I'm just going to make a statement here as this thread shows how polarized things can get, especially when something like this Hy6, that goes for just south of 10 grand for basic kit, is the hero and the enemy all at once.
I do not own it, nor will I ever, have no idea what it handles like and what quirks it has (and surely it does, like every other camera).
When a company, any company, decides to market a product that is priced for successful "dentists", it MUST have zero problems right out of the box. If I wanted to charge that much for something that can easily be matched function/image quality wise for far less, I'd go out of my way to ensure each one is tested, then again, and then one more time before it is boxed up. Then, if for some unbeknown reasons, a lemon slips by this multilevel QC department, I get mad at myself, look for a reason why and how it could have possibly happened, all while communicate with the unfortunate owner, kiss his feet and do whatever to make it right.
Reading this story it really makes me pause for how have we all gotten this low with manufacturing & customer service, that all that primarily counts is profit. Why is it now all about how we sell something and not what we sell?
And I'll finish with this cliché : camera doe snot make winning images, never has, never will. If it does indeed, one who aimed it should never be credited with making that "winning" one. In other words, I view it as worst salesman pitch to praise a camera because there was a great image made with it. Then again, we're talking successful "dentist" buying one, so it does not matter what we sell, but how.