• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Adox HR-50 developed in Caffenol LC+C looks like London fog?

John Wiegerink

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
4,302
Location
Lake Station, MI
Format
Multi Format
I have never tried any of the Caffenol developers until tonight. I decided to try Caffenol LC+C on a partial roll of HR-50. While the images look very good and very sharp the negatives have a lot of base fog. I'm pretty sure I can print through this, but was just wondering if this was normal or not. Also, I didn't have Folger's crystals and just used my stores cheap house brand instant coffee. I don't think that would cause the fog, but you never know. Or at least I never know since this is my first try. Do other folks here get pretty heavy base fog with Caffenol?
 
Yeah. It's a bit like toning cyanotypes etc. in coffee - the coffee stains the base. It's the same as your dentist complaining about "sir you must be drinking a lot of coffee, I'll ask my assistant to make an appointment with you to clean the staining a little" LOL.

Caffenol is effectively a staining developer in the 'bad' sense of the word: it adds an overall stain, but not an image-wise stain. So it's kind of the opposite of e.g. Pyrocat.
 

Koraks,
I figured it would discolor the negatives some, but didn't think the stain would be this heavy. I'm on my way to the cottage and the negatives are left down home or I'd show them. When I get back down home I'm going to try this again, but I might try a touch of KBr in the next batch to see if it makes a difference.
 
I don't expect bromide to do anything about this since the staining is likely just the coffee painting the gelatin, not so much silver fogging. Although the latter can also play a part of course. In that case KBr will help tone it down a little.

Btw, I have to admit I'm kind of the wrong audience for this; I never quite understood the attraction of these coffee developers. The way I see it they're fairly inefficient and the whole eco-story to surround them sounds fishy to me in the light of the quantity of instant coffee that's needed and the overall impact that has over its product life cycle. From a technical viewpoint it's very obvious that there are plenty of superior alternatives, many of which are very cost-effective and sometimes even relatively ecologically benign (instant Mytol etc.)
 

I probably know less than you do when it comes to Caffenol developers. I would not have even tried a coffee style developer for HR-50, but all my chemical for developer making are at the cottage and I was down home. My grocery store had what I needed so I had to try it. I only tried this because I had just repaired a Minolta 7s rangefinder and wanted to see if it was working properly. I figured the addition of KBr would at least let me know if it was all stain or not. The funny thing about all of this is that while looking through my cabinet to see if I had any KBr down home I stumbled on a half bottle of Adox Rodinal that I forgot to bring North to the cottage. I could have used that with the HR-50 since I know the two go together very well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register