Questions about B&W film reversal

The Gap

H
The Gap

  • 4
  • 2
  • 43
Ithaki Steps

H
Ithaki Steps

  • 2
  • 0
  • 69
Pitt River Bridge

D
Pitt River Bridge

  • 5
  • 0
  • 77

Forum statistics

Threads
199,002
Messages
2,784,430
Members
99,765
Latest member
NicB
Recent bookmarks
2

dcy

Subscriber
Joined
May 9, 2025
Messages
518
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
35mm
{Moderator note: this was split off of an existing thread here: https://www.photrio.com/forum/threads/copper-sulphate-b-w-reversal-bleach.137943 The split-off point was at this post}

Bumping this thread.

I have spent the last week or so reading this thread. First, I'm going to summarize key details in one post, bot for myself and future readers. But I do have a few questions at the end.

My Context:


For me film reversal is relevant in the context of cyanotype. I currently use the "interpositive" method where I enlarge a photo to RC paper, contact print that to an ortho litho sheet film to make a large negative, and contact print that to make the cyanotype

For me, film reversal would be another way to get that large negative. The ortho litho films I have are Arista Ortho Litho Film and Inkpress Regent Royal Hard Dot Film.


Summary of The Reversal Process:


(1) General Workflow:

(aggregating posts #27, #38, #73, and #87)
  1. First developer.
  2. Stop bath.
  3. Bleach solution --- 5 min
  4. Sodium sulfite solution --- 2 min
  5. Undiluted store bought household ammonia --- 2 min
  6. ----- Q: Is this when I use the room lights fog the film?
  7. Wash.
  8. Develop again.
  9. Wash.
  10. Fix.

(2) Sodium Sulfite Working Solution:

(post #247)

Water ................... 800 ml
Sodium sulfite .......... 20 g
Water to 1L



(3) Standard Bleach (Working Solution):

(post #8 and external link to Tim Rudman's "The Master Photographer’s Lith Printing Course", now out of print).

Water ...................................... 800 ml
Copper (II) (Cupric) Sulfate................ 50 g
Concentrated Sulfuric Acid (EXTREME CARE!).. 6.5 ml
Sodium Chloride (Common Salt)............... 50 g
Water to make 1 L


You can use lower concentrations of sulfuric acid and adjust the volume. For example, battery acid is 30% sulfuric acid (post #214) so 6.5 ml becomes 22 ml. Drain cleaner is also an option.


(4) Citric Acid Variant (Working Solution):

Sulfuric acid is not an active ingredient, you just need a low pH to get copper chloride to react with metallic silver (post #228). This has encouraged @relistan and others to experiment with citric acid as milder alternative, suggesting the following recipe (post #73):

Water ...................................... 800 ml
Copper (II) (Cupric) Sulfate................ 50 g
Citric Acid (99.9%)......................... 10 g
Sodium Chloride (Common Salt)................ 50 g
Water to make 1 L


However, these efforts have had limited success and so far seem to result in staining and low Dmax (post #209).

Commentary: My understanding is that the issue is that citric acid is weaker than sulfuric. If that is the case, I might experiment with sulfamic acid. It's sold as a cleaner and if you do cyanotype you might already be using it to acidify buffered papers.


(5) Ammonium Chloride Variant (Working Solution):

(post #162)

Use ammonium chloride instead of sodium chloride. The bleach still has copper chloride to react with the silver, but also contains ammonium hydroxide. As silver chloride forms, it dissolves into the bleach itself and does not need a separate ammonia bath (post #162). But you still need the sodium sulfite bath. Best results were obtained with this formula:

Water ...................................... 800 ml
Copper (II) (Cupric) Sulfate................ 50 g
Citric Acid (99.9%)......................... 30 g
Ammonium Chloride ........................... 70 g
Water to make 1 L


Citric acid can be omitted, but with worse performance (slower bleach, more base fog).

Performance is film-dependent (post #172) and there's a risk that the ammonia hydroxide may react with sodium sulfite to make copper hydroxide (post #174), killing the active ingredient.


(6) External Variant / Ferric Chloride (Working Solution):

This variant has not been discussed here yet, but is totally based on the same principles. I found it on this YT video by Analog Resurgence (skip to 14:15).

The bleach is pure ferric chloride diluted 1+1. That is all. The mechanism is the same: Convert metallic silver into AgCl and dissolve it in ammonia. The video switches the order of the ammonia and clearing baths and the clearing bath is sodium metabisulfite instead of sulfite.

---- Q: Any idea why you'd replace sodium sulfite with metabisulfite?

Ferric chloride is used in electronic stores as a copper etchant (e.g. to make PCBs) and it is also available on Amazon.


(7) Making Adjustments:

The key variables are the initial exposure of the film and the 1st development time. In post #255, @Donald Qualls says:

"Either underexposure or underdevelopment in the first dev will result in dark final slides. If the slide is dark and there's not much separation between lights and darks, it's prob underdeveloped; if the separation is good, but everything is too dark, it's likely underexposed. If you can't be sure which, it's probably both, so start with increasing first development, then adjust exposure"

Another option to lighten the final positive overall, especially in the highlights, is to add 1 g/L of sodium thiosulfate to the first developer (post #277).

Comments: Another option is to "flash" the film, thought that is mainly for sheet film. This article by Liam Lawless has a lot to say about using a flash exposure to control contrast in the context of enlarged negatives via "classic" film reversal with potassium dichromate or permanganate.


My Questions:


(1) Can someone clarify for me what the sodium sulfite bath is for?

Post #265 says that it's to remove the silver citrate. That sounds like its only needed if you use citric acid for the bleach, but that can't be the full story because sulfite is also used in the original post with sulfuric acid. Post #39 says that without sodium sulfite you risk staining. Post #87 says that skipping sodium sulfite had no detrimental effect.

The YT video I linked above says that without the clearing bath, the film will be stained and look kind of sepia. But that might be specific to ferric chloride and may not be true for copper chloride.

So... I'm confused... What exactly gets removed by the sodium sulfite clearing bath?


(2) Why do some clearing baths use sodium sulfite and others metabisulfite?

I notice that film reversal with dichromate also uses sodium sulfite, just like the copper chloride one discussed in this thread. But bleach with potassium permanganate is cleared with sodium metabisulfite, as is the one with ferric chloride above.


(3) Does anyone know if any of my ortho litho films (Arista Ortho Litho vs Inkpress Regent Royal) are compatible or incompatible with this reversal process?

@Quiver2 said that some "process" films used for making internegatives might have an emulsion with AgCl, which is completely incompatible with this process. I do not know if ortho films fall into that category.


(4) Why do some posts suggest a paper developer for the first developer?

For example, posts #255 and #276 suggest Dektol 2+1.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,305
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
1) As I understand it, a sulfite clearing bath for copper chloride based bleach systems is a carry-over from the more traditional dichromate and permanganate bleaches; as an anti-oxidant, it does a very good job neutralizing the strong oxidizers commonly used to bleach developed silver. I don't know of any reason it would be required for a bleach that doesn't use a strong oxidizer.

2) This is almost certainly a matter of pH control. Sodium sulfite is alkaline enough to act as the accelerator in some developers, while metabisulfite is very weakly acidic.

3) I'd be very surprised if ortho films were based on silver chloride. AgCl is sensitive only to deep blue and UV, and very slow (slower even than ortho litho films, which are commonly similar speed to enlarging paper). Some contact printing papers used silver chloride, but I don't know of any of those still being manufactured.

4) First developer for reversal is typically taken far past the "normal" contrast point, and a highly active developer (like low-dilution Dektol) can get there with less time spent than something like HC-110 or D-76.
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,305
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
OP
OP
dcy

dcy

Subscriber
Joined
May 9, 2025
Messages
518
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
35mm
1) As I understand it, a sulfite clearing bath for copper chloride based bleach systems is a carry-over from the more traditional dichromate and permanganate bleaches; as an anti-oxidant, it does a very good job neutralizing the strong oxidizers commonly used to bleach developed silver. I don't know of any reason it would be required for a bleach that doesn't use a strong oxidizer.

