George Mann
Member
.
That "old Agfa-Gevaert" as you erroneously call it was about only half of the company at its best.
The half that made film perhaps?
.
That "old Agfa-Gevaert" as you erroneously call it was about only half of the company at its best.
Yes exactly.. I think this might be what they used to call a “ teaching moment” ...It was less expensive at $13 a roll. Even then I thought it was too much! One was still able to buy 5 for $50 though so I didn't complain.
Yes it is!this is futile...
watch out for the troll known as sirius.The OP can reduce the operating cost of Fuji film by being more discriminate about when he fires the shutter.
OR because I think Leica prices for used cameras and lenses are high, that they must be money grubbing filthy pinko communist fascist flying pigs! Therefore I will boycott any sellers of used Leica cameras and lenses, be they companies or individuals. I will refuse to buy their Leicas until they give me a bunch of those cameras for free. I will also hold my breathe and refuse to go to the toilet until they meet my demands!
Because the price increase effects us all!Not sure why he wants to share it
My Uncle shot my parents' wedding on Kodachrome in the mid 1960s. He got that roll from a work mate who had been to the US. It was so expensive that my uncle waited 6 months before a suitable important event happened to use it. He never bought another.
Everyone except you knew about it. It is old news.Because the price increase effects us all!
you shoot fresh film instead of searching for ‘short date’ film from a well known store/reliable source;
and most important of all ... you aren’t just thankful that your favorite film is still made and sold.
Which is completely irrelevant to what I just stated!Everyone except you knew about it. It is old news.
Oh, now I get it...Kodachrome is the only film that is worth paying a premium price for.
FIlm looks different.Yes, film is expensive. The tipping point doesn't come until you start scanning it. I frankly don't understand why anyone would go to the time, trouble, and expense of shooting film if you are just going to scan it. If you want a digital file, shoot digital. If you like film, make analog prints.
What is unacceptable for me is the cost of Ektachrome super8 - I was really looking forward to super8 shooting / projecting but the price plus processing is so high. I think I can no longer do movie making, that is sad.
how about contacting freestyle and asking someone there about short date film or hunt photo/video they will probably have some or be able to put you on a contact list.Believe me, I looked. But it wasn't an exhaustive search.
how about if i change what i said to instead of complaining about the price of a boutique alternative process items ( at this point film is pretty much a boutique alternative process )Provia is hardly my favorite film.
plenty of better things to complain about
You are correct there.....have you seen the price of the new Aston Martin and there is a waiting list.
i know what you mean !You are correct there.....have you seen the price of the new Aston Martin and there is a waiting list.
What is unacceptable for me is the cost of Ektachrome super8
Kodachrome is the only film that is worth paying a premium price for.
a film that can no longer be purchased at any price.
Reminds me of the joke:Wait, now I'm confused. Am I supposed to hate Fuji, because a film they still produce is too expensive, or Kodak for discontinuing Kodachrome - a film that can no longer be purchased at any price.
Irony?
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |