The ultimate film washing method

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,411
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format

Similar to my putting a paper towel on the lowest corner of the film to draw off water. And it can draw off the excess quickly. Try it, you may like it.
 
OP
OP

radiant

Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2019
Messages
2,135
Location
Europe
Format
Hybrid
Conclusion is probably that with filtered water + photoflo there shouldn't be any problems. Strange; that is exactly what I do. There is always some marks on the non-emulsion side no matter what I do.

Here is current statistics of my tap water, is there something suspicious on these?

 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,658
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
 
Joined
Jan 31, 2020
Messages
1,294
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
I've read frequently that people need to use less photoflo than the instructions say to avoid streaks. Curious that has only been mentioned once here.
I use the analogous Tetenal product at recommend dilution, but it only works with demineralised water for me (washing is with somewhat hard tap water).
 

Tom Kershaw

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 5, 2004
Messages
4,974
Location
Norfolk, United Kingdom
Format
Multi Format
I use the analogous Tetenal product at recommend dilution, but it only works with demineralised water for me (washing is with somewhat hard tap water).
Like you I use the Tetenal product at the recommended in distilled water and have found this approach works well. Washing is with hard tap water, as is stop bath and fixer, although I do mix developer in distilled water.
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,658
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format

shouldn't the Ph be closer to 7.0?
 

brian steinberger

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 5, 2007
Messages
3,009
Location
Pennsylvania
Format
Med. Format RF
I went through all this years ago when I moved into my current home. Very hard tap water. Was getting streaks. I tried literally everything and in my situation here is what worked for me

8 min wash in running water. Hard water actually is a good thing for washing film/paper.

Fill the tank with distilled water, agitate 20 times let sit for 1 minute and dump. Repeat.

Into photo flo mixed with distilled water. For me it’s 5 drops for 450ml water. I let it sit 30 sec or so.

Take film off reel then see saw the film back though the photo flo once and immediately hang up.

NO squeegee or fingers.

Heres the key that was an eye opener for me. Hang the film on a diagonal, as Maris mentions above. Roger Hicks also used this method and it was a last ditch effort for me to get rid of the marks, and it worked! Instead of the water all accumulating in the bottom frame as the film dries it gradually works it way along the bottom edge of the film.

Hope this helps.
 
Last edited:

tezzasmall

Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2013
Messages
1,137
Location
Southend on Sea Essex UK
Format
Plastic Cameras
I used to buy distilled water for cars and irons and use it only for the last rinse with the smallest amount of photo-flo that I could put in, which gave me really clean negatives, MOST of the time. Any deposits were on the shiny side of the film, so easily wiped off.

This was until (and I don't know why I didn't think of it sooner) I read about and started to use the water filtered in my Brita drinking water filter jug. Saves the small amount to pay on the distilled water and has given me clean negs.

If I notice a lot of water on the negs when hung up, I dip my hand in the last rinse and run the film between my thumb and finger gently.

Terry S
 

Craig75

Member
Joined
May 9, 2016
Messages
1,234
Location
Uk
Format
35mm
I use half recommended amount of photoflo and just let it sit in the tank for 5 mins.

The 4ml.or whatever it is of photoflo left streaks on negatives.

And I found I had to leave it soaking in tank longer too

I use distilled water for photoflo.

The Russian roulette of photoflo and water.
 

VinceInMT

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 14, 2017
Messages
1,887
Location
Montana, USA
Format
Multi Format
Before investing in a way to measure the quality of your tap water, check with your water provider. Ours, a municipal service, has monthly breakdowns of dissolved solids and other data on their web site.

Me, I use distilled water with a little photflo and hang to dry in my darkroom and close the door. The only time I’ve had a problem is too much photoflo.
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
3,596
Location
Eugene, Oregon
Format
4x5 Format
OP
OP

radiant

Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2019
Messages
2,135
Location
Europe
Format
Hybrid
shouldn't the Ph be closer to 7.0?

We are talking about drinkable tap water here. Typically tap water is 7,3 – 8,0 ph and the requirement is 6,5 – 9,5. Quite wide margin actually. They want to keep the tap water alkaline so that the pipes do not corrode.

Before investing in a way to measure the quality of your tap water, check with your water provider.

I attached the analysis of my tap water above. Could you take a look at it and tell if something is problematic with the values?

Hang the film on a diagonal, as Maris mentions above

This is interesting tip. How do you do that?
 

BMbikerider

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
2,961
Location
UK
Format
35mm
When I lived in the south of England I occasionally had problems with streaking and water droplets. However since moving to the north the water quality is far better. The difference being the water in the south has a high lime content and is as hard as hell, while the water where i live now is mainly water collected from rivers and stored in above ground reservoirs before being treated for consumption. Consequently it has an almost zero lime content tending to be slightly acidic. The final rinse is always in a static tank with a drop of Ilford wetting agent for anything up to 5 mins and then hung up to dry. I cannot remember when the last time was I had water marks.
 

tokam

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 7, 2008
Messages
586
Location
Sydney, Aust
Format
Multi Format
I agree with the whipping action of the film strip. Just attach the film clips to each end of the strip of negs. Hold on tight and give the film 2 or 3 whips. The larger drops of water on the non-emulsion side are driven off leaving a few pinhead sized droplets which will evaporate quickly. The emulsion side of the film should have an even layer of water still soaking the emulsion.

I'm not sure about spritzing the film with more water as you have just tried to get rid of excess water on the film. Whatever works for all of us. Also, only a drop or two of photoflo in the final rinse. Raise and lower the reel in the solution a few times and leave to soak for a couple of minutes. You want to see minimal bubbles in the photoflo solution.

I still get particle or dust marks even though I filter my water and solutions before use. Not too many and they clone out after scanning.
 
OP
OP

radiant

Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2019
Messages
2,135
Location
Europe
Format
Hybrid
I still get particle or dust marks even though I filter my water and solutions before use. Not too many and they clone out after scanning.

Remember this is 100% analog forum. Solution to dirty negatives is not to fix things in "post" or digitally here.
 

warden

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 21, 2009
Messages
3,059
Location
Philadelphia
Format
Medium Format

I had troubles with drying marks, and found that switching to a final rinse with distilled water and a touch of Ilfotol removed virtually all the problem. I still get a rare visible drying mark on a roll (only on the backing side) which is easy to post clean without damaging the backing. I dry the film in a homemade foam core box to keep the dust off of it, which works.
 

Kino

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
7,772
Location
Orange, Virginia
Format
Multi Format
Bill Troop and Steve Anchell state in the "Film Developing Cookbook" that the "Ilford method" of film washing is essentially is correct IF you add a 5 minute waiting period between tank fill/inversion and the next tank/fill.

Take it for what it is worth; I used the method for years without the 5 minute wait between tank refill and agitation with wash water and my negatives have been fine, but that is up to you.
 

warden

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 21, 2009
Messages
3,059
Location
Philadelphia
Format
Medium Format
Wow that's interesting, I've only used the Ilford method but don't pause between steps. I'd go a little batty if I had to wait that long while washing so I most likely won't.
 

tokam

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 7, 2008
Messages
586
Location
Sydney, Aust
Format
Multi Format
Remember this is 100% analog forum. Solution to dirty negatives is not to fix things in "post" or digitally here.
Oops. Sorry about that but up until the dried negs are cut up and placed into protective sleeves, my points still hold.

(...wanders off muttering to himself "Maybe I should start a new thread about print spotting. Better practise first. Now where in the hell are my brushes, knives and dyes. Bugger!! My tubes of Paterson retouching dyes have gone rock hard. Perhaps because I haven't used them in 30 years...".)
 

bluechromis

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 11, 2015
Messages
665
Format
35mm
This is quote from the PE about washing:

"I have posted this before, but Mason, one of the early proponents of the sequential dump and fill showed mathematically and in practice that this method was not as effective as a stream of continuously running water for washing film or paper. He therefore repudiated the dump and fill method. I posted the equations in another thread on this same subject which keeps coming up over and over.

The best wash is a stream of constantly flowing water which is kept up until the photomaterial tests free of hypo residue and silver halide using the appropriate tests. The only way to change this is to change dC/dT or the change in concentration in the photoproduct with respect to time and this can only be changed by changing dD/dT or the change in diffusion rate of the unwanted materials with respect to time."

https://www.photrio.com/forum/threads/washing-film-best-environmentally-friendly-way-to-do-it.43248/

His statement might be taken in the context of all things being equal, what is the ideal washing method? It may be different if one looks at it from the perspective of water conservation and asks whether the Ilford method can provide adequate washing even if it is not quite as efficient as the Kodak constant flow approach.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP

radiant

Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2019
Messages
2,135
Location
Europe
Format
Hybrid
I developed some films yesterday and examined the results.

I found out that the dirt I have been seeing is wetting agent. I washed the films again in distilled water (after testing with wetting agent) and got MUCH better results, only few small chalk (?) dots on the back side. And yes nothing that I couldn't wipe off for sure. Someone previously mentioned on this thread that excessive wetting agent is bad. For sure it is. But I was using the recommended amount. I will try again today with "just a tad" and see if it changes anything. I think the error is to use the recommended amount of wetting agent.

I also tested whipping away the excessive water. It helps a bit, not a dramatic effect but a difference. I did the whipping while the film was inside the reel. I will probably get a salad dryer for this.

Currently my suggestion is that do the final rinse with pure distilled water and you should be fine. Or maybe two rinses with distilled. And whip the excessive water as much as you can.
 
OP
OP

radiant

Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2019
Messages
2,135
Location
Europe
Format
Hybrid
Film washing has two phases:

A) How to remove residual fixer / archiving wash
B) How to remove chalk or other visual marks from the film

I think phase A is pretty straightforward to do. One can add thio clear (from squirt bottle) to some of the rinses if you really want to make sure. But I'm assured that the Ilford method is sufficient for A.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…