Thanks!

Is ferric chloride a strong oxidizer? The YT video says that the clearing bath is "very important" but doesn't go into details.


2) This is almost certainly a matter of pH control. Sodium sulfite is alkaline enough to act as the accelerator in some developers, while metabisulfite is very weakly acidic.

In the context of a clearing bath for this specific type of reversal process that turns Ag into AgCl, do you think it matters whether you use sodium sulfite or metabisulfite? Your comment above seems to say that the clearing bath probably doesn't do anything anyway.


3) I'd be very surprised if ortho films were based on silver chloride. AgCl is sensitive only to deep blue and UV, and very slow (slower even than ortho litho films, which are commonly similar speed to enlarging paper). Some contact printing papers used silver chloride, but I don't know of any of those still being manufactured.

Thanks!

4) First developer for reversal is typically taken far past the "normal" contrast point, and a highly active developer (like low-dilution Dektol) can get there with less time spent than something like HC-110 or D-76.

Are paper developers, as a group, more active than film developers? I have Ilford Multigrade.
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,305
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
Is ferric chloride a strong oxidizer?

Not the way potassium dichromate or potassium permanganate are. I'm not actually a chemist, but I think the ferric chloride works by providing a combination of ions that can react to convert metallic silver to silver chloride, which is technically oxidation -- but ferric chloride wouldn't be something I'd consider an oxidizer for, for instance, rocket propellant.

Your comment above seems to say that the clearing bath probably doesn't do anything anyway.

I don't know that it does do anything in a copper sulfate/copper chloride/ferric chloride bleach system. But see above; I'm not a chemist, I just have an inkling...

Are paper developers, as a group, more active than film developers?

Generally, they are. Most have similar print development times (one to three minutes), and some (Dektol, PQ Universal, and probably most once you know how much) can be diluted for film development -- Dektol is used at 1+1 or 1+2 for prints, but 1+9 for film. Dektol uses carbonate alkali, vs. D-76/ID-11 with borax; carbonate will have a higher pH so the developing agent will be more active.
 
OP
OP
dcy

dcy

Subscriber
Joined
May 9, 2025
Messages
518
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
35mm
Generally, they are. Most have similar print development times (one to three minutes), and some (Dektol, PQ Universal, and probably most once you know how much) can be diluted for film development -- Dektol is used at 1+1 or 1+2 for prints, but 1+9 for film.

Thanks!

The article by Liam Lawless says what you said, so I must have read it at some point in the past but I evidently did not retain that information. The article has useful details (at least for me):

...silver must develop right down to the film base in the deep shadows, so as well as extra exposure, a long development is needed. Print developers are generally more energetic than film developers, and most should be suitable... However, the use of Warm-tone developers is not recommended.

Develop at the ordinary working dilution for 5-6 min.... 6 min should suffice for just about any lith film, and is a good place to start. Insufficient development manifests itself as high fog (i.e. veiled clear areas), while excessive development tends to eat away delicate shadow detail. It can be confusing whether such defects are due to errors in development or exposure, which is one good reason why development should be a constant in the process. The only reason I can think of for times longer than six minutes would be if your film has a very thick emulsion.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 28, 2016
Messages
2,756
Location
India
Format
Multi Format
Some contact printing papers used silver chloride, but I don't know of any of those still being manufactured.

Copper Sulphate bleach paper doesn't work well with Chloro-Bromide papers as well. It removes some unexposed halides resulting in poor DMax after the second development. Those who shoot photographic paper in camera and want to reversal process it must avoid using Copper Sulphate bleach. Dichromate and Permanganate bleach work best for this application though some of have had success with Peroxide-Citric Acid bleach.

