I'll point out that the Hasselblad dark slide light seal system includes a velvet strip, along with the foil and foam. The velvet strip also wears out. If you replace the foil and foam with another velvet strip, you will get light leaks.Why then users replaced those seals by same stuff and did not mount a strip of velvet instead? ...
I have not worked on an SL66 yet, but every service tech I know that has work on both (Hasselblad V's and Rollei SL66's) tell me they do not want to work on the Rollei - you need +2x more time and spare parts.<snip> ...While on the mid 60s, Rollei made it (SL66) already had a reliable FP MF camera (SL66)...
SL66 is indeed heavier and bigger than both Hasselblad and Kiev 88 (at least it feel that way to me). They are very nice cameras but if they start to fail it is not easy (or cheap) to fix it. Also very few technicians that service them. Moved from SL66 when it started to fail on me. My main body had a disconnected shutter button and probably curtain replacement. I was close to $900 for that.
Glass is amazing though. Really liked them; 40mm, 50mm and 80mm where my favorites.
Marcelo
I was interested in the SL66 and the Hasselblad and Samy's camera convinced me that service, parts and lenses were much more available with the Hasselblad, and the rest is history.
I liked SL66 when I had it, but quality seemed uneven, as if they had spent so much time fussing over details like the tilt mechanism and depth of field indicators, that they needed to make up for lost time by skimping on other details, like the lens locking mechanism, which didn't work very well, and the shutter release itself, which tended to have a loose, sloppy feel.
So the Kiev cameras were made where Ukraine is now right? So are they considered Ukrainian cameras or Russian cameras?
"Where Ukraine is now"?
Ukraine did not move, it still is where it was in 1945, actually it was founded in 1917.
Well, in the past I repeatedly urged to call those cameras either soviet or to use the right republic as origin, and was belittled for this.
Now, with suddenly international interest in Ukraine, such question arises by others...
In general concerning the USSR there was large influence by Russians on other, especially the rather small republics, so that a question like yours may be answered differently depending on subject.
3 decades of Kiev 88's.
Soviet on the left, and 2 Ukraine versions.
I was interested in the SL66 and the Hasselblad and Samy's camera convinced me that service, parts and lenses were much more available with the Hasselblad, and the rest is history.
The success of the Hasselblad as a MF SLR system is how it fits comfortably into the hands. No matter whatever seals, etc.defects, no other MF SLR comes close.
The differences I see are, shutter cloth, wheel, top of cap, mount of cap, feet.
Can confirm ETR series fits very comfortably on hand. Also, like stated, Speed grip and prism makes for a delightful experience. Not heavy and pretty balanced.
Forgot to mention that some weeks ago I tested a Pentacon Six with the Biometar 80mm and a WLF, and it was very light, easy to hold.
Um... i'd say the Bronica ETR series with the Speed grip and prism is as comfortable, Or more. And surely the more advanced Contax 645 MF SLRs should be more comfortable...
My Pentax 67 is also very comfortable with the small 90/2.8 lens,a right hand grip, and the chimney viewfinder. Weight is reasonable with this combination.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?