I would direct you back to post #40, last sentence in the post. Please read more carefully.Read the posts please. There is nothing said about an enlarger.
This is a plausible thought only at this point, but look at the original post carefully. It appears to have some "modeling" in the sliver image itself. As if the image or support changed somehow in the sprockets and image areas.
PE
Can't say that I'm familiar with a holder that has scalloped edges like that, but I'll bet a penny that this has baked in an enlarger or some kind of projector for too long.
This is actually a very good point. Why would you project (or mount) a negative? A positive image, yes- but for a negative.....hmmm....but what would be the need to hold a negative in a high powered projector?
and could the localised warping be due to the edges of the negative not being held flat (outside of the holder) while being heated?
This is actually a very good point. Why would you project (or mount) a negative? A positive image, yes- but for a negative.....hmmm....
I would direct you back to post #40, last sentence in the post. Please read more carefully.
Seeing this thread has got me thinking about something. I have a 4x5 negative that his curled up and brittle. Maybe it is nitrate film? did they make nitrate 4x5 film? Anyway, anyone with thoughts about how to print the thing? maybe cut some strategic incisions in it and smoosh it between a couple pieces of glass?
How old is it? .
| Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |
