ID-11 alternative?

[Anon Ymous]

That's an awesome resource, thank you! I'll be able to get to it when you provide the recipe to combat laziness No, seriously, it does make it seem doable to my non-chemist brain.

If you can make a cake, you can also scratch-mix a developer. Actually, it's even simpler and more fool proof. No need to be a chemist.

 

[Don_ih]

If you can make a cake, you can also scratch-mix a developer. Actually, it's even simpler and more fool proof.

Exactly. Number one: you don't need to bake a developer. Clean up is easier, too.

 

[MattKing]

If you can make a cake, you can also scratch-mix a developer. Actually, it's even simpler and more fool proof. No need to be a chemist.

Exactly. Number one: you don't need to bake a developer. Clean up is easier, too.

Just don't lick the mixing beaters or the bowl!

 

[Daniela]

Just don't lick the mixing beaters or the bowl!

Duly noted!

 

[Lachlan Young]

Another strange thing is some people seem to believe ID-11 wouldn’t have all the same “instability” issues as D-76.

It's up there with those who extensively denigrate D-76/ID-11 and then expend paragraphs of fluff about how Pyrocat slices their bread for them - without ever stopping to notice that Pyrocat is a very simple D-76/ Autophen derivative (hence why it actually develops films more-or-less OK) with an isomer substitution.

 

[john_s]

It's up there with those who extensively denigrate D-76/ID-11 and then expend paragraphs of fluff about how Pyrocat slices their bread for them - without ever stopping to notice that Pyrocat is a very simple D-76/ Autophen derivative (hence why it actually develops films more-or-less OK) with an isomer substitution.

If you look at it like that, I suppose just about every developer is such a derivative. Simple can be good.

 

[RalphLambrecht]

This is interesting to know. I always assumed I'd need special equipment...

So it's not just here...thanks for sharing!


I just also bought some Adox D76 for now. Let's keep each other informed of any developments!

@Brian: thre is no need for special equipment for mixing your processing chemicals from bulk; just a set of kitchen spoons or kitchen scales (both easy to obtain and inexpensive to purchase)

 

[Lachlan Young]

If you look at it like that, I suppose just about every developer is such a derivative. Simple can be good.

No. The ratio of M:Q or P:Q defines a very great deal of the developer's characteristics. D-76 is 2:5 M:Q, Autophen subs P for M at 1:10 (which, while it might have been the right choice in this instance, every unthinking substitution since has used it - which immediately confirms they haven't checked the work of Levenson and others on the viable P:Q ratio ranges) and then Pyrocat swaps HQ for Catechol at 1:1. Fortuitously for Pyrocat, 1:25 happens to be a pretty good P:Q ratio, but it's been very well known to the industry (and thoroughly commercially exploited) for decades.

The buffering changes don't really count as Kodak (and everyone else) published innumerable possible variants, none of which pretended to be anything other than D-76 variants.

 

[Ian Grant]

D76 was not the first Borax-MQ fine grain developer. The 11th Edition of The Wellington Photographic Handbook lists the following developer:

Wllington Borax-MQ Developer

Metol 2g
Hydroquinone 5g
Sodium Sulphite (anhyd) 10g
Borax 20g
Water to 1 litre

Later editions add that it is a fine grain developer. The PDF of i 11th Ed Handbook claims it's 1910, but the preface talks about the duration of the war, and 75% of their original staff absent for military service, so obviously WWI. So the 11th ed is likely to be late 1918 or early 1919.

So the same M-Q ratio as D76, this was changed to 1:1 in the 1922 12th Edition.

Ian

 

[Milpool]

You're probably correct regarding the Phenidone : Catechol ratio in Pyrocat not being particularly novel (and being fortuitous), but I think its popularity is simply a matter of it being a staining developer with "pyro" in the name, with the benefit of catechol being more stable than pyrogallol. It probably gives very slightly better emulsion speed than its metol-pyrogallol predecessors but that's minor.

It's up there with those who extensively denigrate D-76/ID-11 and then expend paragraphs of fluff about how Pyrocat slices their bread for them - without ever stopping to notice that Pyrocat is a very simple D-76/ Autophen derivative (hence why it actually develops films more-or-less OK) with an isomer substitution.

 

[RalphLambrecht]

If the OP is open to liquid concentrates, such as DD_X, why not Clayton’s F76+, which is more economical than DD-X, has a decent shelf-life (once opened, expect at least three months), is used at 1 + 9 dilution, and is available from FreeStyle in 32oz or smaller (12 oz?) bottles (as Arista Premium or some such thing)?

It's a relief to realize that B&W processing chemicals are the last thing we will run out of. Paper and film will be gone much before the chemicals. We can easily mix processing chemicals from bulk. Making paper and film ourselves will be another cattle of fish

 

[pentaxuser]

If the OP is open to liquid concentrates, such as DD_X, why not Clayton’s F76+, which is more economical than DD-X, has a decent shelf-life (once opened, expect at least three months), is used at 1 + 9 dilution, and is available from FreeStyle in 32oz or smaller (12 oz?) bottles (as Arista Premium or some such thing)?

The problem here might be that Clayton F76 is unknown in the U.K and as far as I know is not available in France either. The problem with sources of developers, etc is that not all are available everywhere

pentaxuser

 

[Tom Kershaw]

The problem here might be that Clayton F76 is unknown in the U.K and as far as I know is not available in France either. The problem with sources of developers, etc is that not all are available everywhere

I guess Fotospeed FD10 is still available? This used to be mentioned frequently but haven't seen mention of it more recently. Adox D-76 is available in the UK anyway.

Adox D-76 Film Developer, makes 5 litres

Alternative to the classic Kodak developer, will process 50+ films

www.firstcall-photographic.co.uk

 

[john_s]

............ Fortuitously for Pyrocat, 1:25 happens to be a pretty good P:Q ratio, but it's been very well known to the industry (and thoroughly commercially exploited) for decades.
.....................................

It is on the record that Sandy King tried a wide range of amounts of phenidone in arriving at his formula for Pyrocat-HD, so I think the use of the word "fortuitously" isn't appropriate.

I'd have to admit that I've used a few developers in my half century of photography but I've been blissfully unaware of whether or not they were "derivative." I think that only one wasn't (Rodinal), and they've all had shortcomings compared to my current derivatives, Pyrocat and ID-68.

 

[brian steinberger]

ID-11 back in stock at B&H.

 

[Keith Tapscott.]

ID-11 back in stock at B&H.

That's good news. There's no mention yet that I know of whether it is available again in the UK.

 

[Agulliver]

That's good news. There's no mention yet that I know of whether it is available again in the UK.

ID-11 is currently in stock at Ilford Photo's UK web shop.

 

[Daniela]

Just checked 4 places here (3 with stores in Paris) and it still doesn't seem to be available...

 

[Keith Tapscott.]

ID-11 is currently in stock at Ilford Photo's UK web shop.

When I tried to add it to the shopping basket it wouldn't show. Perhaps I did something wrong.

 

[Angarian]

Just checked 4 places here (3 with stores in Paris) and it still doesn't seem to be available...

My suggestion from my own experience:
ID-11 and D76 offer the same performance.
When Kodak developed XTOL, it was designed as a bit "better D76": Delivering the qualities of D76, but with an even little bit finer grain, and more environmentally friendly by using Isoascorbate.

And now we have Adox XT-3 as an even further improved XTOL version.
Therefore in my experience Adox XT-3 is a perfect replacement or alternative for ID-11 / D-76.

 

[DeletedAcct1]

A good alternative, at a fraction of the cost of the other manufacturers, is Fomadon P.
1 liter packet is 4,25€ currently...

FOMADON P 1 litr | powder |FOMA BOHEMIA e-shop

negative menthol-hydroquinone developer powder Product Label

fomaobchod.cz

 

[JPD]

A good alternative, at a fraction of the cost of the other manufacturers, is Fomadon P.
1 liter packet is 4,25€ currently...

FOMADON P 1 litr | powder |FOMA BOHEMIA e-shop

negative menthol-hydroquinone developer powder Product Label

fomaobchod.cz

I hope "menthol" is an autocorrect mistake.

 

[John Wiegerink]

I was a very happy Xtol user and never experienced the "sudden death" syndrome. When I couldn't get Xtol for my new batch of replenished Xtol I tried Adox XT-3. I like it a lot and it's super-easy to mix plus it comes in two sizes. Nope, I like it so much I won't be going back to Xtol. Might not be the cheapest Xtol clone, but when running it replenished the cost difference means practically nothing.

 

[Daniela]

My suggestion from my own experience:
ID-11 and D76 offer the same performance.
When Kodak developed XTOL, it was designed as a bit "better D76": Delivering the qualities of D76, but with an even little bit finer grain, and more environmentally friendly by using Isoascorbate.

And now we have Adox XT-3 as an even further improved XTOL version.
Therefore in my experience Adox XT-3 is a perfect replacement or alternative for ID-11 / D-76.

Thanks for the recommendation. I'm quite happy with D76 (n fact, I just mixed 5L of it), but I'll keep the others you mention in mind for the future.

So, a recap of the alternatives suggested:
DD-X
HC 110
D23
XTOL
Adox XT-3
F76
Arista A76
Legacy Pro L76
Foma Retro Special
FOMADON P

 

[cliveh]

Thanks for the recommendation. I'm quite happy with D76 (n fact, I just mixed 5L of it), but I'll keep the others you mention in mind for the future.

So, a recap of the alternatives suggested:
DD-X
HC 110
D23
XTOL
Adox XT-3
F76
Arista A76
Legacy Pro L76
Foma Retro Special
FOMADON P

You wont regret using D76, it is a superb reliable developer and very consistant.