Just in case you missed it, that was a response to Old Gregg's thinking that he needed colour to make successful landscape photos. The image is his, after I showed how it look if the colour was removed from it, to show how its strengths came from much more than its colour.
Beautiful. Is that Portra 160 ? Please don’t let Stephen convert it to B&W
Beautiful. Is that Portra 160 ? Please don’t let Stephen convert it to B&W
That was actually MattKing.
I wondered how ethical it is to publicly make changes to an image without the artist's approval.
Hah. My backfired attempt at a jokeThat was actually MattKing.
I wondered how ethical it is to publicly make changes to an image without the artist's approval.
Hah. My backfired attempt at a joke
FWIW, without consent, I would never demonstrate a change to someone else's image, except in the context of sharing that change with the photographer, and for discussion purposes only.
And I wouldn't have done so in Old Gregg's case, if the obvious strength of form in his example photo wasn't so inconsistent with his own comment about own abilities.
And it is an interesting topic Stephen. Perhaps I'll start a separate thread in the Ethics and Philosophy sub-forum.
These threads which display - in fact share - so much interesting and wonderful photography do bring rise to thinking about what it means to display work on the immensely accessible and incredibly malleable world that is the internet.
I've really enjoyed seeing your photographs. If I may say so, they are very different than what I expected, because I had wrongly assumed that your photographs would be more similar to the analytically rigorous information that you normally post.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?