Kodachrome as B&W Neg

Brentwood Kebab!

A
Brentwood Kebab!

  • 0
  • 0
  • 31
Summer Lady

A
Summer Lady

  • 0
  • 0
  • 36
DINO Acting Up !

A
DINO Acting Up !

  • 0
  • 0
  • 24
What Have They Seen?

A
What Have They Seen?

  • 0
  • 0
  • 34
Lady With Attitude !

A
Lady With Attitude !

  • 0
  • 0
  • 36

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,763
Messages
2,780,547
Members
99,700
Latest member
Harryyang
Recent bookmarks
0

ssloansjca

Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2005
Messages
120
Location
San Jose, CA
Format
35mm
I have some exposed PKR120 that I want to try to save the images on. It has been kept deep frozen for a very long time. Is there any information on how to process this as a B&W Neg Film anywhere?

I hear it requires a high contrast developer like D19???


~Steve Sloan
 
Joined
Oct 11, 2008
Messages
97
Location
Finland
Format
Multi Format
I'd suggest you get some KR in 35mm format, make lots of identical exposures at ISO 64, and process them in different ways, to see which method yields the best results for you. Then use that for your 120 film.

Some things you need to know about: Kodachrome has a remjet backing which needs to be removed either before processing (preferable, if you can manage it in total darkness) or after. Secondly, there's a yellow filter in the film that you cannot get rid of if you process into a negative. Thus the negatives might be hard to print from optically, but they should scan fine. If you do reversal processing, the yellow filter will go away.

Good luck!
 

nickandre

Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2007
Messages
1,918
Location
Seattle WA
Format
Medium Format
You'll need to compensate for spped loss. Generally it needs to be processed as a positive reversal. This is tricky because you don't know how it has fared. There are directions, but you need to remove the remjet backing using a solution of sodium sulfite (1 T per liter) and then develop in D19. You bleach it and clear it, and then re expose to room light. Then develop in anything (reuse the d19) for the positive image. If you're off you won't get good images and blow the highlights or shadows. It's risky at best.
 

John W

Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2008
Messages
128
Location
Seattle, WA
Format
4x5 Format
I've read recommendations for Rocky Mountain Film for old film processing services. You'll need to contact them to discuss processing options for your particular film; for some Kodachrome films/formats they process to color slides, but for others the only remaining option is to process to B&W as you suggested.
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,974
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
I noticed that we don't seem to have a thread dedicated to this topic (if we do, please link to it, and we can merge it), and I suspect it will now become quite important, so I've retitled this thread that was originally about Kodachrome 120 for general discussion of processing Kodachrome as B&W neg and made it a sticky.

Anyone with some actual experience shooting Kodachrome as b/w neg? If my K64 didn't make it to Dwayne's in time, I might need to know!
 

michaelbsc

Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2007
Messages
2,103
Location
South Caroli
Format
Multi Format
Hey, I've got a whole brick of 120 in the freezer. I'm just waiting for the opportunity to kidnap PE and tie him in the barn until he figures out how to do it as color reversal using two sticks.

In the mean time, I'll bet DR5 knows how.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

nickrapak

Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
740
Location
Horsham, PA
Format
Multi Format
The next two posts are information from Martin Baumgarten of Plattsburgh Photographic Services. It is intended to deal with cine film, but most of this applies to still film as well.
[1 of 2]

Martin Baumgarten said:
---> KODACHROME Processed as Black & White <----- [October 2010]

Yes, KODACHROME can be processed as Black & White, I do it all the time here. In fact, in default, so can virtually ALL photographic films. KODACHROME is a triple layer matrixed B&W film in reality [matrixed with gelatin filter layers for the 3 primary colors], and color dyes are added by 3 separate Color Developers relative to the formation of the Positive silver during the reversal process. All black metallic silver is removed during the Bleach and Fixer stages in the end, leaving only the positive color dyes. There's more to it than that, but that's it in a nutshell for this part of my answer.

Since KODACHROME is really only a B&W film, it is most often processed as a B&W Negative, usually done for all the old K-12 films and K-14 films that were exposed years ago but never processed. They have to be done as a Negative, since Reversal processing would leave a faint muddy image if anything at all, due to the severity of the age fog in the film. This is what is done for such old films here at PPS, at Film Rescue, and also at Rocky Mountain Film Lab (if they're still operating these days). To save images from those old films, that is the only way to process them, using a high contrast technical developer adjusted for the age of the film, and any resulting images then transferred to a video format (nominally DVD) and returned to the customer along with the film original.

However, IF the film is good stock, meaning having been cold stored since new and virtually as good as new, OR film of recent manufacture...... it can be processed as EITHER a Negative or Positive (via B&W Reversal processing). What does it look like? Pretty good if the film has been cold-stored. As a Negative, depending on what developer is used, it will have nice even tones and can be used to telecine the images just as with any negative stock. As a Positive image, done via B&W Reversal processing, the film looks pretty good, but is grainier than what we're used to expect out of KODACHROME. The reason is because processed as Color Reversal, the dyes overlap each other and are themselves virtually devoid of grain. The grain we see is the ghost image of the grain from the original B&W Positive image that is necessary to create the Color Dye image. So, yes, it's pretty good, just grainier, and grainier than PLUS-X 7276 or 7265......but less grainy than TRI-X 7278 or 7266.

This is one reason I'm not worried about using up my KMA Sound filmstock, since it can still be processed as B&W and I'd rather have B&W Sound film, than no sound film at all; or try to race and use up what I have just to use it up and have to pay all the processing costs to do that, without really having enough time to use it properly for some project. But it is somewhat expensive to have it processed this way at any of the labs, unless you wish to tackle it yourself...which is quite doable if you have the equipment: processing tank system, film rewind setup, darkroom trays, photograde sponge (to physically wipe the remjet off with the Borax Bath solution), chemistry etc.

Also, done as B&W Reversal, it can also be Sepia toned just like the other B&W Reversal films, and that gives it a nice look. I'll try to run some tests here when I get out of this busy holiday photography season, and post some frame grab results. Lastly, since the film is silver-rich, it really needs the previous B&W Reversal process........otherwise, if using the D-94a and new Bleach, you'd have to make some adjustments to the Development time and also extend the Bleaching time out. There's some other factors involved here as well in processing, development time aside....and the worst factor is the removal of the Remjet Anti-Halation Backing, which when processing manually, must be done after processing, and slowly by hand using a Borax bath, and then a rewash afterward. A reminder here though, if you have old films that were shot long ago, or just old film that you might want to use that was NOT cold stored.....forget about processing it as reversal; it will just be muddy nothing or very very poor.

AND.....when processing OLD films, the darn remjet backing is very stubborn and you really have to work at getting it all off; meaning a long soak in the Borax Bath [10 to 20 minutes average] to help loosen it, and usually giving the film two wiping passes to get it all off. And even then, you might still have some streaks of it here and there. In the K-12 and K-14 processing machines, they use not only solution but soft buffer rollers rotating at high speed to help clear all this off and then a spray rinse to remove residual traces as the film passes through that stage of processing (done prior to actual developing).

Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Martin Baumgarten
 

nickrapak

Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
740
Location
Horsham, PA
Format
Multi Format
[2 of 2]

Martin Baumgarten said:
The process I use depends on the type and age of the KODACHROME film I am developing. For very old KODACHROME-II films and very old KMA-40 films, they are processed to a B&W Negative using conventional KODAK D-19 technical developer, with time and temperature based on what information the customer has provided to me about age and storage history. Otherwise, for most films exposed prior to 1985, I will process the films not longer than 3 minutes and at 68 F (20 C), with first having a 2 minute prewash stage. I used to use an anti-fog agent, but have not really noticed any benefit to doing so for very old films that suffer from severe age fog. Afterall, that silver has been ionized and will react to development, and no chemical added can distinguish between silver that has reacted to light energy or to radiant energy.

If a batch of films come in, I will test one first, and base the processing on my results. If films are severely age fogged, I will often lower the Developer temperature down to about 65 F so that I can still keep development time in the 2 min to 4 range. It's a delicate balance between getting images and getting nothing. You have to be careful to not make the times so short that you'll just get cloudiness in the images with little detail. Some films are so severe that to the eye, it looks like the film is completely black. But upon examination under a strong light, you will see the images. I transfer all films done this way to video for the customer, who gets back their processed film and usually the DVD. The films that yield a somewhat closer to normal density negative image, can be transferred via most any telecine method. The films that are so extremely dense will require a more conventional telecine transfer with a bright projector lamp in order to be able to see the image and render it to video.

B&W Reversal Processing of KODACHROME films: This really can only be done successfully with films that are in good condition, not too old, or have been cold stored prior to use, regardless of age. Otherwise, there isn't enough silver for the reversal stage due to the severe age fogging in old films, and the images will either be very faint with little detail, or nothing at all.....just clear film. To reversal process good KODACHROME film, just use the normal B&W Reversal process. Prewash the film 1 to 2 minutes prior to development, and you will have to push the development in the First Developer by at least 2 minutes over normal time. The reason is that KODACHROME will lose its effective filmspeed if processed to the exact time you would process Plus-X or Tri-X for example. If you do not compensate the time, then the final images will be too dark otherwise. IF you are using the newer KODAK D-94a formulation to process the film and the new permagenate Bleach solution, then you will have to conduct a test to determine your time in the First Developer based on density after processing, and also will have to extend the Bleaching time by twice as much in order to bleach out all the negative silver.

