You are correct, there is also some Catechol in HC-110. I have no idea why it would be in there at all, and given that it is present in much lower amount than Hydroquinone, I doubt that different pH will change its effect.
This may be true, but there are only few developer formulas out there with competing development agents, and HC-110 is not one of them. AFAIK HC-110 uses Dimezone-S and Hydroquinone, these are superadditive but not competing.
pKa of Ethanolamine (that's the active solvent, no so much the Diethanolamine) is 9.5, which means that at pH < 9 almost all of it will be protonated. Therefore I would not expect much of a difference between pH 8.9 and whatever the Acetic Acid spiked version ends up at.Reducers apart, a typical developer also has solvents which in the case of HC-110 could be Sodium Sulphite and Diethanalomine. The activity of solvents is a determining factor as far as grain is concerned. Now, would the solvents be as active in low pH working solution as they are in regular working solution? Apologies again if this is a naive question.
the question was whether Catechol and Hydroquinone would compete for oxidized Dimezone-S, and whether the ratio of activity between these two would significantly shift as pH is lowered. Question is also whether it matters given the high ratio of Hydroquinone to Catechol amounts.
Jay de Fehr refers to two carbonate based developers running at high pH values (Sandy King lists pH 10.9 for Pyrocat HD). Catechol will be plenty active on its own at this pH and may not much benefit from Phenidone, but things are likely different at the pH of HC-110.
Whatever these decades of developer research brought up, it never went public. Catechol was used for two of its properties: some compound formed with PPD (Meritol, MCM-100, ...) and its staining properties. In both cases Phenidone offered no improvement it seems.pH of HC-110 working solution is supposed to be around 9.0. If Catechol is super-additive with Phenidone/Dimezone at this pH then it should be easy to verify this experimentally and decades of developer research must have already done this and come to a conclusion about it. Am I missing something
I checked through various formula books and found nothing. In fact I did not even find a Metol-Catechol low pH developer. This doesn't mean much, others might find something ...And is there a Catechol-Phenidone developer that is known to work well at pH 9 or lower?
Is it magenta?I have no idea what Catechol is used for. I suppose it is the secret ingredient present to confuse everyone.
PE
Interesting. I have wondered about whether mixing of HC110 and Rodinal could be useful.Alan, to slow down a developer nobody has suggested sugar. Or Na2SO4. I even used methyl cellulose for fun.
Thanks for the pH of Hc-110; I made it a bit lower (8.8) with my fishtank meter.
1ml rodinal + 1ml HC-110 in 250 ml for a stand development is a good combo for contrasty document films altho that is not your problem. But, I noted the HC-110 swamped the pH of the rodinal big time. Not a budge. It has a very good buffering system. c.f. FX-55 with its dual system.
I don't know either, but I will take a wild guess that catechol, which is an isomer of hydroquinone, might be present as an impurity in hydroquinone synthesis.I have no idea what Catechol is used for. I suppose it is the secret ingredient present to confuse everyone.
PE
Michael Covington's excellent Unofficial HC-110 resource page says 1962: http://www.covingtoninnovations.com/hc110/Photo Engineer-
Somewhat off topic....Would you happen to know when HC-110 was introduced? I can't find any info on that.
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |