Post your Infrared Photographs here

At the Reservoir

A
At the Reservoir

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Pawn Shop

A
Pawn Shop

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
The Side of the Church

A
The Side of the Church

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Abandoned Farmhouse

A
Abandoned Farmhouse

  • 2
  • 0
  • 68
TV Dinner

A
TV Dinner

  • 0
  • 0
  • 102

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
184,301
Messages
2,560,388
Members
96,040
Latest member
Lichtschutzfaktor
Recent bookmarks
0

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
45,596
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Post your Infrared photographs here. I have taken them for years but this inspired me to start a thread so people could show off their great work.

Hasselblad 501CM, Distagon 4/50 CFi, Rollei IR400, Hoya R72, DD-X, split-toned.

51082107522_6d9c4f7268_h.jpg
 

Truzi

Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2012
Messages
2,518
Format
Multi Format
Sirius, I came to this site primarily to learn, so haven't looked at the Galleries very often, thus I really can't comment on how active they are.

However, your threads encouraging people to post photos are quite active - I feel they contribute positively to the site.
These, and the "New Old Camera" thread, are the only ones I never fail to view.
 

GLS

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2018
Messages
1,431
Location
England
Format
Multi Format
OK. Here are some more of mine (all created with the Hasselblad and Rollei IR400).

47943260376_33614ec09a_h.jpg


48788989842_5ac814d6a0_h.jpg


49953457766_a244ddd9d7_h.jpg


51035141198_dd55e2ebed_h.jpg


51070812231_135bb87f02_h.jpg
 
OP
OP
Sirius Glass

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
45,596
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
I loved HIE, but after it disappeared I tried several other Infrared films. I like the Rollei IR 400 the best and I use the R25, R29 and 720 filters the best with it. The R23 is a little too weak for IR film, but it darkens the sky without turning it black that the R25 for panchromatic films and is stronger than the Orange filters.
 

Maris

Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2006
Messages
1,423
Location
Noosa, Australia
Format
Multi Format
50021391666_34c7018882_c.jpg

Noosa River from Gympie Tce. infrared
Gelatin-silver photograph on Ilford Classic VC FB photographic paper, image size 16.3cm X 16.3cm, from a Rollei Infrared negative exposed in a Seagull TLR fitted with a IR720 filter.
 

markjwyatt

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 26, 2018
Messages
2,252
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format

BainDarret

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 31, 2011
Messages
347
Location
Ottawa, On
Format
Multi Format
An Infrared Ektachrome from the early 80s and a more recent Rollei IR 400 from the Carp Fair.
MPB60779sm.jpg
sc0266mark.jpg
 

markjwyatt

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 26, 2018
Messages
2,252
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format

BainDarret

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 31, 2011
Messages
347
Location
Ottawa, On
Format
Multi Format
Are you using a 25A with the Rollei IR? R72 or equiv. would make it very difficult to stop action.
I use an R72 with the Rollei IR 400. My exposure with this combo is typically F/6.3 at 1/60th in full sun. I use a Fuji GS645W for IR these days.
 

markjwyatt

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 26, 2018
Messages
2,252
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
I use an R72 with the Rollei IR 400. My exposure with this combo is typically F/6.3 at 1/60th in full sun. I use a Fuji GS645W for IR these days.

Ok, I was typically f11 @ 1/8th of a second. So maybe stop and a half different. I was going for DOF, but since I am finding focus is not an issue (I did not use any IR focus mark/adjustment, which is not present on the C330f anyway), next time I can open up more.
 
OP
OP
Sirius Glass

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
45,596
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
I loved HIE, but after it disappeared I tried several other Infrared films. I like the Rollei IR 400 the best and I use the R25, R29 and 720 filters the best with it. The R23 is a little too weak for IR film, but it darkens the sky without turning it black that the R25 for panchromatic films and is stronger than the Orange filters.

I use the box speed for the light meter and adjust for the filter factor.
 

markjwyatt

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 26, 2018
Messages
2,252
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
I use the box speed for the light meter and adjust for the filter factor.

I have been using an effective ISO of 6 with the 720nm filter on. To Sunny 16, it may be more like ISO 16 (i.e., f11 at 1/8th). So somewhere in that range. What is the filter factor? 20? not sure a filter factor is really accurate (nor is my guessing).
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
43,255
Location
Delta, BC, Canada
Format
Multi Format
The same scene, on SFX, photographed with my C330 metered at box speed without filter, and with R72 filter and two different exposures - six stops more and nine stops more.

upload_2021-3-30_14-37-37.png


and two more scenes with from the same location, on the same roll, with the R72 filter and appropriate exposure adjustments:

upload_2021-3-30_14-41-4.png


upload_2021-3-30_14-41-59.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2021-3-30_14-40-20.png
    upload_2021-3-30_14-40-20.png
    1.4 MB · Views: 76
OP
OP
Sirius Glass

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
45,596
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
I have been using an effective ISO of 6 with the 720nm filter on. To Sunny 16, it may be more like ISO 16 (i.e., f11 at 1/8th). So somewhere in that range. What is the filter factor? 20? not sure a filter factor is really accurate (nor is my guessing).

Using box speed, taking a light reading and adjusting for the filter factor is more accurate that arbitrarily setting an effective ISO. Filter factors are supplied by the manufacturer, who actually know what they are doing, not like the random number pulled out of the air, guessing, without any knowledge.
R23 filter factor 2
R25 filter factor 3
R29 filter factor 4
720 aka 72R filter factor 5​
 

GLS

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2018
Messages
1,431
Location
England
Format
Multi Format
720 aka 72R filter factor 5

My testing of Rollei IR400 tends to bear this out, i.e. I use EI 12 with an R72 filter.

Of course the IR intensity will vary depending on elevation, time of year, cloud cover and so on, so if in doubt bracket.
 

markjwyatt

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 26, 2018
Messages
2,252
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Using box speed, taking a light reading and adjusting for the filter factor is more accurate that arbitrarily setting an effective ISO. Filter factors are supplied by the manufacturer, who actually know what they are doing, not like the random number pulled out of the air, guessing, without any knowledge....
...720 aka 72R filter factor 5​

filter factor =5 (25 A = 8 filter factor) or 5 stops = 32 filter factor? What I used is effectively to 6 or 7 stops (or 64-128 filter factor). I am not finding R72 filter factors on Hoya or any websites. I found one unofficial listing of filter factor=20 to 40 .

I did not make this up, but checked to see what worked with other photographers on Photrio and Flickr, and back calculated filter factors as a check. It made sense that the filter factor for R72 should be higher than 25A, I think. I just found it easier to use effective ISO around 6-16 with the filter on. You end up in a very similar place.

In this image, I did lose a little in the highlights, but also in the shadows and the flat black fence (not surprising). The normal parts of the image (i.e., non- vegetative, NIR reflecting) have very normal looking densities. The negatives are not dense (nor thin).
 
Last edited:
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom