This Bodes Bad Things For Film & Papers

[GregY]

Of course it depends on what one wants to do with the prints. For me I have been making hand made books and using Hahnemuhle 17x22double sided cotton paper which runs just over $10 per sheet but
for 8 1/2 x 11 pages I can at least make 8 per sheet and rationalise that it’s $1 each image. So a box of 25 sheets can make up to 200 pages.

Hahnemule prices don't help with the price of enlarging paper.... Ilford warmtone 20x24" (50 sheets).... $818 USD ......$1200 Cad by the time it gets to me......

 

[jeffreyg]

Hahnemule prices don't help with the price of enlarging paper.... Ilford warmtone 20x24" (50 sheets).... $818 USD ......$1200 Cad by the time it gets to me......

I understand. I was just relating what I have been doing. Most of the wet printing I do is pt/pd and that’s costly enough as well but fortunately I have enough supplies from before prices went crazy.

 

[mshchem]

Freestyle, Blue Moon and others all show a similar price breakdown: Kodak B&W films are less expensive than Ilford by a similar margin. It's not just a B&H thing.

Yes but the biggest players effect the prices. I suspect that Harman is choosing to price Kentmere at a value point, Ilford especially HP5 and FP4 as the premium traditional films they are. Hard to know.

 

[retina_restoration]

Yes but the biggest players effect the prices. I suspect that Harman is choosing to price Kentmere at a value point, Ilford especially HP5 and FP4 as the premium traditional films they are. Hard to know.

I simply wanted to point out that the Kodak/Ilford price ratio is similar at all the retailers I looked at, not just at B&H. Unfortunately, the tariffs have now pushed the price of Ilford sheet films beyond what I'm willing to pay. I will not pay $10+ USD per sheet of 8x10 film. I can make a collodion negative for about $2.50!

 

[mshchem]

I simply wanted to point out that the Kodak/Ilford price ratio is similar at all the retailers I looked at, not just at B&H. Unfortunately, the tariffs have now pushed the price of Ilford sheet films beyond what I'm willing to pay. I will not pay $10+ USD per sheet of 8x10 film. I can make a collodion negative for about $2.50!

Yeah, the sheet film thing is a real dilemma. I've got some I need to shoot. I do love Ilford (and Kodak, Foma, Adox) black and white film. I'll be a buyer as long as I'm able. I've been quite satisfied with Kentmere films too. Don't care for the Harman color films, I've bought a few rolls as a measure of supporting the cause.

 

[chuckroast]

I simply wanted to point out that the Kodak/Ilford price ratio is similar at all the retailers I looked at, not just at B&H. Unfortunately, the tariffs have now pushed the price of Ilford sheet films beyond what I'm willing to pay. I will not pay $10+ USD per sheet of 8x10 film. I can make a collodion negative for about $2.50!

This is what has kept me from entering the 8x10 world, even before the tariffs. I keep wondering if I should take a shot at it using x ray film.

 

[retina_restoration]

This is what has kept me from entering the 8x10 world, even before the tariffs. I keep wondering if I should take a shot at it using x ray film.

I have enjoyed working with Fomapan 100, which is literally half the price of the Ilford equivalent, so I see plenty of Fomapan in my future. I'll likely do more 5x7 work and leave 8x10 for when I need to make a larger contact print.

 

[RalphLambrecht]

Not very much, I'd guess less than a gram in an 8x10.

that would equate to roughly 1$ of silver /35mm film or an 8x10,but manufacturers charge us up to 10 times that.

 

[koraks]

that would equate to roughly 1$ of silver /35mm film or an 8x10,but manufacturers charge us up to 10 times that.

Must have something to do with the fact that if you take the silver out of the film, there's some material left, still. Maybe that has something to do with it? IDK, just a wild guess.