• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Post your woodland scenes!

1972

A
1972

  • 10
  • 4
  • 73
2break

H
2break

  • 4
  • 2
  • 77

Forum statistics

Threads
202,584
Messages
2,842,729
Members
101,387
Latest member
Vanderast
Recent bookmarks
0
BOS 3.JPG

Linhof Technorama 617 II + Super-Angulon 90mm on Tri-X @ 1600ASA in X-Tol 1+1, wet scanned on Epson 750
 
Hunting Camp at Dawn. Camera is Canon FT with FL 28/3.5 and film is Fuji Superia 400. Developed/scanned by The Darkroom.

Camp.jpg



Chris
 
Fiery Gizzard Creek. Nikon fm2n, most likely the series e 28/2.8, fp4+ from some years back.

i-V6kvVtP-XL.jpg

Cool, used to know a landowner there and went caving on his property as well as Catacomb and Bible Springs on the roadside. Where on the creek is this?
 
I love this! 😍
Thank you kindly! I have extensively photographed this area over the past 16+ years and will share more from the area.

Cool, used to know a landowner there and went caving on his property as well as Catacomb and Bible Springs on the roadside. Where on the creek is this?
This is about a quarter mile down the trail head from the parking lot. I have photographed there so much that I began really slowing my walk down to a crawl looking for new compositions. This is a fun little spot on the creek with a lot of potential.
 
Another from further down the fiery gizzard trail, about 2 miles in at the Chimneys. Kentmere 100 film on a canon a1 back....probably the vivitar 28/2.5 or ssc 35/2. No anti halation layer on the k100 so blooming in full effect due to the backlight. I think it works here, or at least I like it.

i-dvVw6dn-XL.jpg
 
Schelde meersen, Gentbrugge, Belgium.
SCHELDEMEERSEN 09-2.JPG

Hasselblad 500C/M + Distagon C 50mm T* and K2, on Ilford HP5+ at box speed in FX-55 for 16min at 21°C, dry scanned on Epson 750.
 
Mr. Buffington has already posted the glories of my region so I apologize for piling on, but here is a platinum-toned kallitype of my photo of the Appalachian Trial on its approach to Firescald Knob, in Madison County, North Carolina.

full


Rolleiflex 3.5E, Fomapan 200 (Ei 100), stand developed in Rodinal.
 
A question:
Why do my pictures I post here have a red-pinkish tone?
When I 'prepare' them in LRC, after scanning the negative, I warm the image tone a tad for some deepness, and it looks good, rather very slightly 'cold' low-key sepia but certainly not reddish-pinkish.
But when I see the same photograph again a while after its posted, like the last one now, it looks not good.
Please note, it happens a while after the posting, not in the preview nor in the next day, it takes some time, and not all of them, some do and other don't get the image tone 'changed', strange...
I use always the same computer, a Macbook Pro, the same platform and the screen thus, and always the same toning preset in LRC.
 
Young birches in the Gentbrugse Scheldemeersen (the marches along the river Escaut) Ghent (Gentbrugge), Flanders, Belgium.

SCHELDEMEERSEN 10-3.JPG

Hasselblad 500C/M + Distagon C 50mm T* and K2, on Ilford HP5+ at box speed in FX-55 for 16min at 21°C, dry scanned on Epson 750.
 
Young birches in the Gentbrugse Scheldemeersen (the marches along the river Escaut) Ghent (Gentbrugge), Flanders, Belgium.
Nice composition, but my eyes want to peek into the dark foreground, and are frustrated by the absence of details there.
And the image tone, is that what you were referring to above? Indeed it looks reddish on my monitor as well.
A question:
Why do my pictures I post here have a red-pinkish tone?
Could it be something to do with color profiles? Like, you upload an image with a specific, slightly uncommon profile, that is mis-interpreted by the forum software? How about trying to upload in sRGB, just to be on the safe/dumb side? Just a hypothesis, of course, probably wrong.
 
I really like this one. The colors. How it feels like a Celtic scared space. The mill stone is a perfect touch.

Thanks Stephen. It's a well known spot, and in some respects looks even better in full autumn colour. However then you wouldn't get the same contrast between the green and red/orange tones, so this is a somewhat different take.
 
Last edited:
Nice composition, but my eyes want to peek into the dark foreground, and are frustrated by the absence of details there.
And the image tone, is that what you were referring to above? Indeed it looks reddish on my monitor as well.

Could it be something to do with color profiles? Like, you upload an image with a specific, slightly uncommon profile, that is mis-interpreted by the forum software? How about trying to upload in sRGB, just to be on the safe/dumb side? Just a hypothesis, of course, probably wrong.

Thank you Bernard.

The foreground was dark, wet, muddy and full of decomposed leafs...
I found the contrast between "darkness" of the foreground an the 'whiteness' of the birches interesting.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom