kate swart
Member
Hi, I received a King bulk film loader today but cannot find any information on it. Is it any good ?
I have an old Lloyds which doesn't have all the fancy counters but still loads film fine provided you can count to 31. I load cassettes until I run out of film and then put another spool of film in and continue along my way. And no, I don't have scratches on my film from the felt light trap because I don't store it in a used vacuum cleaner bag. Of course, you can store the newer ones with the counters and stuff in a used vacuum cleaner bag if you want to because they are better designed. Just don't store your film cassettes in there too.
One advantage of the Lloyds felt trap type is that you lose less film. The Watson type, if loading in the light, will fog what the camera thinks is the last frame. .
The King loader has two meters, both for the number of fra,es loaded, and the resting film. Thus being better equipped.
At the King this is instead seemingly done by counting frames.
(they were all made by AP in Spain)
two dials make me think of the https://www.freestylephoto.biz/27326-Arista-35mm-Bulk-Film-Loader-Bobinquick-Junior bobinquick.
...
(they were all made by AP in Spain) Note that the video metions what steps MUST be done in teh dark, and also I belive that he cuts the film leder exactly on te wrong side, but compair with a factory loaded film to get that step right.
This is the one I got. Seems nice. I did put a roll of film through it and it scratched the film, maybe im just loading it wrong since the instructions is in Japanese.I don't know of any genuinely bad bulk loaders -- there are basically two types, the Watson style and the Lloyd style.
Do you have a picture of the one you got?
How do you determine that? To me it looks more advanced - like the Kaiser type with exposure- and remaining stock counters. I don't see any felt trap inside: https://aucview.aucfan.com/yahoo/w1036489361/Okay, that's essentially a Lloyd type. If it's scratching, the felt lining the (double curved) film passage from the bulk roll chamber probably has grit in it (or your cassette velvets do). The sticky edge of a Post-It does a pretty good job on cassette velvet; I haven't yet had occasion to clean the felt in a Lloyd style loader.
The only felt type thingy I see is on the drum or cover but it looks clean to me. It seems like a nice loader with both frame and stock counter.How do you determine that? To me it looks more advanced - like the Kaiser type with exposure- and remaining stock counters. I don't see any felt trap inside: https://aucview.aucfan.com/yahoo/w1036489361/
The person who gave it to me told me he used it once but it scratched the film thats why hes not using it anymore. Im sure there must be a way to fix the scratching. From what I see some people are having no problems with scratching or bulk loaders and others dont recommend it so not sure what to think of it. I would love to sucessfully load my own film rolls.Okay, that's essentially a Lloyd type. If it's scratching, the felt lining the (double curved) film passage from the bulk roll chamber probably has grit in it (or your cassette velvets do). The sticky edge of a Post-It does a pretty good job on cassette velvet; I haven't yet had occasion to clean the felt in a Lloyd style loader.
BTW, there's a table around (or you can copy off eBay listings) for Lloyd loaders telling how many crank turns are needed for a given number of frames.
I would love to sucessfully load my own film rolls.
How do you determine that? To me it looks more advanced - like the Kaiser type with exposure- and remaining stock counters. I don't see any felt trap inside: https://aucview.aucfan.com/yahoo/w1036489361/
Then forget about this and any loader, and load without such.
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |