wiltw
Subscriber
Not enough to matter, less than 0.1EV. But 18% gray is also used as a reproducible 'neutral' standard to assure better reproduction of color hues, and some kinds of clients are extremely picky about color portrayal of their product in ads. So a very slightly 'cool' gray vs a very slightly 'warm' gray as the control color in the photo rather than absolutely 'neutral' can throw off color reproduction of the actual subject.If it can't be guaranteed as a match then I'd have thought that given the ability of the human eye to detect even a small difference in shades ( see my Dulux analogy above ) then if we assume that there might be a small difference in eye detection as opposed to an expensive machine detection can I ask how much difference is this likely to make to an exposure reading
Not enough to matter, less than 0.1EV. But 18% gray is also used as a reproducible 'neutral' standard to assure better reproduction of color hues, and some kinds of clients are extremely picky about color portrayal of their product in ads.
One of the reasons for 'pickiness' is simply the fact that offset press reproduction of photos is more limted in its dynamic range than even transparency photos! Perhaps a 4 stop tonal range (amount actually dependent on the dot matrix 'screen' density). I would rountinely measure the dynamic range of the scene and adjust lighting to all fit within the narrower dynamic range, although the color transparency could support a wider range.Publishers could be very picky about correct chrome exposure. They used light boxes and preferred easily readable 4x5 originals without excessive contrast, and certainly no serious exposure errors, since the color separation process was somewhat lossy. It not like magazines, even the fancy glossy ones, could afford a lot of extra time and fuss. Of course, scanners changed that somewhat; but the original still needs to be reasonably in bounds. But they sure don't pay like they used to.
Use your hand which is usually attached and handy for the reading and then close down one stop.
The palm of my hand always reads Zone VI![]()
What about the palm of local politicians, which are always greased green?
But seriously the best gray card out there is the Sekonic ... what makes it unique is the small patches that make up a full stop of range in 1/6 stop increments. So when you read a result, you can see which chip gave the closest to expected results and can adjust your calibration accordingly to 1/6 stop accuracy.
I've heard there are fifty shades.
Why would anyone need an 18% background?
The Kodak card is the one against the wall and Iāve owned it for years. The $8.95 Mennon set of two cards, 6āX4ā and a 8āX6ā arrived today,
To point out what should be obvious.
A few minutes in the darkroom with a sheet of RC paper and you can turn out as many, and as fancy, grey cards as you want.
The actual reflection density/percent greyness doesn't really matter as long as you use the same card; it becomes your standard.
Then why not use your palm?
This.The actual reflection density/percent greyness doesn't really matter as long as you use the same card; it becomes your standard.
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |