what was the last camera you used, last film and how was it developed

[mshchem]

I just loaded a roll of Ektachrome in a M6. I'm going to go out in the lovely weather.

 

[murdockhendrix]

Petri Color 35, Kentmere Pan 100, developed at home, Kodak HC-110, Dil B, 1:31, 5:45m at 20° C, JOBO 1510 tank, inversion.

 

[Donald Qualls]

Still working my way through a roll of XP2 Super (EI 1250, to be push +1 and bleach bypassed) in my Stereo Graphic. Even at that EI, f/4 at 1/125 doesn't allow much in the way of low light. Maybe I'll get a couple rolls of Delta 3200 or T-Max P3200 (while I still can).

 

[Rolleiflexible]

Rolleicord II (Triotar lens), expired Tri-X in Rodinal (stand).

 

[Paul Howell]

Minolta A9000, motor winder, with Sigma 50mm, 2.8, micro lens, Minolta 28mm 2,8 and 24 to 80. Film Foma 400 at 250 developed in HC110 dilution E, (new version.)

 

[JerseyDoug]

Leica IIIg, 50/2.8 Elmar, bulk loaded 12 exposures of Foma 400, shot at ISO 400, developed in Rodinal (1+50), digital camera scan, ContactPage Pro. Two shots of workmen on the roof of a nearby building are in the queue for prints.

 

[Randy Stewart]

Fuji GA645Zi, shooting HP-5+, developed in my own developer formula. It was a first test roll to insure that all of the many automatic functions of the newly purchased camera were working properly. Results: Impressive, particularly for the accuracy and consistency of auto exposure. Unhappily, I took a tumble shortly thereafter and have been house bound pending leg operation ever since, so the 2nd roll is still in there.

 

[quilts]

Last camera was an Olympus Pen FT. Film was Tri-X 400 and I developed at home using HC-110. It was my first time using HC-110 and I was pretty pleased with the results. I wanted to give it a try as I don't develop film very consistently so I liked the idea of using HC-110 as a "one-shot" developer.

 

[Disconnekt]

Kalimar k-90 & Tokina 19-35mm, a roll of Kodak 500T pushed to 3200, just dropped it off at usps to be dev'ed in ecn2 chems.

Pushed the roll just to see how it looked & metered using my Gossen lunapro sbc with variable angle (spot) attachment. May not be a good/100% accurate way to test it the lightmeter, but Im sure I'll get something/a few decent shots from the roll.

 

[AnselMortensen]

Bronica ETRSi, 75mm.
Portra 160 and expired Plus-X.
C-41 on its way to the lab, B/W in my queue for development in Rodinal.

 

[warpath]

4x5 graflex series D and expired vericolor from the 70s. still haven't developed so cross fingers there's at least an image haha

 

[darkosaric]

M3 with DR Summicron - tested Efke iso 25 (expired 2004), I just rolled last 30,5 meters in 18 cartridges. Still works fine (developed in Rodinal 1+100, semistand).

 

[murdockhendrix]

Bronica EC-TL, Arista.EDU Ultra 200, developed at home, Kodak HC-110, Dil H, 1:63, 3:00 Pre-wash, 9:30m at 20° C, JOBO 1520 tank, inversion.

 

[FriedLouisStudio]

Tri-X from my Nikkormat FTn developed in (Film Photography Project's version of) D-76 1:1 using a 50-plus-year-old Anscomatic reel/tank. Time was 10:30 at 67 degrees, with agitation roughly every 30 seconds. I got good negs, though since I was just estimating exposure, some are better than others.

 

[murdockhendrix]

Bronica EC-TL, Arista.EDU Ultra 200, developed at home, Kodak HC-110, Dil H, 1:63, 3:00 Prewash, 9:30m at 20° C, JOBO 1520 tank, inversion.

 

[Cholentpot]

Just scanned a roll of Arista EDU 400 Ultra shot in an SRT 101. I pushed it a stop.

Does anyone else here find that cheaper or suspect 400 ISO film looks better pushed a stop? I've been seeing this with a few kinds of film. N-74 looks far better shot at 800 and pushed a bit in development, same for Ultrafine Extreme 400. It might just be my own preferences but I've not seen this with Tri-X or Tmax 400.

 

[FujiLove]

Minolta Dynax/Maxxum 5, mostly with a bog-standard 50mm f1.7...15 year old Fuji Reala 100...lab C-41 processed.

The negatives arrived in the post yesterday, but I first thought they'd returned someone else's film. Then realised I didn't recognise any of the photos because it had taken me three years to finish the roll.

Still not sure whether it was a nice surprise, or a sad reflection of the last few years. Probably both

 

[Andrew O'Neill]

RB67. Delta 400, 100, HP5, Pan F... Some got Obsidian Aqua, some 510-Pyro, and one got Pyrocat-HD...

 

[Pitotshock]

Last camera was the Tachihara 45 Fiel with Schneider 210mm,
Last "film" was Kodak Endura RA4 paper in lustre finish, filters required to balance colors 85A, 85B, 50YCC, 10YCC, 40MCC.
Developed with an older working solution Dektol in total darkness, then fully exposed to light and Kodak RA4 Dev and Blix in room light.

The paper wasn't meant to do this and does get a little wonky depending on the relative light available.

 

[Donald Qualls]

I had my Kiev 2 out yesterday with the 50/1.5 Sonnar copy, and loaded ORWO DN21 (ISO 12, same film Lomography rebrands as Kino Berlin). Haven't processed yet, but I'll likely run it in Parodinal 1:50.

 

[DMS206]

Voigtländer Bergheil, Fomapan 100 , 510 pyro

 

[murdockhendrix]

Bronica EC-TL, 2 rolls Arista.EDU Ultra 100, developed at home, Photographer's Formulary TD-16, 1:1 (250ml:250ml = 500ml), 3:00m pre-wash, 10:00m at 20° C, JOBO 1520 tank, inversion

 

[AnselMortensen]

Eastman 2D 8x10 w/Verito, HP5+

Bronica ETRSi, Cinestill 400D/120, Ektar 100/120, Aviphot 200/220 hand-rolled by member here MCB18.

Nikon N90s, w/AF 50mm 1.8D, Adox Color Mission, Popho Luminar, Ektar 100

Nothing processed yet.
Will develop the 220 myself in Rodinal, lab processing for everything else.

UPDATE:
Aviphot 200 shot at EI 4 on a bright sunny day with an R72 filter, processed for 20 min @68°F in Rodinal 1+50 gave me some beautiful negatives.

 

[JerseyDoug]

Nikon N75, Nikkor, 50/1.8D, HP5 Plus, shot at ISO 800, developed with Ilfosol 3 (1+9), digital camera scan, ContactPage Pro.

 

[mpirie]

RZ67Pro II, 50mm lens, Pan-F @EI25 in Pyro HD 1+1+50 11min.