A dream of mine would be to see a Western film shot on B&W IMAX, using turn of the 19th-20th century western sets. All that dirt, grit, old wooden buildings, etc, would look great in B&W on IMAX.
Here is a copy with parts of an email from Andrew Oran from Fotokem back in 2015:
"We do not currently have the ability to process 65mm black and white negative (or 70mm b/w positive) here at FotoKem. We do have a decommissioned black and white 65mm processor – one that was previously in operation at IMAGICA USA, up until 2004 – but we have never made it operational. It would take some effort.
I’ll re-visit this with our engineering team on Monday and get back to you with a current assessment of our options."
He later replied:
"We’ve reviewed this internally, and it would not be possible for us to support 65/70mm black and white processing: the technical challenges, while theoretically surmountable, are just too great given current lab resources."
And in case anyone wonders, the idea I had at the time is dead in the water.
With the "autheticity" caveat that most western movies didn't look like the "old west" and more (white) people made their living creating westerns than even lived in the west prior to 1900....
A movie about the Brady photographers, maybe Carleton Watkins, might be an appropriate story though.
Did you see "The Lighthouse"?
I asked Andrew yesterday if FotoKem can now still do 65mm B&W processing in the future. His response was:
"Hi Scott,
65mm black and white negative processing could be reestablished on a large enough project. It’s a huge undertaking each time we switch the 65mm negative processor over to black and white. We have never established 70mm black and white print processing - that was not possible for a number of reasons.
Andrew"
So it looks like all the 70mm " black and white " prints are on color print stock which makes perfect sense. So cool
We don't go to movies for authenticity, we go for entertainment. No matter how 'real' a movie is, it's still a fantasy.
Kind of my point. Might I suggest "Sixguns and Society"?
For those interested in D96, I dug into my old tech info:
View attachment 340607View attachment 340608
Yes, I'm aware of the actual history of the Wild West. However, westerns are a genre loosely based on the western expansion and settlement. Star Wars, the first one, is a western. It's more of a style than a genre at this point.
Star Wars, the first one, is closely based on Kurosawa's "The Hidden Fortress." This is the kind of thing that film nerds say, but if you see "The Hidden Fortress," it's clear. Star Wars has certain elements of Westerns, but also of space operas, and WW II aircraft carrier/bomber movies.
Back to the original post, if one went back to older Western sets and shot a new Western on IMAX, you'd have to be careful that the fancy new format didn't reveal too much of the pasteboard illusion of the old sets, unless that was actually the semi-artificial look you were aiming for. Like the way that HDTV made news-type and other programs change all the pre-HD set pieces.
Star Wars, the first one, is closely based on Kurosawa's "The Hidden Fortress." This is the kind of thing that film nerds say, but if you see "The Hidden Fortress," it's clear. Star Wars has certain elements of Westerns, but also of space operas, and WW II aircraft carrier/bomber movies.
Back to the original post, if one went back to older Western sets and shot a new Western on IMAX, you'd have to be careful that the fancy new format didn't reveal too much of the pasteboard illusion of the old sets, unless that was actually the semi-artificial look you were aiming for. Like the way that HDTV made news-type and other programs change all the pre-HD set pieces.
Westerns and Kurosawa had a really fascinating cross fertilization thing going on. Yojimbo was clearly inspired by westerns and was in turn remade into a western (Fistful of Dollars.) Seven Samurai was remade into The Magnificient Seven but also had shades of western in it.
This past week both the PBS Newshour and the New York Times had pieces on Oppenheimer. Irritatingly, to me anyway, while both talked about it being shot on film, neither made any mention that the film was manufactured by Eastman Kodak. Indeed the Newshour segment included the line "...using newly developed black and white as well as color IMAX film." One does get to hear Christopher Nolan say "I like to shoot celluloid film..."
The Newshour piece can be seen here:
The New York Times article, published July 17, is about the movie being shot on film and being available for viewing in (some) IMAX theaters projected from 70 mm. Again there is no mention of Eastman Kodak's contribution. It does contain the evocative line "...movies shot and projected with a physical, photochemical product..."
See: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/17/movies/oppenheimer-imax-christopher-nolan.html
David
There's 3D IMAX?
David
I went last friday to a 70mm screening. Fantastic! I did really notice the difference in character of the projection as it appear with different contrast, color and a softer rendition compared to digital. As I was leaving the theater with my friend, we got a strip of film with imprinted 70mm frames of the movie, stating "Shot on Kodak 65mm film"
Edit: Here is a quick grab I did of it out of the theater.
View attachment 344778
Were these freebies? Eastman Kodak is advertising. Good for them.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?