REM-JET Coating Removal: In the motion picture process, this is soaked to soften in a remjet removal bath stage, then buffed with buffing rollers at the tank exit stage while being rinsed with water at the same time. In manual processing, you will have to remove the remjet after all processing is completed. It is troublesome, and slow to remove. After the film has been properly washed free of the Fixer, soak the film in a solution of Borax & Water (2 to 4 tablespoons per Liter), at a temperature of 75 F to 80 F, for at least 5 minutes, longer if necessary. After soaking, remove the film from the processing tank or spiral reel, depending on what method you are using. Transfer the film to a takeup reel, and then place into a tray of the Borax solution. If you can make up a special plastic tray by gluing a small stud in the center upon which the reel can rotate, all the better. Then setup a rewind arm; I use a portable 3ft setup with 2 small Craig 8mm/16mm rewinds on a 3ft 2" x 4" board which I can clamp to the lab sink or countertop via a large C-Clamp. Use a good photo-grade sponge and have a 2nd tray of Borax solution, as you will pull the film from the holding tray, thru the sponge which you will keep soaked and submersed in the 2nd Tray, and the film will then pass to the Takeup Reel on the Winder Arm. The remjet backing should come off, just be careful to wind slowly and watch the removal upon takeup. Be advised, this is a very messy process, and you will have to rinse the sponge out many many times, usually after every 5 to 10 feet of film. It depends on how much came off during the processing itself, usually, not too much. Generally, you will have to wipe the film completely at least twice to get all the remjet off. Then once removed, you will have to wash the film for at least another 2 minutes to remove all traces of the Borax solution. Then use a Wetting-Drying Agent such as KODAK Photo-Flo Solution, chamois if desired and hang up onto a Film Drying Rack to dry.

NOTE: IF the remjet is very hard to remove, even after soaking for a long time, even if you have increased the solution strength by double, then you will have to use more physical force by squeezing the sponge harder and pulling the film thru just a couple feet at a time and checking for removal, and if not all off, backing the film and going over those 2 feet of film again, until the backing is off. On some very old films, you will find that there often are still small traces of the remjet backing, and even film cleaner won't remove it easily. For Newer and/or Cold Stored films, the remjet will come off.

SEPIA Tone: If you prefer a nice rich Sepia Brown Tone to the reversal image, then substitute KODAK T-19 Developer for the ReDeveloper. This is a simple solution of Sodium Sulfite and Water....but NOTE.....use plenty of fresh air, since not only does this stink of rotten eggs, but can be dangerous! No reversal exposure is necessary when using this Developer. The formula is as follows:

KODAK SULFIDE ReDEVELOPER T-19
Kodak Sodium Sulfide (Anhydrous) 20.00 grams
[NOT Sulfite!]
Water to make......................1.0 Liter

I have been able to use Sodium Sulfide Flakes, but they must be ground up prior to mixing using a mortar and pistol and it can be quite time consuming. If you use this, make sure you use a breathing mask and do the grinding in full fresh air.

Exact times, temperature, method, all depends on what chemicals are available to you in processing your own films, and also what processing method you are using: Rewind Tank, Reel & Trough, Rack & Tray, Spiral Reel & Tank etc. No secrets, just normal B&W Reversal Chemistry, either the original long time formulas, or the current D-94a process.

LASTLY, if you desire a NEGATIVE image instead of Reversal, you can make use any any conventional full emulsion speed continous tone Developer (e.g. D-76, Microphen, HC-110 etc) and adjust your process as necessary based on density results. I recommend shooting your own Control Strip so that you can fine-tune the Negative Development to whatever Gamma or Contrast Gradient you desire. Since most would be transferring the Negative images to Video with electronic reversal......a remote possibility is to print the film and strike a positive from it; but that is costlier.

Hope this is useful to you.
Martin Baumgarten - November 2010

Read more: http://www.cinematography.com/index.php?showtopic=48841
 
Joined
Oct 25, 2007
Messages
122
Format
Medium Format
What about TMAX direct positive outfit?

Hi all,

I was reading this thread, and I had an idea. Would a TMAX direct positive outfit work with Kodachrome? I guess there would be a need for testing different E.I. Did anyone tried it?

That would be a nice opportunity since there will still be tons of the film available for very low prices from now.

Also, how is that remjet backing removed? I guess that the best bet would be to do it before the processing to avoid contaminating the chemistry.

Best,

K.
 

holmburgers

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
4,439
Location
Vienna, Austria
Format
Multi Format
Remjet is only a problem with movie film, so N/A.

