• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Post your Infrared Photographs here



Look at my post: R25 [25A] has a factor of 3 [23 = 8 times the exposure time], 720 [72R] has a factor of 5 [25 = 32 times the exposure time]. Mathematics shows that 5 is greater than 3. I have found the filter factor for the 720 listed as 6 but that was a little too high sometimes from my work with it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wratten_number
 
Last edited:

25A has a filter factor of 8, 3 stops: 2^3-stops=2x2x2=8 filter factor (8x exposure increase). Your link also says 3 stops, not filter factor of 3.

R72 appears to have a 5-7 stop increase needed: 2^5=32; 2^6=64; 2^7=128. I think the time of day I was shooting and the conditions when I metered, I was a bit less than 6 stops. So maybe 2/3 stops more exposure than your recommendation.
 
Last edited:
I am not finding R72 filter factors on Hoya or any websites. I found one unofficial listing of filter factor=20 to 40 .

The R72 blocks far enough down in to the red/IR that the filter factor will be very heavily dependent on the IR sensitivity curve of the specific film in use. A film that cuts off at 720 nm will need a much larger filter factor than one that "sees" down to 820 nm.

This is true even with visible red filters, to a lesser extent -- some panchro films have more red sensitivity than others, even when you're well within the visible.
 
Mixed shot for comic purpose:



Nikon FA, Tokina 28-70mm lens @ 35mm, f/8, 1/125th, Kodak HIE film rated at ISO 200, Bogen 3021/3030, #25 Filter.
Nikon D200, Tokina 90mm f/2.5, f/11, 1/250th, ISO 100
 

A very nice series!
 
An image from my second time shooting IR. Bronica RF645, 65mm @ f22 on Rollei Infrared 400.
 

Attachments

  • Reservoir-IR.jpg
    661.1 KB · Views: 206
Indeed, but what is going on to the sky?

Some what darkened by the filter, but there is a lot of moisture closer to the surface and that is what causes the lighter tones near the trees.
 
Uncertain, I think my film lab may have done something wrong in the development process. Other shots had random black spots scattered about.

I agree. The moisture of the scene cannot be the reason in my opinion. Have you asked the lab already?
 
I agree. The moisture of the scene cannot be the reason in my opinion. Have you asked the lab already?

Unfortunately, I didn't. I do know that they do not handle much IR film. I tend not to ask the owner questions. Next time I have some Rollei 400, I'll bring it to a more experienced shop.
 
Mamiya C220, Rollei IR, Hoya R72, Pyrocat-HD

 
  • 250swb
  • Deleted
  • Reason: wrong size image
Recently picked up a Chroma Snapshot 4x5. Decided to test it with a sheet of Rollei IR 400.
 

Attachments

  • Rollei_IR_4x5.jpg
    407.4 KB · Views: 172
Recently picked up a Chroma Snapshot 4x5. Decided to test it with a sheet of Rollei IR 400.

I'm going through old posts to learn more about IR film, and I find this photo of the street I work on. What are the odds?

Edit: Now I'm starting to doubt myself, but it looks identical. If so, the person on the right is going the wrong way down a one-way street.
 
Last edited: