After two rolls of p30 that came out tragically in d76 (shoot @80iso, they came out underexposed and underdeveloped), I was hoping for the magic properties of Paranol. S. Now, I don't believe in magic, and the negative resulting was one of the worst I've ever had in the last years. I shoot @80, developed in 1+50 for 14 minutes at 20.0 degrees. The negative came out as document microfilm: there is transparent base in the shadows and DMAX in the highlights. Nothing in between. I looks like a 8iso film shoot ad 3200 and developed for two hours, massively underexposed and brutally overdeveloped. I used my Nikon F90, and I trust the meter, as the day before I did HP5 and color and the negs were all exposed correctly.
As a side note, I also developed a roll of Acros (shoot in sequence) and, while it appears exposed correctly, it seems quite underdeveloped (I did per instructions, 1+50 14 minutes at 20C). So I'm not sure how much fault is in the film and how much in the developer.
Returning to P30, I really can't understand how some people get good results at 80iso, unless they overexpose by 2 stops. The 4 rolls I shoot at this speed all had no shadow detail and a mixture of thin/blocked highlights depending on the developer I tried. I will revert back to 16iso in beutler, which gave me the best results, for the remaining films.
EDIT: I'm forgetting how to write in English...

EDIT2: it is a
F90 obviously...