Fuji makes good stuff
No argument about Fuji and discontinuing products that they don't make money on, but THEY MAKE FILM, all this other stuff is old weird stuff that is being spooled. I don't know if this is robbing business from the companies that ACTUALLY MAKE FILM, maybe, maybe not.As a former Fuji faithful, Fuji fanboy, Fuji fanatic, let me tell you that Fuji is the EVIL in the film business, and the less we depend on Fuji, the better.
They have abandoned us film shooters, and every year they raise the prices. Also, you can never have a clear idea of which thing is really discontinued and which thing is not. Not to mention the fact that they have products that for some strange reason are only sold in Japan; they don't bother to market them outside.
There hasn't been any kind of Fuji representative in this forum to say "hi", to give customer support. Fuji doesn't care about us film shooters in any way.
I thought this was a Ferrania thread?
Why do people buy this Vario crap? Fuji makes good stuff, give them the business. I don't get it.
Ferrania posted a revised v1.4 "Best Practices" on the P30 website, which has HC-110 listed along with some other additions.Anyone have recommended times for developing P30 in Kodak HC-110? Preferably dilution E. thanks.
Anyone have recommended times for developing P30 in Kodak HC-110? Preferably dilution E. thanks.
I just developed mine, HC-110 B for a little over 5 minutes with vigorous agitation for the first minute, 5 seconds every 30, and 30 seconds continuous at the end. They're in the dryer now. The exposures looked fine, but I'll wait to judge until I've scanned them. I wish I hadn't been so rushed when I shot these, but I did get a few cool images. I also did bracketed long exposures of a cityscape at night to test the reciprocity characteristics a bit which I'll post over on the P30 thread.
Well I finally got my P30 film. Finally!!
Well I finally got my P30 film. Finally!!
Looks like there are several P30 groups on Flickr... This one has 188 images:Great! Post your results on the P30 Flickr site to bring the number up to 13....
I don't find perusing Flickr groups very interesting in order to judge the behaviour of a film.
In my always very HO there is very little utility to judge a negative response from a scanned photo on the internet.
Just like the same negative can be printed in different ways and yield different results, a positive, or a negative, can be scanned in many different ways, with very different results.
For instance, some of the pictures in the Flickr group are way too contrasty, but that has nothing to do with P30 itself.
What you see is a collection of 188 images, very different in character from each other, that cannot give you any idea of how the material will perform in your camera and darkroom.
The only things that can be derived are, maybe, graininess at great enlarmgement and, for colour material, colour response of a calibrated palette seen through a calibrated monitor but scanned with a scanner which was only hardware-calibrated (not also film-calibrated).
Some scanning theory is badly needed in this analogue forum
I submitted something (I thought) to a gallery, but I don't see it anywhere. I used the big Share With Us button.can contribute your results to our online gallery here: Dead Link Removed (look for the big red "Share with Us" button) - or simply share them on Twitter or Instagram with @FILMFerrania or #filmferrania or #p30alpha (or all of the above, just to be sure).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?