UPDATE: GUESS NOT! (see below)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Tony-S

Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2009
Messages
1,144
Location
Colorado, USA
Format
Multi Format
OK, so what's a suggested process for B&W negs from Kodachrome? I have a few rolls of 35mm and one 120 that I'd like to put to use.
 

Nicholas Lindan

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Sep 2, 2006
Messages
4,243
Location
Cleveland, Ohio
Format
Multi Format
A few things I have found:

  • Adding a bit of dishwashing detergent to the borax remjet bath makes the process much, much less messy. The detergent prevents the remjet from redepositing from the wash water back on to the film, sponge, hands and everything else. I found putting the film in a bucket with the borax & detergent for 10 minutes and giving it a swirl removed the backing cleanly with no muss, fuss or wiping.

  • Processing really old film as from the 70's results in black film. One roll came out completely opaque - couldn't even see the filament of a halogen lamp through it. The other had some very faint image in the black murk.
 

bwfans

Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2004
Messages
176
Format
Multi Format
It seems Kodachrome processed by Rodinal standing developement is quite capable.

I am looking for the suggestions on best time to remove the Ram-Jet layer. First in the whole process or the last in the whole process. I am told Lab removes this layer at first.

How to prevent scratching film surface during the removing of remjet?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

snapshot2000

Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2009
Messages
25
Format
Multi Format
old Kodachrome processed as B&W

About a year ago, I was poking around through my film stock in the freezer and found an old roll of Kodachrome 25 (K-14) that I exposed in 1986. It wasn't even in a canister, just a plastic bag. I remember it had sat around a drawer for a long time, and then spent a lot of time in the fridge before being thrown in the freezer.

I tried it in Diafine for 4 /4 min with slight agitation every min. and was amazed at the beautiful negatives I got. The even yellow stain didn't seem to affect scanning (I added extra acetic acid to the fix to help reduce it, though I don't know if that helped).

I did have trouble removing every last bit of the Remjet backing, which I did by laying the flm flat in a large sink and gently wiping the back with a sponge under running water.

The scans from this 23+ year-old film had amazing tonality, maybe a little hard to see here on this particular subject. The grain was very sharp, which worked well with the architectural subject matter.

Dan Murano
 

Attachments

  • kchrome-bw-1.jpg
    kchrome-bw-1.jpg
    131.1 KB · Views: 816

bwfans

Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2004
Messages
176
Format
Multi Format
Thanks for sharing Dan. This a great image. Diafine has so much good properties and I wonder what it cannot do.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,880
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Here are two links to two threads where B&W processing of Kodachrome is discussed:

(there was a url link here which no longer exists)

and

(there was a url link here which no longer exists)
 

yulia_s_rey

Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2011
Messages
256
Location
Madrid, Spain
Format
Multi Format
our standard practice at work for checking sound sync on our 16mm camera at work is to run any old film we happen to have on hand in Dektol 1:10 "quick and dirty" process. On many occasions I have done this with Ektachrome. It comes out with a lot of awesome chunky grain and high contrast. I wonder how far of is Koda from Ekta?
 

Rick A

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 31, 2009
Messages
9,923
Location
Laurel Highlands
Format
8x10 Format
has anybody been doing this recently?

I need to do this soon

I've been shooting at box speed and developing in D-76 stock.

D-76 stock 15mins@20c

stop 30sec. indicator stop bath

water rinse 1 min.

Fix TF-4 three mins or normal fix in whichever brand you usually use.

Wash in mixture of 1Tbsp Borax plus 1 Tbsp TSP per one liter water scrubbing with soft sponge until all remjet is cleared. Film may be soaked in this solution for one hour followed with clear water rinse. Repeat as many times as needed to remove remjet. You can prerinse with this solution until water runs clear then develope. You will still need to finish cleaning after fixing. Final rinse in photoflo or drying aid of choice.
 

BradleyK

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
946
Location
Burnaby, BC
Format
Multi Format
In the ongoing process (about 2 weeks thus far) of unpacking after a recent move, I came across four rolls of unshot KR64, vintage early 1990s(?). I realize that it can be processed, with some difficulty, as a black and white negative. So... what are my options? I have no idea as to the film's storage conditions - I found it mixed in with my office supplies. Any recommendations re ISO? I really would like to shoot and process the film for high contrast images - architectural abstracts, possibly. Is this possible? The effect I would like to try for is sort of one of minimum tones: little middle tones, just pure black and white. Any suggestions?
 

John Shriver

Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2006
Messages
482
Format
35mm RF
For very high contrast negatives, I'd recommend Kodak Technical Pan or it's predecessor Kodak High Contrast Copy in D-19. Both are essentially grainless. But neither is easy to find now. You won't get that sort of contrast out of Kodakchrome, especially since you won't be removing the "Cary Lea silver" yellow filter layer in normal B&W processing.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom