Why not contact Kodak Alaris and request replacement?Thanks Paul. I'll dump the Tmax 100.
I'm not sure that this question was directed to me, however, if it was, I didn't know the film was affected until it was processed. I only had the one 'pro' 5 pack and shot it all BEFORE getting any of it processed. So, I didn't know until after the fact. As I mentioned earlier, it was this issue that brought me to this page in the first place, I never even heard of this issue until I had the film developed. I hope that makes sense. I've since had additional rolls processed from a newer batch and it was totally fine.If you know the film you have is from the affected batches, why would you continue to use it??
I'm not sure that this question was directed to me, however, if it was, I didn't know the film was affected until it was processed. I only had the one 'pro' 5 pack and shot it all BEFORE getting any of it processed. So, I didn't know until after the fact. As I mentioned earlier, it was this issue that brought me to this page in the first place, I never even heard of this issue until I had the film developed. I hope that makes sense. I've since had additional rolls processed from a newer batch and it was totally fine.
Ok, sorry.No, William - it wasn't directed to you
Thanks! The only one that has it is the building with the arches across the front of it. The word kodak is in the lower left hand corner. These image samples are pretty small as they were emailed to my computer from my phone. They're just small samples. All of these had the watermark, but using this 'high contrast' method made it invisible. I know these prints aren't "normal" and they completely ignore the zone system of a black and white print, but this is the only way I could use the negatives without seeing the watermarks.william wolfe I can hardly see any Kodak watermarks in your prints. Wow what a lot of birds on those wires - fun pictures.
I’m looking forward to shooting some of the new stuff. Until I get ahold of some I’ll be shooting 35mm and 4x5
If you want to take part in a class action, please follow this link about Defective Kodak Tmax.
Last seen Sep 2, 2018 according to his profile. He could have come here since then without logging in, though.Strangely enough it has suddenly struck me that I haven't seen much of rattymouse for quite a while. Has he left us?
Methinks that would be an impossibility. If he heard of the C-AL he would be handing out pitchforks and torches: I hope he is OK. He might be traveling? He has spent a lot of time with his family in the Far East &c. ......or couldn't he have simply chosen to NOT leave a message? View and not message?
As a fine art photographer and photography tour guide I had so much misery with this - that i am shifting to Ilford. I have had it with Kodak hiding behind their liability limitations while selling their defective rolls. If you want to take part in a class action, please follow this link about Defective Kodak Tmax.
I am still learning how Photrio works but it sounds as ifLast seen Sep 2, 2018 according to his profile. He could have come here since then without logging in, though.
It is possible although apart from his visceral dislike of Kodak but I cannot immediately recall anything in the way of behaviour towards fellow members that might cause a ban. So, is this a "hunch" or is there evidence for this?I think he was banned.
Yes, sometimes it can be more mysterious than the Pyramids at Giza, lol.I am still learning how Photrio works...
look for him to return soon, maybe under Ted Striker, which he now uses on RF forum
He kinda went off the rails when Fuji announced the end of Acros. It's just film, for crying out loud.
Anyways, I believe the watermark issue has been resolved and good on Kodak for getting to the bottom of it.
I loved that film, especially Ted's adventures on the way to and then in the airport:. I saw an unexpected versatility to both Robert Stack, Lloyd Bridges and Lesley Nielsen as actors especially Lesley Nielsen whom I had only seen in straight small bit-part roles previously.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?