Raghu Kuvempunagar
Allowing Ads
Welcome to Photrio; beautiful prints @Ksnbdooanndin !
hi every one. this summer I read the article from @koraks and immediately tried it. my results were pretty similar to his tones, thinking "uh ok" and moved on. but two days ago I found this tread and raghu's tones are from another planet. so I tried again, and again and again. The crunchy black wasn't there. Today, on the last try I got something closer to him.
paper used was Fabriano unica, same sensitiser traditional solution A and 20% solution b plus ammonium chloride.
no PFC in the developer for the first one and some in the second one. What's interesting, while playing around I added some ammonium chloride in developer to compensate the excess of ofc and it worked!
@Raghu Kuvempunagar does it sound right?
why should I need more than normal?
I feel both a bit underexposed since there is a lot of copper and only a few of iron.
I'll might play a bit more aiming the blackest tone and then linearize it.
Raghu, what you did is amazing!
I attach the best print today that shows the issue in the highlights I experienced. it's also toned.
Also, what is the shelf life of Part B? I was thinking that it would be indefinite. I'm still using stock that I had mixed up back in June...
ok, today I made a big improvement! I don't have enough lucidity now to elaborate but want to share my print. Notice the stain in the enlargement! Very close to paper white
That's lovely @AgY!
@Raghu Kuvempunagar, I've made prints with and without Ammonium Chloride and the same result. I went back and made a print, with Ammonium Chloride added, but this time I pre-coated the paper with 20% Ammonium Chloride. The whites were better, in fact, where they should be. Not sure why this helped. I didn't have to do this before... they only thing I can think of is that the Copper Sulfate is low grade?? Maybe contains too many impurities??
Precoating mildy buffered papers with Ammonium Chloride does help the same way pre-acidification helps, except it also increases the warmth of the print. If the paper is strongly buffered, then precoating might not be adequate and hence I always prefer pre-acidification of such papers.
I am not sure what could be the impurities in commercial grade Copper Sulphate that cause problems. Light coloured particles could be just a hydration issue and not necessarily due to the presence of an impurity.
Note that Copper Sulphate readily reacts with Ferricyanide to form Copper Ferrocyanide which acts as stain. That's why Cupric ions in the developer need to be properly complexed by Citrate ions which prevents this reaction and consequent stain. The complexation is affected by pH of the developer and is most effective in a narrow pH range. If the paper is buffered and untreated, then pH can go up during development upsetting Copper-Citrate complex. Similarly, if Citric Acid is used in place of Sodium Citrate, complexation will be weaker.
Please check pH of the developer (~5.5-6.5) when you get a chance.
(I have been mixing up the one-shot version... .02g Copper Sulphate + 0.8g Sodium Citrate in 10ml distilled water.
The pH measured 54.4
I added another .01g Sodium Citrate which brought it to a pH of 55.9
I decided to give ferroblend a try after watching Andrew's video, and I just read through this entire thread from beginning to end. Most of my work in photography is digital, but I started playing around with cyanotype at the beginning of COVID lockdown. I had a lot of inkjet papers lying around that I didn't have decent profiles for, so my first cyanotypes were on inkjet paper. I find that it coats very consistently and, because it is so smooth, allows me to use negatives with tons of fine detail. I'm supposed to intoduce a gaggle of college photo students to cyanotype, and I think I will include ferroblend so that I've got multiple chances at experimentation with different papers & formulas without needing to wait between tries. My aim is to get results where the shadows are cyanotype deep blue and the midtones/highlights are copper. I've produced some on metallic inkjet paper that I really like; I'll post them when I bring them home from school later this week. My main issue with this process is the inability to maintain paper white. Anywhere the emulsion exists, even in the absense of exposure, I get a pinkish to orange color. Thanks to everyone working on this process!
I decided to give ferroblend a try after watching Andrew's video, and I just read through this entire thread from beginning to end. Most of my work in photography is digital, but I started playing around with cyanotype at the beginning of COVID lockdown. I had a lot of inkjet papers lying around that I didn't have decent profiles for, so my first cyanotypes were on inkjet paper. I find that it coats very consistently and, because it is so smooth, allows me to use negatives with tons of fine detail. I'm supposed to intoduce a gaggle of college photo students to cyanotype, and I think I will include ferroblend so that I've got multiple chances at experimentation with different papers & formulas without needing to wait between tries. My aim is to get results where the shadows are cyanotype deep blue and the midtones/highlights are copper. I've produced some on metallic inkjet paper that I really like; I'll post them when I bring them home from school later this week. My main issue with this process is the inability to maintain paper white. Anywhere the emulsion exists, even in the absense of exposure, I get a pinkish to orange color. Thanks to everyone working on this process!
I have to suggestion:
-stick to one paper that you know form other that works
ammonium chloride precoating change the game. did you you tried it?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?