Hm! Didnt know medical xray still was used! I thought most was digitized long ago.
The report doesnt state its sources, so their estimate on film sales and color paper sales may be a lot of guesswork. Its not given that Fujifilm would be more transparent to them about their sales and production figures than what they are to the public.
Film xrays still have their uses, and I know some dental clinics in Canada were still using film simply because they already had a setup for it paid for, and their monthly costs in film and supplies was less than upgrading to the most basic digital option and all the systems that go with it.
Plus you still get a few people who just like their film more than digital.
Other points I remember from a random conversation with someone who was working with some medical relief program:
- Film can be read with almost any source for light in a pinch, and takes less power to run off batteries than a computer xray system. Useful if you're working somewhere prone to rolling blackouts or other unreliable power issues.
- A cabinet of film records aren't a target if a clinic gets robbed. Fancy looking computer gear is.
- Film doesn't care about cyber security.
- Training for handling film is fairly universal between any different system. Digital xray software can radically change after an update to the same system, let alone different vendors.
- You can field fix or replace a lot of critical issues that might harm a film based xray rig, and can spread your critical consumables out more in transit. You smash the computer running a digital your xray rig and you're waiting on a replacement.
But I'm curious if something like a need for a signed/logged physical copy for the xrays might be propping up its continued industrial use, or if that's also just "upgrades would cost us more than sticking with what we got" sort of thing.