1753429793981.png
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,098
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Out of curiosity, any idea why papers use AgCl + AgBr but film uses AgBr + AgI ?

Speed?
Native spectral sensitivity?
 
OP
OP
dcy

dcy

Subscriber
Joined
May 9, 2025
Messages
518
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
35mm
Speed?
Native spectral sensitivity?

I tried to look into this but I'm out of my depth. I did learn a couple of things though:

(1) These lecture notes from a college in India say:

Silver bromide (AgBr) is the most widely used of the silver salts for paper and film products...
Silver iodide (AgI) ... [its speed] is approximately one-third that of silver bromide
Silver chloride (AgCl) ... Its speed is approximately one-eighth that of silver bromide.

(2) This paper goes into the details of the photochemistry of AgCl, AgBr, AgI. This paper is way over my head, but perhaps others can glean something of value from it.

Having said that, the paper did say one thing that I understood:

... Accordingly, the ionic relaxation time in AgCl grains was two or three orders of magnitude longer than that in AgBr grains. This result indicates that, on exposure of AgCl grains for a short time, trapped electrons are inclined, not to react with interstitial silver ions, but to recombine with positive holes, and that photographic performance on exposure for a short time is therefore deteriorated more intensely in an AgCl emulsion than in an AgBr emulsion.

Ok. So the latent image from AgCl will vanish sooner. That makes it unsuitable for film. While AgI is the opposite.
 
OP
OP
dcy

dcy

Subscriber
Joined
May 9, 2025
Messages
518
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
35mm
Another question:

The second development is "to completion".

For normal film development time you have to adjust the development time to the particular film + developer + temperature combination. It takes like 15 minutes to develop Kentmere 400 in D-76 at 20°C. But if I am developing to completion, can't I just reuse the same paper developer that I used in the first development step and rely on its potency to get the job done quickly?
 
OP
OP
dcy

dcy

Subscriber
Joined
May 9, 2025
Messages
518
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
35mm
This thread seems to have wandered well off of Copper sulphate bleach. @dcy I suggest a separate help thread so we can keep this one about the copper bleach

Perhaps the moderators can split this thread starting at my post #291. That's the post that bumped the thread. I thought my initial questions at least were on topic, but I can also see them as a broad set of questions about this type of reversal process. I could see this as a separate thread about "film reversal with copper sulfate and similar bleaches".
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,098
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Perhaps the moderators can split this thread starting at my post #291. That's the post that bumped the thread. I thought my initial questions at least were on topic, but I can also see them as a broad set of questions about this type of reversal process. I could see this as a separate thread about "film reversal with copper sulfate and similar bleaches".

It would help if you started the thread yourself, and then Report that first post, with a request that includes which posts you think should be moved, and a link back to this thread.
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
23,105
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
It would help if you started the thread yourself, and then Report that first post, with a request that includes which posts you think should be moved, and a link back to this thread.
Yeah, in general that would be helpful. I happened upon this post and just split off everything starting at what was post 291 (and is now #1 in the present thread).

@dcy see here your new thread; good luck with the list of questions & reversal process. Be sure to have a look at other relevant threads as well; e.g. this one: https://www.photrio.com/forum/threads/first-attempt-at-black-and-white-reversal.214761
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,098
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Yeah, in general that would be helpful. I happened upon this post and just split off everything starting at what was post 291 (and is now #1 in the present thread).

@dcy see here your new thread; good luck with the list of questions & reversal process. Be sure to have a look at other relevant threads as well; e.g. this one: https://www.photrio.com/forum/threads/first-attempt-at-black-and-white-reversal.214761

Thanks @koraks - I didn't have time to attend to this yeterday.
 

MCB18

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2023
Messages
966
Location
Colorado
Format
Medium Format
So, general question, to test my B&W reversal bleach to see if it is still effective after a few months, what is the process? Develop some fogged film until it is completely black, put it through the bleaching steps, then see if the film is cleared?
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom