This is not necessarily correct. When I was doing testing with RA4 safelight intensities, there turned out to be quite a wide range of light levels where there was no fogging of paper whites, but a pronounced color cast that could not be filtered away entirely. The same is true for off-spec chemistry; there's a bandwidth where paper whites remain white, but color balance cannot be adjusted properly. HOWEVER, generally you move outside that bandwidth (both with light fogging and the chemistry issue) occasionally, resulting in seemingly isolated incidences of more visible problems that ultimately give away the problem. Still, don't rely on paper whites telling the full story with RA4. It's a good clue, but not the only one.
Please help. Insufficient color filtration.
-
A
- Thread starter Konalog
- Start date
Recent Classifieds
-
For Sale Awesome Agfa Ambi Silette 3 Lens Outfit
- Started by pdccamerqs
-
For Sale For Sale or Trade! Schneider 65mm f/8 Super Angulon
- Started by pdccamerqs
-
Sold 4X5, 5X7 film
- Started by nsurit
Forum statistics
This is not necessarily correct. When I was doing testing with RA4 safelight intensities, there turned out to be quite a wide range of light levels where there was no fogging of paper whites, but a pronounced color cast that could not be filtered away entirely. The same is true for off-spec chemistry; there's a bandwidth where paper whites remain white, but color balance cannot be adjusted properly. HOWEVER, generally you move outside that bandwidth (both with light fogging and the chemistry issue) occasionally, resulting in seemingly isolated incidences of more visible problems that ultimately give away the problem. Still, don't rely on paper whites telling the full story with RA4. It's a good clue, but not the only one.
MattKing
Moderator
Is there any possibility that someone has swapped out the dichroic filters with the wrong filters?
Or even switched them around - for example, the M control adjusts the Cyan filter, and vice-versa?
Or even switched them around - for example, the M control adjusts the Cyan filter, and vice-versa?
Sure. Extraordinary circumstances. This is not chemistry or safelights. Something is dramatically wrong.
I remember the good old days when you bought a box of Kodak Ektacolor paper, there was a recommended starting filter pack, you dialed in (or assembled the acetate filters) and you would get a pretty good print right off. No safelights, Kodak chemistry, bingo.
I would make sure that the filters are actually intact and that the white light switch is off.
I would make sure that the filters are actually intact and that the white light switch is off.
Well the difference between your 2 pics brbo does look pretty clear and would appear to fly in the face of Matt's statement about an IR filter It's always disconcerting when this happens. I hope there is a means of reconciling what seems to be exact opposites.
pentaxuser
pentaxuser
MattKing
Moderator
It probably differs based on the light system and IR filter employed. The ones I've encountered in the past didn't show nearly as much difference. In any event, the OP's problem as described in this thread aren't likely to arise because of a properly configured IR filter in the light path. Perhaps there are other light path filters that could cause those problems, and be put in there by mistake, but I can't think of what they would be.
Yes, that was when the air was clean and words were dirty. :sigh
MattKing
Moderator
And before they were able to make paper whose recommended filtration didn't vary from batch to batch - which is/was until recently the situation.
The last box of Kodak color paper I bought, at least 15 years ago still had a starting filter pack, it was a great place to start.
Way back, 1970's, Kodacolor-X, practically, using, recommended filter pack, and a 212 bulb, perfect prints were easy.
Way back, 1970's, Kodacolor-X, practically, using, recommended filter pack, and a 212 bulb, perfect prints were easy.
Hi thank you for help with this. I can see how someone might overlook this feature to remove all filters from the light path, and return to their previously set positions. This feature is working properly on my enlarger head, and have tested several times, however don't ever really use it otherwise. I did solve the problem - detailed in my next post.
The position of the bulb was apparently the cause my issue. I'm rather dumbfounded to think how such a tiny, near imperceptible hardware malalignment could have such a dramatic effect. Regardless, the color head now appears to be functioning as it should. The print here was made w/ M65, Y72.5, C0, and (thankfully!) no gels. Original view through viewfinder shown for comparison. While this print is underexposed/low density, and has perhaps a touch of magenta, it at least confirms that the problem is resolved. Thank you all very much again for your helpful ideas.
Attachments
Thanks!
Victory!!
Well the OP got his money's worth investing in APUG Photrio.
MattKing
Moderator
Great news!
Freedom!!
Indeed.
Thx again! Hopefully someone else can benefit from this thread.
Real made in Mexico with sugar. Delightful!
| Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:  |