Nikon RF

Forum statistics

Threads
198,314
Messages
2,772,769
Members
99,593
Latest member
StephenWu
Recent bookmarks
0
OP
OP
ColColt

ColColt

Member
Joined
May 26, 2015
Messages
1,824
Location
TN
Format
Multi Format
I sprung for that CLA'd S2 tonight...Sulfate made me do it.
 

rwreich

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2012
Messages
344
Location
Greensboro, NC
Format
Multi Format
Ah, as it turns out, mine is 6160xxx - so, a little later than I was thinking. Still, for a beautiful, all-mechanical, 60 year old camera, mine is really perfect... I hope I'm just as "operational" when I'm sixty!
 
OP
OP
ColColt

ColColt

Member
Joined
May 26, 2015
Messages
1,824
Location
TN
Format
Multi Format
60's not bad for us, I'm 70 and still kicking!! Cameras...well, could be good or bad depending on availability of parts and service. We've got the F2 series covered with Sover Wong and several for the Leica but the Nikon RF, I'm not sure.
 

rwreich

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2012
Messages
344
Location
Greensboro, NC
Format
Multi Format
I've posted this elsewhere on APUG, but i like to keep my S2 in good company and I carry it everywhere.

image.jpeg
 
OP
OP
ColColt

ColColt

Member
Joined
May 26, 2015
Messages
1,824
Location
TN
Format
Multi Format
Looks mighty fine. I have some PanF in the bag I haven't tried yet along with enough FP-4 to last me till Christmas. My "fast" film is usually Tri-X, HP-5 or RPX-400.

I'm hoping this one is going to be a good one and should be as it was recently CLA'd by DAG.
 

Theo Sulphate

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
6,489
Location
Gig Harbor
Format
Multi Format
I was hoping you'd spring for the Contax...

That's ok; the Nikon is far more reliable and easier to work on.
 

rwreich

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2012
Messages
344
Location
Greensboro, NC
Format
Multi Format
That film stash is a hodge podge of HP5+ (which I develop and print in my basement darkroom as is the case with all my B/W), Portra 400, PanF, Ektar 100, and Delta 3200.

I also carry a Sekonic L-398a (batteries not required), a small rocket blower, and a sharpie marker in that bag.

Point is, the S2 is really useful in addition to being easy on the eyes.
 
OP
OP
ColColt

ColColt

Member
Joined
May 26, 2015
Messages
1,824
Location
TN
Format
Multi Format
I was hoping you'd spring for the Contax...

They're probably a great camera but I never liked the looks as much. Who knows down the road....

Point is, the S2 is really useful in addition to being easy on the eyes.

How do you like the lens?
 

rwreich

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2012
Messages
344
Location
Greensboro, NC
Format
Multi Format
My copy has a subtle glow wide-open that transitions into crisp sharpness by f/2.8. Here's a print that I made (still wet in this image) at f/2.8, I think. I only have seceral hundred negarives that need to be printed, so only time will tell.

image.jpeg
 
OP
OP
ColColt

ColColt

Member
Joined
May 26, 2015
Messages
1,824
Location
TN
Format
Multi Format
Looks like it was done in the 50's...toned?
 

rwreich

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2012
Messages
344
Location
Greensboro, NC
Format
Multi Format
Yes, in selenium. The lights in my basement might be funky, though.

For a normal 50mm, it has a character that is far from clinical. That's kinda why I fell in love with it, too. I was looking for an experience that would be notably different from my "electronic" kit. Even my FM2n feels too cloaely related to the unmentionable sometimes. This S2 is different. It's harder (slower) to use, but it feels so much more rewarding. When I shoot with this camera, I really sense that faith plays such a big role... Faith in my ability to read the scene, in my equipment, in my vision, and in my abikity to render a finished product. When I look at a print from the S2, I think, "I made that by hand from start to finish," and that is so much more rewarding than any camera that tries to 'think' for itself.
 
OP
OP
ColColt

ColColt

Member
Joined
May 26, 2015
Messages
1,824
Location
TN
Format
Multi Format
I've read this is the "Holy Grail" of Nikon Rangefinders. I guess I'll find out late next week when it hopefully will be here for the weekend. Making prints from negatives you've developed yourself was always such a great revelation to me, slowly watching the image appear and finally when you could turn the lights on...nothing more satisfying, IMHO.
 

rwreich

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2012
Messages
344
Location
Greensboro, NC
Format
Multi Format
I've read this is the "Holy Grail" of Nikon Rangefinders. I guess I'll find out late next week when it hopefully will be here for the weekend. Making prints from negatives you've developed yourself was always such a great revelation to me, slowly watching the image appear and finally when you could turn the lights on...nothing more satisfying, IMHO.

Agreed!

As a point to consider, I wonder if the shutter speed must be set after winding the shutters, or if it matters.
 

Theo Sulphate

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
6,489
Location
Gig Harbor
Format
Multi Format
My copy has a subtle glow wide-open that transitions into crisp sharpness by f/2.8. Here's a print that I made (still wet in this image) at f/2.8, I think. I only have seceral hundred negarives that need to be printed, so only time will tell.

View attachment 157363

A very charming photo. You're right, it's definitely not clinical or electronic-looking. It's sharp, but there's a pleasing overall "softness" of a different form. I can't put it into words, but I like the effect.
 

rwreich

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2012
Messages
344
Location
Greensboro, NC
Format
Multi Format
A very charming photo. You're right, it's definitely not clinical or electronic-looking. It's sharp, but there's a pleasing overall "softness" of a different form. I can't put it into words, but I like the effect.

Many thanks! One "benefit" of a rangefinder design like the S2 is that the imprecise framing (because of paralax) and lack ofTTL preview means every frame is at least a slight unknown.
 
OP
OP
ColColt

ColColt

Member
Joined
May 26, 2015
Messages
1,824
Location
TN
Format
Multi Format
As a point to consider, I wonder if the shutter speed must be set after winding the shutters, or if it matters.

I don't recall seeing anything about that in the manual I downloaded. You have one, do it both ways and see.

One "benefit" of a rangefinder design like the S2 is that the imprecise framing (because of paralax) and lack ofTTL preview means every frame is at least a slight unknown.

Would that not be applicable for any rangefinder, such as the Leica M? I've had no problem with those.
 

rwreich

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2012
Messages
344
Location
Greensboro, NC
Format
Multi Format
I had one bad frame back in December and I later ran a test roll where every shot was at 1/1000. Every single frame was perfect, so I wondered if I had caused the problem by changing speeds before winding. I had read that regarding other cameras from the era (but not the Leica) so it made me curious. From then on, I've been winding the film and then changing speeds to avoid any potential issues.

Yes, that would be applicable to all rangefinders, but this was my first one and I wasn't accustomed to it. I've been using SLRs my whole life - minolta, nikon, pentax, mamiya - so this was just very different. in an SLR, I see the picture before I take it. With the S2 and other rangefinders, I have to imagine what it will be like.
 
OP
OP
ColColt

ColColt

Member
Joined
May 26, 2015
Messages
1,824
Location
TN
Format
Multi Format
I think I'd try that again to see if you got similar results. I don't know why changing the shutter speed before/after winding would matter. I didn't see any warning to that effect in the manual.
 
OP
OP
ColColt

ColColt

Member
Joined
May 26, 2015
Messages
1,824
Location
TN
Format
Multi Format
I just read this about the S2..."You can only set shutter speeds with the shutter cocked, etc." Is that true? That wasn't from the manual.
 

rwreich

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2012
Messages
344
Location
Greensboro, NC
Format
Multi Format
Well, in practice, it isn't really a big deal. You'll see when you start winding yours that the shutter speed dial is directly linked to the winding mechanism and that the shutter speed indicator will only appear to point to the correct speed when the shutter is cocked. So, after a week or so, you'll just start doing it that way without any issues. You wind the film and select the shutter speed for your next shot. If you're using the same shutter speed, then it's already on the previous setting. I don't know if it affects the shutters' timing, but it does make a difference in the display.

Is this not true of the screw mount Leicas, too?
 
OP
OP
ColColt

ColColt

Member
Joined
May 26, 2015
Messages
1,824
Location
TN
Format
Multi Format
I don't know as I've never had the screw mount type, just the M's. It may take a bit of getting use to, especially the rotating shutter indicator so, I need to remember to keep my paws off of it. :smile:
 
OP
OP
ColColt

ColColt

Member
Joined
May 26, 2015
Messages
1,824
Location
TN
Format
Multi Format
Checking it out now-thank you very much.
 
OP
OP
ColColt

ColColt

Member
Joined
May 26, 2015
Messages
1,824
Location
TN
Format
Multi Format
Interesting. I've never seen a RF operate like that. It appears it's best to wind the film before setting the shutter speed.
 

rwreich

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2012
Messages
344
Location
Greensboro, NC
Format
Multi Format
Yes, and it becomes intuitive to work that way after just a short time. I want to post another video about how to load film, but my internet connection is quite slow at the moment. Manually winding the shutter with the knob instead of the film advance lever is a very convenient way to do double exposures.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom