location
Marietta, Ga. USA
Format
Multi Format
This concentration seems to give a better coating with no speckling with my puddle pusher. I plan on playing with a few other papers I have on hand.
This one is on Stonehenge.
 

glbeas

Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2002
Messages
3,952
Location
Marietta, Ga. USA
Format
Multi Format
One of my papers say it is buffered with calcium carbonate. Should this be washed out with citric acid before I sensitize it? I’m thinking it will kill the tartaric acid in the sensitizer.
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
24,574
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
You can try; I find that Van Dyke isn't as sensitive to chalk buffers in the paper as others. You may see an increase in dmax on an 'acidified' paper, so it's worth a shot.
 

retina_restoration

Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2023
Messages
1,395
Location
Wilammette Valley, Oregon
Format
35mm RF
glbeas said:
One of my papers say it is buffered with calcium carbonate. Should this be washed out with citric acid before I sensitize it? I’m thinking it will kill the tartaric acid in the sensitizer.
Click to expand...

I don’t use any buffered papers for alt process printing. It will almost certainly create issues with your process.
 
OP
OP

nmp

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2005
Messages
2,044
Location
Maryland USA
Format
35mm
glbeas said:
One of my papers say it is buffered with calcium carbonate. Should this be washed out with citric acid before I sensitize it? I’m thinking it will kill the tartaric acid in the sensitizer.
Click to expand...

You are already getting some great results as is. VDB is not well known for the kind of Dmax I see in your images.

In addition to tartaric acid, silver nitrate will also react with the buffer to make silver carbonate and then the process becomes part salt print. I suspect that one of the functions of tartaric acid might as well be to neutralize the paper.

:Niranjan.
 

retina_restoration

Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2023
Messages
1,395
Location
Wilammette Valley, Oregon
Format
35mm RF
nmp said:
You are already getting some great results as is. VDB is not well known for the kind of Dmax I see in your images.
Click to expand...
It seems to me that most of the pale, contrast-deficient VanDyke prints I see are due not to the process itself, but the fact that people are using negatives developed for normal printing/scanning, not developed specifically for alt processes. Negs for VanDyke, Kallitype, Salt, etc. must be processed appropriately to have much denser high values, allowing for blacks to print as "black". If you're getting flat VanDyke prints, it's because your negative isn't right for it.
 

glbeas

Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2002
Messages
3,952
Location
Marietta, Ga. USA
Format
Multi Format
Heres todays efforts. I printed one on my Legion Stonehenge paper
then printed one on a unwashed sheet of Westminster Rag Board and one on a sheet soaked in a citric acid solution. The unwashed is on the left.
The unwashed has a distinct orangy tone while the washed sheet is closer to neutral a slight bit warmer than the Stonehenge. That may be a result of retained moisture even after two hours of drying in a heated drying cabinet. That is pretty thick paper.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…