Thy know not of which thy speak.That can easily lead you to the notion of the "sublime", which was the ultimate art-experience coming out of medieval philosophy (almost always having to do with religious "uplifting"). The "sublime" is a concept that really pushes a rarefied notion of art (artistic/religious epiphany) and should be left in mouldering old books where it belongs.
"Fine" art is a valueless description. It is not really as a purposive object that art is ever appreciated as specifically art, so the limiting notion of a "fine" art adds nothing. That's why you can remove an object from its function and recontextualize it as an art piece. (Picasso's bicycle seat bull, for example - which is not art because it is a bicycle seat and handlebars but because of the reconfiguration of those objects into a sculpture.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sublime_(philosophy)