Unique metering system
Meanwhile I added a VLC 3 to my collection.
Pentacon had many worldwide "firsts".
The VLCs have a unique metering system:
The metering cell is located inside the mirror-box. As with many other cameras of competing manufacturers.
BUT the cell is located lateral and there is no collapsable accessory-mirror. Instead there is some reflection/refraction system located inside the flat mirror-assembly and similar perpendicular at the side of the mirror, guiding the metering light to the cell.
I know of no other camera using this approach.
Has anyone details on the used light-guide?
Can someone hint at a respective patent?
BUMP
(To my understanding the B-series uses a similar system to guide the light to the sensor. Am I right?)
BX20 seems not so bad. I meant that TTL-OTF implementation.
Is the Praktica Nova IB PL worth buying? Need a m42 replacement since my MTL3 is going to repair's and I found this camera completly new with the meter reacting to light and such.
It looks like an old model from the 60s, if you are using as a shooter I would recommend a PLC3 or a VLC3 with working lightmeter.
The VLC I get it. You can have both the waist level finder and a normal viewfinder.
But why the PLC?
Because these were the "expensive" Praktica Ls and they offer open metering with Pentacon and CZJ electric lenses as previously discussed.
I missed few shots with my MTL50 because of the dark viewfinder when I step down for metering.
Couple of things to be aware of with the Nova, the viewfinder is dim and they have a cloth shutter.
Unique metering system
Meanwhile I added a VLC 3 to my collection.
Pentacon had many worldwide "firsts".
The VLCs have a unique metering system:
The metering cell is located inside the mirror-box. As with many other cameras of competing manufacturers.
BUT the cell is located lateral and there is no collapsable accessory-mirror. Instead there is some reflection/refraction system located inside the flat mirror-assembly and similar perpendicular at the side of the mirror, guiding the metering light to the cell.
I know of no other camera using this approach.
Has anyone details on the used light-guide?
Can someone hint at a respective patent?
After using my new Praktica, which was fun, the only thing I mostly got was the idea that I have to get another one. This one has light sealing problems and the winding mechanism is pretty rought.But still produced some nice photos, since it was my first roll without any kind of light meter.![]()
Any ideas on the next Praktica?
The photos:
https://flic.kr/s/aHskEZ4XPt
After using my new Praktica, which was fun, the only thing I mostly got was the idea that I have to get another one. This one has light sealing problems and the winding mechanism is pretty rought.But still produced some nice photos, since it was my first roll without any kind of light meter.![]()
Any ideas on the next Praktica?
The photos:
https://flic.kr/s/aHskEZ4XPt
I like the BC series; the 1, 3 , X etc. The electronics are sturdier than the BX models and the standard 50mm 1.8 lens is very sharp. One major flaw of the BX series is that the movable battery terminal is connected with a thin wire which flexes and falls off or, as the wire strands break, the increased resistance causes eratic operation. The BC series has a more durable flexable ribbon cable attached to the contact.
But the BC series use a different lens mount and I prefer to stick to the m42 for now.
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |