Do you know how works a preset lens like the Helios44-2?
The images look extremely underexposed to me. Perhaps the aperture is not operating correctly or mis-calibrated in some way. Also, look through the lens off the camera to see if there is any haze or fungus.
Do you know how works a preset lens like the Helios44-2?
Important question!What do you mean?
Ok , thanks for your comment. well let's see. First I would focus on the Zeiss if possible, not on the Helios.. I know their are supposed to be the same but maybe not totally..?Important question!
You should meter stopped-down, otherwise your photos will definitely end up underexposed.
So focus wide open, manually stop down the lens and meter the scene, then take the photo.
What do your negatives look like when you compare the Canon's negative with the Helios negative?
When underexposed they look quite "thin", e.g. you can see through them very easily.
IMO histograms only tell half the story, as this is the scanner's interpretation of the negative.
You can use Lightroom or Photoshop to "stretch" the histogram to look like a well exposed image, but the actual photo might still look terrible.
When in good condition and used correctly, the Helios is a very good perfomer with plenty contrast:
What do you mean?
I guess your talking about the second ring that fixes the minimum aperture. I don't see why or how that could be an answer to my problem. If you use that feature wrong, I reckon the only thing that could happen is that your photos get overexposed because for instance your preset ring is fixed to f8 while you wanted to shoot at 16f. But still, you would notice that your aperture ring doesn't turn further than a fixed value...
I never really found usefull this feature, so my preset ring is fixed to f22 so that I am free to space from max to min aperture.
At first when I read your comment, I must admit, I thought for a minute that maybe all my photos where underexposed because all shot somehow all at f22! As if the lens switched back to the preset aperture when shooting. But it is not that way, right? I even checked right now the blades, taking some film-free shot, and they don't close to f22 when shooting, so my doubt is gone....
but please tell me more of what you think
Yes, as this will underexpose your images.Guys, I don't understand.
Is it wrong to meter wide open and then step down to the suggested aperture (given a a certain shutter speed)?
Yes, as this will underexpose your images.
Say you meter at f/2 and the result is e.g. 1/250sec shutter speed, that equivalents to EV = 10 (@ ISO 100).
Now you stop down to f/8 and take your photo at 1/250sec shutter speed, that equivalents to EV = 14 (@ ISO 100).
Meaning your photo will be 4 stops underexposed if you meter at f/2 and then shoot at f/8.
You should always meter at the aperture you're going to use to take the photo.
Modern cameras and lenses will do this automatically for you (the lens tells the camera which aperture you've chosen, camera will usually meter wide open and then compensate exposure automatically for you), but with the Helios this must be done manually.
But also with automatic lenses adapted to modern cameras this can sometimes be an issue.
For example when using my Zuiko lenses on my Olympus OM cameras they will automatically meter correctly, but when the same Zuiko lenses are adapted to my Canon (d)SLR, I must manually stop down before metering.
Ah ok, your confusion makes more sense to me now. You shoot in shutter priority mode, where you set your shutter speed and then get an aperture suggested after metering.Thank for you answer but I don't understand your explanation.
Let's say I select 1/125 shutter speed, and then, wide open at f2, I meter. The meter then points me 8.0. Doesn't it mean that f8 is then the right aperture to have a good exposure?
On the contrary, if I want to shot at 8.0: after focusing, I close she shutter to f8, I meter, and I adjust the shutter speed till the exposimeter points f8.
What is wrong with it?
Plus. Like the situation isn't already complicated enough, my photo seller I bought the Biotar from, now says that with my camera Canon AE1 it's impossible to trust the meter of the camera (for reason I didn't get to understand) so I can only shoot with an external meter.
I am going crazy.
What do you mean?
I guess your talking about the second ring that fixes the minimum aperture. I don't see why or how that could be an answer to my problem. If you use that feature wrong, I reckon the only thing that could happen is that your photos get overexposed because for instance your preset ring is fixed to f8 while you wanted to shoot at 16f. But still, you would notice that your aperture ring doesn't turn further than a fixed value...
I never really found usefull this feature, so my preset ring is fixed to f22 so that I am free to space from max to min aperture.
At first when I read your comment, I must admit, I thought for a minute that maybe all my photos where underexposed because all shot somehow all at f22! As if the lens switched back to the preset aperture when shooting. But it is not that way, right? I even checked right now the blades, taking some film-free shot, and they don't close to f22 when shooting, so my doubt is gone....
but please tell me more of what you think
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?