Motion Picture Film Used As Stills. Post Results Here.

[Cholentpot]

Nikon N80, 50 1.8, 250D

 

[Cholentpot]

Nikon N80, 24-50, 250D

No, I didn't match the color balance. No one is making me.

 

[blee1996]

I don't know if cine Ektachrome count or not. Recently I bought a few rolls of Euphoric 100 (re-spooled Ektachrome E100D) from Atlanta Film Co. And here are a few shots from the first roll. Nikon FA, 75-150/3.5 Series-E lens, Tetenal E6 home processed.

Red bench at fishing pier - Nikon_FA_75150_Euphoric100_003 by Zheng, on Flickr

Lone black bird - Nikon_FA_75150_Euphoric100_009 by Zheng, on Flickr

Autumn yellow and blue - Nikon_FA_75150_Euphoric100_013 by Zheng, on Flickr

Egret hunting near sunset - Nikon_FA_75150_Euphoric100_019 by Zheng, on Flickr

 

[blee1996]

And a few ECN-2 processed Kodak Vision 3. I felt the raw out of scanner tend to be quite flat and muted, so it is more of a starting point for grading afterwards.

500T is my favorite, since there is no direct comparison in C41.

Walking home near sunset by Zheng, on Flickr

Red jet piercing the night - London4_500T_005 by Zheng, on Flickr

50D is great for bright outdoors

Man with hat - Boardwalk_250D_024 by Zheng, on Flickr

 

[Alan Edward Klein]

Cinematic-type film is very true to color like Portra.

 

[Donald Qualls]

Cinematic-type film is very true to color like Portra.

Well, it is after it's been printed to release stock, or scanned and corrected in post, or you've got your filter settings ironed out in the RA-4 darkroom. But then, the same is true of Portra, so I guess you're correct...

 

[koraks]

or you've got your filter settings ironed out in the RA-4 darkroom

I wish I ever managed that.

 

[Donald Qualls]

I wish I ever managed that.

Well, don't read too much into it, I'm still trying to get my color head into fully usable condition.

 

[VinceInMT]

Back in '73 I bought a roll of Kodak 5254. It was rated for tungsten and while I don't remember the speed, I shot a roll and sent it off for processing. They returned negatives and mounted slides. Here are some scans of the negatives.

 

[Nokton48]

SONY DSC by Nokton48, on Flickr

Kodak 2402 Plus-X Aerographic Five Inch Perforated, comes in a 350 foot roll. Cut the film in the dark to fit a 5x7 Lisco Holder, then exposed in a 5x7 Sinar Norma, with my 500mm f5.5 Schneider Tele-Xenar. Developed in D23 1:1, loaded into an 8x10 Unicolor Print Drum, and spun on a Unicolor Uniroller. Negative shot at F32 using Broncolor strobes Kelly Portrait lighting. Will be contact printing this, then will enlarge it a bit to check detail. The 500mm lens I have had CLA'ed it is mounted in a Compound #5. I also exposed more film at F22, I will develop that a bit less, to see the differences.

 

[Cholentpot]

Yashica 44, Orwo UN-54. Check out the BH perfs.

 

[VinceInMT]

Minolta 16P, Eastman Double-X

 

[Sirius Glass]

Back in '73 I bought a roll of Kodak 5254. It was rated for tungsten and while I don't remember the speed, I shot a roll and sent it off for processing. They returned negatives and mounted slides. Here are some scans of the negatives.View attachment 322080

She seems to have aged well on the old film stock, ya think?

 

[Cholentpot]

Minolta 16P, Eastman Double-X

35mm has different perfs than smaller and larger formats of MP film. It's interesting to compare.

 

[VinceInMT]

She seems to have aged well on the old film stock, ya think?

I hadn’t seen her in almost 50 years but crossed paths recently and time has been kind.

 

[Sirius Glass]

I hadn’t seen her in almost 50 years but crossed paths recently and time has been kind.

 

[awty]

Vision 2363 @ iso 1.6
Still trying to work it out, have 100' roll to do so.

Nikon F4, 50mm f1.4 D

 

[Cholentpot]

Vision 2363 @ iso 1.6
Still trying to work it out, have 100' roll to do so.

Nikon F4, 50mm f1.4 D

View attachment 322269

View attachment 322270

View attachment 322271

View attachment 322272

Bluuuuuuuueee

 

[Sirius Glass]

Bluuuuuuuueee

That could be reciprocity failure due to a longer exposure.

 

[MattKing]

Bluuuuuuuueee

That is a projection print stock, designed for tungsten contact exposure from a masked camera stock original.
Kind of supposed to be blue.

 

[Cholentpot]

That is a projection print stock, designed for tungsten contact exposure from a masked camera stock original.
Kind of supposed to be blue.

Kind Of Blue.

 

[awty]

Bluuuuuuuueee

That's the colour of my room.

Worse comes to worse I can print in B&W, has similar appearance to Rollie RPX25

 

[Cholentpot]

That's the colour of my room.

Worse comes to worse I can print in B&W, has similar appearance to Rollie RPX25

Never said I had an issue with it. It looks pretty snazzy honestly.

 

[awty]

Never said I had an issue with it. It looks pretty snazzy honestly.

Bubbles bath house is always snazzy.

 

[snusmumriken]

Started experimentally using Eastman Double-X in October, various light conditions.