Well, the thread naturally wandered to this, after the OP said he bought Contax G1 on post #60...A Rolleiflex is not a folder, see original post.
Update: No, do not try to fit a F model in this BYOB 7 bag. The plastic meter cover will be vulnerable to any external impact. Look at how snug the focus knob is on my 3.5E 'flex without a meter.
I did.(or just pull the meter block from your F, put a slug in the opening, and be done with the annoying and fairly useless protuberance.... I'll see myself out...)
Simply beautiful !!!
Zeiss Ikon Super Ikonta 530/16 Film Camera 120mm with Tessar 2.8/80mm
Somewhere I have a couple of pictures I took with one of these and they were so sharp you could cut yourself.
A Rolleiflex is not a folder, see original post.
Voigtländer Bessa 46 | Skopar ƒ/3.5/75 | Ilford Delta 100 | RO9
Less medication, more folders!Just another run-of-the-mill folder with horrible image quality that I don't want. (I took my OCD medication this morning).
And here's one from my Bessa 1:
Yup, Park Meadows, handheld. I was picking up takeout and it was about the first signs of life since the world closed down. My wife has a thing for Hello Kitty so it demanded a photo.
That’s a great couple of shots. You’re good!
You’re not tempted to do anything as stupid as shooting at 3.5 or close on MF with a Novar.You could make a case that a well made f/4.5 triplet is at least as good a lens as a Tessar faster than f.3.5, like the f/2.9 I have on my 532/16 Super Ikonta. They're indistinguishable at f/8 and smaller, and they both get pretty soft wide open. That Tessar at f/4 is very comparable to a Novar f/4.5 at f/5.6 -- only advantage is it's a stop faster at the same image quality, and honestly, I don't shoot a folder much in light where f/5.6 on ISO 400 give too slow shutter...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?