Large Format X-Ray Photo

Shadow 2

A
Shadow 2

  • 0
  • 0
  • 16
Shadow 1

A
Shadow 1

  • 2
  • 0
  • 17
Darkroom c1972

A
Darkroom c1972

  • 1
  • 2
  • 31
Tōrō

H
Tōrō

  • 4
  • 0
  • 39

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,826
Messages
2,781,478
Members
99,718
Latest member
nesunoio
Recent bookmarks
0

Andrew O'Neill

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
11,977
Location
Coquitlam,BC Canada
Format
Multi Format
Sorry, but no. X-rays have shorter wavelength than UV, much shorter than visible light. This equates to higher energy per photon, which is part of why they penetrate more than visible light (another way to look at this is that there are few electrons in most solids that can absorb a photon at such a short wavelength). Their resolving power, however, is much finer than visible; that's why x-rays are used to lay down the traces on integrated circuits that need to be smaller than a wavelength of visible light.

I wouldn't expect X-ray film to have less resolution than camera film, either. It's slow, which mean fine grain. Lack of sharpness, when present, is entirely due to the second emulsion on double-sided films -- the back side gets an exposure that's slightly diffused by the translucent emulsion on the front, like putting a frosted acetate over your negative and a clear one under to get an unsharp mask. If you could make the second emulsion's exposure and contrast enough lower than those of the front, you'd get a built-in USM with double-sided x-ray film.

For USM to work properly, the backside second emulsion would need to be a soft positive image.
I have stripped that backside emulsion after development, and the image is a bit sharper looking... and grainier. If you read the densities before and after stripping, the stripped version has exactly half the density. My understanding is the second emulsion is only there to increase the speed, or the sensitivity of the film when exposed with screens.
 
OP
OP
Nokton48

Nokton48

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2006
Messages
2,990
Format
Multi Format
Seen the title I am utmost disappointed. No X-ray exposure...

Yes, I really expected that you had added an X-ray apparatus to your stuff.


Sir, you flatter me. Thank you.
 

Cholentpot

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2015
Messages
6,743
Format
35mm
Can someone point me to which films are single sided? Fuji HR-U which is cheap and plentiful, is this single or double. What Fuji line is single coating if any?
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,935
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Mammography films are more likely to be single sided.
 

Cholentpot

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2015
Messages
6,743
Format
35mm
Mammography films are more likely to be single sided.

Is there a emulsion name or producer for it? If I google Mammography films I get a bunch of info about the process and photos of the x-rays but no names of the film or places it's sold.

Just Google it!

It's not that simple anymore. Depending on device and location and even time the results will be different. You think I'm asking because I haven't tried google already?
 

Andrew O'Neill

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
11,977
Location
Coquitlam,BC Canada
Format
Multi Format
Is there a emulsion name or producer for it? If I google Mammography films I get a bunch of info about the process and photos of the x-rays but no names of the film or places it's sold.



It's not that simple anymore. Depending on device and location and even time the results will be different. You think I'm asking because I haven't tried google already?

Check out Carestream, for one. You can find info on spectral sensitivity, film curves, which is single or double-sided, etc etc. Also, I believe I posted two vendors you can get film from. ZZ Medical, and CXS Online.
 

Cholentpot

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2015
Messages
6,743
Format
35mm
Check out Carestream, for one. You can find info on spectral sensitivity, film curves, which is single or double-sided, etc etc. Also, I believe I posted two vendors you can get film from. ZZ Medical, and CXS Online.

Thanks.

Google diving brought me info that said mamo film is generally one sided emulsion.

Cheapest film I've found yet is 8x10 Fuji Green HR-U film 100 sheets for about $36 shipped off Ebay.
 

Andrew O'Neill

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
11,977
Location
Coquitlam,BC Canada
Format
Multi Format
Thanks.

Google diving brought me info that said mamo film is generally one sided emulsion.

Cheapest film I've found yet is 8x10 Fuji Green HR-U film 100 sheets for about $36 shipped off Ebay.

Yes, usually mammography xray usually is single-sided. The Fuji Green HR-U is great stuff, and you cannot beat that price! If you find you like it, it's a good idea to stock up on it. Who knows how much longer it'll be around, or will stay cheap.
 

Cholentpot

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2015
Messages
6,743
Format
35mm
Yes, usually mammography xray usually is single-sided. The Fuji Green HR-U is great stuff, and you cannot beat that price! If you find you like it, it's a good idea to stock up on it. Who knows how much longer it'll be around, or will stay cheap.

Knowing my luck it'll be gone as soon as I learn it and then price will skyrocket.

The Fuji HR-U is doublesided?
 
OP
OP
Nokton48

Nokton48

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2006
Messages
2,990
Format
Multi Format
Yes HR-U is double sided.
Today I paid $28 plus actual shipping and tax per 100 8x10 sheets.
I buy from Ebay vendor Xrayexpress
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
Nokton48

Nokton48

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2006
Messages
2,990
Format
Multi Format
And now for something completely different........... :smile:

Kodak Min-R Single Sided Mammography 18x24cm by Nokton48, on Flickr

This is single sided 18x24cm Mammography XRay I found a while back. I do have one Sinar Norma 18x24 film holder, so this will make nice sized contact prints.

