thomas
you should know by not on page 7 of the thread
that if you don't "agree" you are wrong.
Both Lartigue and Atget were journalists.
No one wants to silence anyone. Quite on the contrary, it'd be nice if a discussion had balanced participation from lots of different people.
No one wants to silence anyone. Quite on the contrary, it'd be nice if a discussion had balanced participation from lots of different people.
Enjoying a discussion without becoming argumentative is an unspoken piece of 'threadiquette' that sometimes gets neglected and inevitably leads to harsh words. If they feel like they're getting talked over, some members check out or click the 'ignore' button. That's unfortunate, when so many excellent opinions may be read here.
Another point is that if I landed in this thread, I'd be especially interested in the thoughts of those people who are known contributors of exceptional photographs in the galleries and portfolios.
What is art as opposed to fine art?
One of my friends owns a gallery. I asked her what the difference was between art and fine art. She said about 40% extra on selling price!
Steve.
>>>"My wife asks me when I am going to create beautifull images in stead of technical perfect images...<<<
That makes me smile. You've gotta love those people who know you closely enough to say that! Don't you?
Fine art is art that is for no other purpose than display, as opposed to applied art. The term has nothing to do with whether something is good art or bad art.
Here's a thread from the last time someone asked the same question: 6 pages
(there was a url link here which no longer exists)
here's another: 5 pages
(there was a url link here which no longer exists)
... Always ends the same way: to each his own. [...] "Fine art" is a fundamentally useless term now...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?