We can export to the UK to individuals and we do such on a daily basis just that the order has to EXCEED 135 UKP because we are obliged to charge and deliver british VAT on orders BELOW 135 UKP. That´s the absurdity of this. We would have to declare VAT in the UK through an apointed tax consultant for small orders and just a few pounds so that administrative costs will outrun any possible benefit. How the british government came up with the idea to impose this burdon on businesses (aparantly expecting them to actually do this) is a mistery to me. So we are selling to our UK dealers like we always did and any private person can order from us with ease just that the order has to be about 170 EUR or more.Thanks for the reply I have not heard if the 135 UKP rule but are you saying that until is resolved it is not worth your effort to export directly to an individual customer in the U.K.? If this is the case then will you export to our larger retailers, some of whom currently stock Adox products or is this not worthwhile either?
Thanks
pentaxuser
Any private person can order from us with ease just that the order has to be about 170 EUR or more.
How the british government came up with the idea to impose this burdon on businesses (aparantly expecting them to actually do this) is a mistery to me. So we are selling to our UK dealers like we always did and any private person can order from us with ease just that the order has to be about 170 EUR or more.
Please english come back! We all love you!It sounds to me that now is the time that the UK should rejoin the EU.
Ironically it was cheaper for me to buy Ilford film from Fotoimpex (Germany) than from UK online shops. It could be that better deals might have been possible shopping around more but I have never found better ones myself.Well it is not a small consolation that you have Ilford in the UK...
Curious to see how they ended up printing!
We need a volunteer to start testing self-replenishing!
@m00dawg I applaud your strive for precision, but less scientific approach can still give us a quick answer. The way I've done this in the past with Xtol was to shoot & develop my films normally, re-using 100% of developer (pouring it back into a 2L "working" bottle) and adjusting development times using the "Time Compensation" table from the Xtol datasheet. After about 10 rolls, I would start replenishing at 100ml per roll and slightly tweaking development time until it gets stable. I found this method to be easy/lazy and absolutely risk-free, as my negatives were always reasonably close to perfect during this seasoning process.
Over-replenishment does have a downside, in that it makes it difficult to attain a steady state of activity.
A replenished workflow depends on removing the right amount of development byproducts - otherwise the activity of the developer will either decrease or increase steadily.
If you add 100 ml of replenisher when 70 is the right amount, you are also removing 100 ml of byproduct laden used developer.
But it is.@MattKing sorry but what you saying can not be true.
This just means that with your setup, and your film usage, the proper replenishment rate is 100 ml per roll.And if you don't believe math, I have evidence - the 2L bottle which is perfectly stable after 30+ rolls while replenishing at 100ml. I can post a photo of it!
I’m also replenishing 100ml per film and it the results are fine after about 40 films.Matt, sorry but this is your conclusion/assumption. It does not actually happen. The activity of a developer cannot be increasing indefinitely - I wrote this in the previous comment and it did not land? The Kodak quote below:
This is all true, because this comment suggests keeping constant development time (also listed in a datasheet) and adjusting replenishment volume according to film speed + development frequency at lowest possible cost. You are making incorrect conclusion from this section of a data sheet. Every amount of replenisher greater than 70ml will achieve a stable state. You can replenish even with 300ml - and it will work. Your development time will be shorter, (and it will be kind of pointless) but it will be stable.
And if you don't believe in math, I have dumb evidence - the 2L bottle which is perfectly stable after 30+ rolls while replenishing at 100ml. I can post a photo of it!
If you take out too much of those byproducts, and add too much fresh developer, you will end up with working solution that is more active than it was before you developed that film. And that means you don't have needed consistency - results will change constantly.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?