The big bonus is that I can cut it into four 9x12cm to fit my European holders and cameras.

25 cents a sheet for single sided 18x24. Looks like these came from France.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
Nokton48

Nokton48

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2006
Messages
2,990
Format
Multi Format
Nope not yet

8x10 Norma has not seen any action for a while. I'm working on it

I make RC B&W prints and scan those
 

Cholentpot

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2015
Messages
6,743
Format
35mm
On the subject of safe-ing a room for cutting up X-ray film. I have a safelight but I'm unsure if it's ok for film.

Here's a photo of the thing, I found it at a garage sale in Buffalo many moons ago.

7OYAis0.jpg


wckPg9M.jpg


Kjpqnn5.jpg


I've used to for paper with no issues. I guess I should swap out those 25w GEs for something a little lesser? Maybe chuck this in a corner far far away from where I plan on cutting.
 
OP
OP
Nokton48

Nokton48

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2006
Messages
2,990
Format
Multi Format
The Lowes $6.98 3 watt LED should do the job? Three watt bulbs are not that easy to find!

https://www.lowes.com/pd/Energetic-Watt-EQ-A19-Red-LED-Light-Bulb/1000623747

You should then have about what I have (which I know works) depending on how much filtering that red cover provides.

I keep mine at least 6 feet away from cutter and trays with no fogging high speed film so far. It also provides a very decent amount of light
 
Joined
Dec 10, 2009
Messages
6,297
Format
Multi Format
4x5 Fuji HRU Mic-X 5 minutes by Nokton48, on Flickr

My first Sinar Norma 4x5 photo in twenty five years taken yesterday. Fuji 8x10 HR-U X-Ray cut down to 4x5, Graphmatic Holder, 4x5 Sinar Norma 180mm f5.6 chrome Durst Componon lens, full key sun. This was exposure #6, two stops over ambient reading of grey card EI 50 TTL Sinarsix 1/15 @ Fll. Short development is stock Legacy Mic-X 5 minutes 68F. Cesco flat bottomed 8x10 tray, sheets developed singly. I did a sort of ring-around, varying exposure and development times. This is the lowest contrast version which I like.

8x10 Arista RC #2 Multigrade dev Omega DII with Omegalite circuline head

Cool thing is this works out to about 7 cents per 4x5 sheet. I may load up the truck :smile:

Please post your large format X-Ray photos here :smile:

Nice photo! I ran out of Fuji HRT and got a box of HRU. I ran into the same problem with high contrast and short development times. It's really constrasty stuff. I processed it in Rodinal 1:100 at 68° for 6 minutes. I pre-wet the film first. Anything red and oranges will become darker since it's not panchromatic but green sensitive. I'm experimenting processing it in POTA for about 6 minutes.
 

Cholentpot

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2015
Messages
6,743
Format
35mm
The Lowes $6.98 3 watt LED should do the job? Three watt bulbs are not that easy to find!

https://www.lowes.com/pd/Energetic-Watt-EQ-A19-Red-LED-Light-Bulb/1000623747

You should then have about what I have (which I know works) depending on how much filtering that red cover provides.

I keep mine at least 6 feet away from cutter and trays with no fogging high speed film so far. It also provides a very decent amount of light

Ebay has them for a half dollar more. I assume you use a single bulb.
 
OP
OP
Nokton48

Nokton48

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2006
Messages
2,990
Format
Multi Format
Loading Up The Truck Fuji XRay by Nokton48, on Flickr

OK HR-U is going to work for me in the larger formats. So I am loading up the truck as I have no idea how long it is going to be available. Not bad at $28 a box.

400 8x10 sheets of HR-U plus the hundred I already have. Hopefully a lifetime supply. While I was at it I grabbed a hundred sheets of RX-N, which is the blue two sided high speed Fuji XRay film.

Great fun ahead I predict. I loaded four 4x5 Graphmatics, and four 2x3 Graphmatics, with HR-U this morning.


XRay Films for 8x10 13x18 5x7 Sinar Normas by Nokton48, on Flickr
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
Nokton48

Nokton48

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2006
Messages
2,990
Format
Multi Format
Nice photo! I ran out of Fuji HRT and got a box of HRU. I ran into the same problem with high contrast and short development times. It's really constrasty stuff. I processed it in Rodinal 1:100 at 68° for 6 minutes. I pre-wet the film first. Anything red and oranges will become darker since it's not panchromatic but green sensitive. I'm experimenting processing it in POTA for about 6 minutes.

Mainecoonmaniac,
Thank you for your contribution regarding the HR-U.
Anybody with first hand experience please contribute :smile:
And also Thanks Andy for your many contributions.

It sounds like more testing is in order, I like the idea of using yellow and green filters with HR-U.
The Freestyle Legacy Mic-X replenished seems to be doing the job for me so far.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom