Search results

Cheryl et. al., my statement about "porn" with the children was communicated incorrectly, I did mean children that are photographed for the intent of sexual pleasure of the viewer. But that's a matter of view also, which is sad. Everyone has their view on it. But I want to be clear on that...

Well, Bill. That is just silly, silly silly. I think it's most important that you read my Disclaimer in my first post here. I specifically wrote that the views are my own, that them or leave them. Now, How dare you write that I am using my child for self-promotion of my blog. For what reason...

Bob, thank you for your honest and well thought out answer. I not only respect it but admire you for backing up your viewpoints with some meat. That means a lot. Cheryl, we both know that there is no way of telling what any of the children's price was for this. You and I both know that. But...

These are all just awesome suggestions and I'll be following them. Thank you so much for your time and help.

Geez David, Great idea. Just a plastic one I guess? I'm thinking any type of material would have lint.... Thx

Hey Cheryl, sorry to hear about the childhood. Sux and then we move on. Some don't tho. Glad to see your surviving. I've found that the more I've shared thoughout my life the more I hear "hey, me too" I think that there is a stage where it becomes healthy to share, so, nuff said as this is not a...

Good evening. I'm getting a lot of dust etc., on my negatives, shown when scanned, I've been drying over the kitchen sink as I have no darkroom to speak of. What is my best solution, location to dry the strips. (Ok, I'm a single guy and don't clean every day... ok, ok, back off, I don't...

Brian, I don't think I am brokering any kind of "Deal" but simply asking the reader a question. That seems fair if they are able to form an opnion on someone else's child why would they not be able to answer this regarding their own child? Each one of these models is someone's child! Please...

Disclaimer: I am a victim of Sexual Child abuse. Perhaps the worst kind. Daily Rape by an uncle, a trusted member of the family that led me believe I was loved, that he cared for me and a host of other very sick tendencies that pedophiles do all to well. This also included him taking pictures of...

Wow, I finally visited this thread. I pride myself on not judging people. But I am, on the other hand a victim of a sick person during my very young years that included photographs so I have to be careful and really think about this one and not let my mind make a uninformed judgement. This is...

Thank you but can't find it either here.

Geez, Jason, do I ever enjoy your art.

Good day you good looking peeps... So, I have a plastic tank for two reels, but I want to use only for one, I'll plan on using the film reel plus the empty one, and a bit over the amount that I need to cover. Any problem with that? Thanks Tom

I will have you in my thoughts. things do get better dear... I'm living proof.

Photobum, I did in fact shoot in Asbury Park around '05 but it was not with the APUG group, it was an assignment for the Gay Pride parade. OMG, it has photo ops every where you turn.

Give A&I Labs a shot, I've used them for years and have always been 100 pct pleased. Mailers are available via them, aandi.com or B&H. Sorry, can't give you any help on Dwaynes.

Kino, The first amendment laws are always being challenged and very well should be. We should NEVER be some lump of coal just taking whatever is being shoveled out to us. This is what the U.S. Supreme court is for. Geez, and you have the nerve to tell the OP to get real...... Just remember...

Ian, I took a look at Colgach's site. All his photos look the same there. I did see the ones that were .dr5 processed and they just don't look that different to me. I'm sure on the lightbox it would be different. David, the samples he has on his site are much too small. Thanks tons guys. Tom

Yes, L-358 I NEVER trust the in camera meter. (albeit the M6 is pretty spot on thus far.)

V500

Just scanned 10 35mm neg's and after preview the Scan Process quoted 8 min as was done in 6.5 with ICE I'm again, very pleased with the 200 dlr scanner

Forgot... Here's the 120 Fuji 160S scan. Sammy in the snow.

I can scan 3 120's color with Ice at a time, highest rez and it takes the 3 to be done in 7 min flat. i'm very, very happy with it. (it's subjective as compared to a Nikon 9000 which I can't even come close to) I'll do two strips of 35mm this afternoon and post my findings if anyone cares. Thanks

Sammy In the Snow..... Now, the print of this bad boy was just nasty, but the scan shows me that it's ok. Taken with a 120 film, Fuji 160S and I checked, it's still available.....

Well, that was the case. Just bad prints. At $1.80 for 16 exposures I can live with it. Thanks tons guys. Tom

I am using the embedded Epson s/w. Roy, Yes, I scan 35mm with very, above acceptable results. So, when using multiable neg's it does in fact see each one indiv. Thank you much. Tom

Sometimes, but I ALWAYS keep the lens glare hood on, I can't tell you how many times it's saved my bacon.

Hi Mike, I understand. I guess I'm lucky. This is my first M and I find the fit to be perfect for me. I'm more then excited about the LED in the finder. Did you not really feel this way while testing it in the store? One thing I did with this was to test drive it for 4 days to make sure.

I'm thinking about have a roll with a upcoming portrait shoot sent to have processed in dr5 chrome... Does anyone have a scan of one please? If not, can you share your exp. with the final product? Thanks tons. Tom

It's a matter of perspective I guess, I feel it so comfortable and even a bit smaller but I'm use to Med Format et. al. I'm finding the camera simply amazing, exciting and just so dang wonderful.