While I don't disagree with this, given the prices for ND filters, of whatever type, you can probably find a decent, used, enlarging meter for less than a single ND filter -- and put it to other uses, to boot.
That’s absolutely true. The Ilford meter would lend itself admirably to the task. But you’d either want to use a diffuser, or photograph a subject a bit less coarsely textured than Bill’s pebbles. Matt’s towel suggestion, perhaps?
When I referred to some cheap ND filters I'm thinking of something like Rosco Cinegel. Unless I'm misreading online ads, looks like the cost of a 20x24 inch sheet is around $15 US, more or less. I would imagine that the quality would be perfectly suitable for visual estimates.
I use it for black and white printing, where I arbitrarily decided to use Yellow for Highlight, Magenta for Shadow and White for Density.
As was requested in post 2, can you explain how to tell from the phone pic if the film was over/under developed?
Take the case where the +2 stops negative looks darker, what does that signify?
Thanks Bill, I hope to use this test.
Have you given it a name?
Bill, how does base+fogg effect this, it would seem the further from zone one, the less effect you will have?
Cancels out, the difference is a density difference.
Yes, of course, never mind, senior moment.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?