All that's really missing is some better consumer scanners capable of capturing all of that shadow detail without blowing out the highlights.
I don;t like Velvia 100. When is Velvia 50 in 120 being discontinued? Where did you get that info? I see B and H is still selling it.What I felt about Velvia50 is : that is one of the best E6 ever. In 120 it is still avaible but the future seams to be a discontinuation in direction of remaining Velvia100 and Provia100F.(in120)
In 4x5 Velvia50 is out of sale.....
with regards
When is Velvia 50 in 120 being discontinued? Where did you get that info? I see B and H is still selling it.
Yeah, but it usually requires special settings that not all software has. I was just stating that for people new to scanning film, it presents an extra step that might keep them away from trying slide film in the first place. Of course, the same could be said for negative film. And really, it’s not so much the actual difficulty as it is the reputation of difficulty found on many sites online.It can be done with the scanners we have, but that is a thread for Hybrid discussion...
they will likely consider introducing a 120 and perhaps 4x5 version of it.
We'll see. There's always the possibility that Ektachrome re-energizes the slide film market and you see a sudden explosion of slide film shooters.
All that's really missing is some better consumer scanners capable of capturing all of that shadow detail without blowing out the highlights.
The advantage of Velvia50 is to most photographers in its intensive color look.2005 if I remember right Fuji stated it will be discontinued from reasons of inability to get the raw chemical substances for this emulsion.Perhaps you remember :A real mass of international photographers protested against Fujis decision of discontinuation. So the reason of less demand was nonsence in regard of Velvia50.I don;t like Velvia 100. When is Velvia 50 in 120 being discontinued? Where did you get that info? I see B and H is still selling it.
Yeah Kino that is aThe Curves tool in any reasonable scanner software is all you need to get full range scans, but this has been beaten to death in other threads and goes nowhere with much animosity generated.
Now, back to the original premise: Personally, I would like to see 120 (on the way), 4x5 (problematic) and 8x10 (not likely) in Ektachrome.
That is not totally wrong you metionedI would not call Velvia too contrasy. The vibrance and saturation and contrast all contribute to make an image 'pop' in a way that color negative or digital cannot. A print or monitor can't do justice. It can be mimicked digitally but nothing brings me back to the moment like a well made velvia slide on the light table. As for 4x5 and 8x10, the cost is prohibitively expensive. Why should larger than 6x6 if you cannot project?
This has already been announced as a fact by Kodak but it requires additional production steps which they have to plan out, so it is not going to happen immediately, but it is a future-plan event.
But as we are seeing at the moment, maybe not.
There have been no takers here of the Ektachrome 100 in 135-36 format, and that is chiefly due to the very steep price. However, this pricing is not entirely due to Kodak, but the 17% retail premium that is common here. The significantly lower pricing in the USA and North America of Ektachrome 100 is due to retail introductory 'baiting' -- the price will most definitely go up in the near future. As time progresses independent online dealers will once again provide price relief; street-level stores do not necessarily embrace discounting of premium products; this can lead to a persistent cycle of discount fatigue which eats into profits. All this however does not necessarily mean that there will be an "explosion of slide film shooters". This is a specialist, niche area that is not growing but contracting. All well and good that another E6 product is on the market, but it has not, in reality, got off to a promising start.
"Consumer scanners" are quite capable of recording all detail from shadows to midtones to highlights on the proviso that the photographer has correctly exposed the film in the conditions for which the film is know to respond best to. Unpalatable as it may be, all of the existing E6 films do not and never have performed well being shot in bright, contrasty light. There will be a casualty: shadows will block, highlights will fail and midtones will be lost. I have explained this often enough to people often reduced to tears by the poor results obtained from Fuji films simply because they thought it would be the same as a roll of negative film. It is not. Factually, if highlights are blowing, examine the light you are shooting in: Neither Velvia 50 or 100, and to a lesser extent Provia 100F, will tolerate long exposures in bright light, even bright-hazy light. Soft light -- even flat to overcast, provides for the graceful retention of shadow and highlight detail, and will give most competent scanners a very good chance of successfully recording the full range of soft contrasts.
While over here in New Zealand I will be running through the last Beta-test roll of Ektachrome 100 from a colleague who has returned to work as a result of personal circumstances and has handed over the remaining task to me.
The first barrierefrei is overcome 120 Ektachrome will come back !
Source?Next on plan for discontinuation by Fuji (in 35mm and 120 format) sorry to tell :
View attachment 222271
with condolences from "Trendland" !
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?