
Oh, maybe i am wrong then.I don’t think the F6 has anywhere near a significant following. I think the F3 takes that prize.

Which conversation are you referring to.?@CMoore I don't think the F6 was the topic of this conversation.

It doesn't matter! I NEED you all to convince me to buy an F3 because of the shutter sound of FM3a.![]()
Chris. I have a Nikon N6006 35mm SLR with an electronic shutter. Recently I checked its accuracy. I was astonished that it was accurate on all speeds I could check. (I couldn't;t check over around 1/125). Much better than my Nikkormat FT3, Mamiya RB67 and large format lenses (shutters in the lens). Everything on the camera worked well including the built-in meter.I wouldn't buy an F3. It's shutter is electronically controlled. If I buy another F, it's going to be an F2 for it's all mechanical features. I'd trade my F5 for an F2 if I could find someone willing to trade.
Everything on the camera worked well including the built-in meter.
The N6006 less lens goes for around $25 today. Just throw it away if it goes bad. I've had mine for thirty years or so, not used for the last twenty. It's like new and all modes work. PASM, braketing, timer, zoom, etc. I took it out last year and shot these with Tmax400.Everything works great on my F5 too... until it wont anymore. That's when the problem is. They aren't making replacement electronic parts for those cameras anymore. I learned that recently with the 654E I had purchased. No parts means no repair. Which is why I am going all mechanical with everything.
To me, the effing universe is the one in which a Nikon FM sells for $8. Permanent merry-go-round of novelty. A new computer every 3 years. A new smartphone every 2 years. The old ones go to junk (or are sold for ridiculous prices in the case of cameras).Nikon FM’s going for $100? $200?!? Was I abducted, anally probed, and deposited on some undiscovered planet? I bought one of these for like $8 in 2012.
This point is moot. AFAIK only the electrolytic capacitors represent danger, but they can be swapped/replaced for a newer and more reliable part with identical specs. When you hear "no replacement electronic parts" this can very possibly mean that your tech cannot or unwilling to solder, and is only willing to swap entire PCBs - and of course those aren't available.
Other than that, reliability of solid-state electronics should be far better than purely mechanical parts that may not have a replacement in production anymore. Anecdotally, looking at my humble collection of 8 film cameras, I have only experienced mechanical issues: the snapped spring in a Hasselblad/Zeiss shutter + rangefinder constantly getting out of alignment on a Fuji GF670. My biggest worry is rapid disappearance (and deterioration of quality of service) of knowledgeable repairmen. Even the "famous" technicians with 6+ months turnaround time are returning CLAd cameras with deteriorating foam seals still in place and misaligned focusing screens. I am not convinced that going all-mechanical will help.
The N6006 less lens goes for around $25 today. Just throw it away if it goes bad. I've had mine for thirty years or so, not used for the last twenty. It's like new and all modes work. PASM, braketing, timer, zoom, etc. I took it out last year and shot these with Tmax400.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/alanklein2000/albums/72157716777378896
What I don't get is how's Bessa is getting flak, while Zeiss Icon ZM is generally praised. Based on my research online, they're made in the same factory using the same parts bin.

| Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |
