Kodak Polytoner and alternative sepia/sulfide toners

Lowland Forest

H
Lowland Forest

  • 0
  • 0
  • 4
Sonatas XII-76 (Faith)

A
Sonatas XII-76 (Faith)

  • 0
  • 1
  • 53
Mass

A
Mass

  • 2
  • 2
  • 71
Still life at moot bar

A
Still life at moot bar

  • 2
  • 0
  • 55
untitled

A
untitled

  • 2
  • 0
  • 54

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
200,173
Messages
2,802,918
Members
100,144
Latest member
elephants?
Recent bookmarks
0

skahde

Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2004
Messages
601
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
There may be a substantial difference, whether you use this substitute directly or indirectly. Used directly the Ammonium Thiosulfate probably doesn't hurt at all, whereas it could make indirect toning a gamble.

As I always used it directly, that was never a question to me. But if you want to work indirectly, you can just split the steps and never join the components for sulfur and selenium in the first place which also adds some more freedom which to some may cause insecurity whereas others just squeeze it until it's lemonade.
 
Joined
Jul 28, 2016
Messages
2,890
Location
India
Format
Multi Format
Joined
Jul 28, 2016
Messages
2,890
Location
India
Format
Multi Format
Not very diligently, but I did dunk one or two small lith test prints into this toner. It seemed to work just fine!

Maybe a little more detail: I tried the preparation made from sodium sulfite and plain sulfur, as well as the sulfer + sodium hydroxide preparation. Both in fairly random dilutions of something like 1+50 or so, as a direct toner, on small lith prints. The lith prints were on Fomatone and pink-ish to begin with. Toning was very swift; I totally overshot the mark with the first one within a minute, turning the pink into a dull brown. The other print I treated more carefully (I think the toner was more dilute as well; I was winging it really) and shifted more subtly. The smell was typical rotten egg and quite powerful at that.

That's indeed very encouraging! Thanks.
 
Last edited:

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
24,574
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
Maybe a little more detail: I tried the preparation made from sodium sulfite and plain sulfur, as well as the sulfer + sodium hydroxide preparation. Both in fairly random dilutions of something like 1+50 or so, as a direct toner, on small lith prints. The lith prints were on Fomatone and pink-ish to begin with. Toning was very swift; I totally overshot the mark with the first one within a minute, turning the pink into a dull brown. The other print I treated more carefully (I think the toner was more dilute as well; I was winging it really) and shifted more subtly. The smell was typical rotten egg and quite powerful at that.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom