cooltouch
Member
No. It's about on par with the .30/40 Krag.
And I don't know where all this "hot" military ammunition is, I have a No.4 MK1* and I've never used anything but surplus, several thousand rounds worth, from Dominion in Canada loaded in 1909, with the 215grn. bullet, to lend-lease 174grn. loaded by Winchester in 1941, to stuff loaded in Iraq, I think, in 1959. No bruised shoulder, metal buttplate notwithstanding, although the 215 grn loads are a bit stiffer in recoil.
I agree, the .30/40 Krag is a more apt comparison, albeit a less common one than the .30-30.
Are you still able to find surplus .303? I can't find it anymore.
I honestly don't know where the surplus military .303 I had came from. I kept the brass, but it's in storage somewhere -- dunno exactly where at the moment, or else I could pull out a couple of cases and let you know. All I know is the recoil was as stiff as my 7mm Rem Mag, but the latter had a butt pad, so it didn't hurt. Perhaps some of it was one particular Enfield I own. It started life as a Lithgow No. 1 Mk III, but an outfit in SoCal call Federal Ordnance must have gotten hold of some surplus No. 5 Mk I flash suppressors, so they converted some No. 1 Mk IIIs to "Jungle Rifles". I bought one in 1992, mostly because it was cheap and it reminded me of a No. 5 Mk I I'd owned way back when I was a teen and young adult. Maybe it was the shortened barrel of that conversion, but that was my first experience with a bruised shoulder firing an Enfield. I have another No. 1 Mk III and a No. 4 Mk II, both of which I've shot some but I was putting my own reloads through them, so they don't count.
I shot up all that ammo back then, but I still have a couple of bandoliers that I've kept for sentimental reasons. The markings on those rounds are RG 50 7. Whatever that means. These bandoliers I bought a couple years after shooting up the earlier military .303 I had.