well the Canadian distributor has THIS page; https://www.ilfordphoto.ca/product/kentmere-120-roll-pan-400/
and gives their SKU as KM6014826 and I would guess that if you drop the KM, that is Ilfords Cat Number.
they aos show a UPC of UPC: 019498014819
perhaps those will help. they show Estimate Delivery Time is Dec 7, 2022
I’ll say RB67 before Sirius Glass says Hasselblad.
Kentmere is made specially, as a price leader film. when it came out Simon Gally metioned that it was made to fill a market. I am not 100% clear as whether it repleced the Ilford Pan 100 and Pan 400 in their line. those where only sold in places where the price was important. The completion they are aiming for is undoubtedly Arista.edu Ultra.Incidentally I found out where Kentmere comes or more accurately where a commentator has vaguely remembered reading somewhere about its origins It is offcuts from Ilford film batches that became offcuts because on checking its own Ilford films for the correct tolerances they were of a lower tolerance and so get converted to Kentmere
Kentmere is made specially, as a price leader film. when it came out Simon Gally metioned that it was made to fill a market. I am not 100% clear as whether it repleced the Ilford Pan 100 and Pan 400 in their line. those where only sold in places where the price was important. The completion they are aiming for is undoubtedly Arista.edu Ultra.
How usable.. This is a sample.these cameras you speak of at reasonable prices.. how usable are they? Its one to say a good condition ready to use 645 at a reasonable price versus a damaged one that needs critical repair being sold at a reasonable price.
my mamiya 645 will only last so long, that electronic shutter without a battery can only do 1/60th of a second. Using 400 iso film thats not a critical problem.
Yes that sounds right but I fear you may have missed that my British sense of humour was at work here. It was the "offcuts" explanation that I felt was of possible interest and amusement.
pentaxuser
Kentmere from 30 years ago is an entirely different product.
Harman bought Kentmere, then were forced to close down down the Kentmere factory due to environmental concerns and equipment that was too worn to modernize. They then moved production of almost all the remaining Kentmere product line to the same machinery used to make Ilford branded products.
The Kentmere branded product is designed by Harman to be saleable at a budget conscious price point - particularly for the educational market.
Does Alex Jones have a photography site?
why do i have a feeling Ilford is doing what Eley does,, if a lot doesnt completely meet a specific standard it becomes a new line of Kentmere film or paper?
The presenter of videos called ShootLikeABoss has already received his free rolls from Ilford and has used both the 100 and 400
We had a number of posts about its "lack" of or lesser of its anti-halation compared to the like of the other 100 and 400 Ilford film and for those who are curious about how this might translate into actual prints his video shows what may be a fair representation of this effect. One is a portrait of his daughter and the others the white hull of a boat in full sunshine
Anyway for what it is worth here's the video
Incidentally I found out where Kentmere comes or more accurately where a commentator has vaguely remembered reading somewhere about its origins It is offcuts from Ilford film batches that became offcuts because on checking its own Ilford films for the correct tolerances they were of a lower tolerance and so get converted to Kentmere
Time I checked again whether UV rays or bleach is still an effective remedy for COVID 19
pentaxuser
That's not how it works and it's quite well-documented by statements from Harman and/or Ilford as well as the observable technical differences between products.
Also, when something goes wrong in film or paper manufacturing, the result in virtually all cases isn't some kind of lower-grade product with subtly inferior qualities to the intended product, but very apparent defects and major problems that render the product entirely unmarketable. Once in a blue moon, some of these batches make it out into the world; e.g. there was a small batch of Ilford film with a longitudinal coating defect that slipped through QA - there's no chance Harman would have gotten away with selling it as Kentmere, as it was simply very clearly a defective product. Just as an illustration that "oh, this batch didn't come out entirely right, just stick a different label onto it" is a practice that only seems sensible if you ignore the realities of film and paper production.
{mod edit}
Lol,,, to bad the current production of Kodak chemicals felt that way
Chemicals generally don't feel much of anything. Other than that, your remark is unspecific and unsubstantiated, and therefore moot.
Perhaps the word 'production' was meant to be 'producers'. See post 91 above.
The presenter of videos called ShootLikeABoss has already received his free rolls from Ilford and has used both the 100 and 400
We had a number of posts about its "lack" of or lesser of its anti-halation compared to the like of the other 100 and 400 Ilford film and for those who are curious about how this might translate into actual prints his video shows what may be a fair representation of this effect. One is a portrait of his daughter and the others the white hull of a boat in full sunshine
Anyway for what it is worth here's the video
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |