removed account4
Subscriber
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2003
- Messages
- 29,833
- Format
- Hybrid
Did they ever have a functioning prototype.?
yup and a instagram feed showing bunches of images made with it.
Did they ever have a functioning prototype.?
They claimed to have a working prototype but the pictures of the "prototype" do not bear this out. The exchangeable mount is far too flimsy to ever function, the attachment of the mount to body is nonexistant, no details are shown but the parts simply aren't there. Same for the exchangeable back. Where did they get the shutter? Where did they get the mirror box assembly? Does anyone recall seeing pictures of these assemblies?yup and a instagram feed showing bunches of images made with it.
The Ihagee project was a fraud, pure and simple. Their "prototype" was a photoshopped picture - not even well photoshopped.It's speculation, but the most plausible explanation for the lack of communication is that the Reflex team isn't a team anymore after they realized they couldn't deliver, and now they are fighting how to divide the debt, because the money has already been invested.
Yet another sad story which proves that producing a new film camera for a reasonable price is an illusion. The IHagee project, with a far more experienced team and a relatively simple objective, shows that it even isn't possible to resurrect an existing model.
I have said it before, if you compare these meager attempts with the Nikon F6 it's an absolute bargain.
The Ihagee project was a fraud, pure and simple. Their "prototype" was a photoshopped picture - not even well photoshopped.
That team is questionable. The firm they allegedly worked for turned out to be fake.The IHagee project, with a far more experienced team and a relatively simple objective, shows that it even isn't possible to resurrect an existing model.
That team is questionable. The firm they allegedly worked for turned out to be fake.
One person related to that campaign shows up at another photography Kickstarter project and under a firm that I could not find a trace of.
Smarter? Less likely to get caught. Scumbags. And lying sacks of sh!t. In fairness, I think the Reflex people are just idiots without a lot of integrity. The Elbaflex crew was actively dishonest from square one, some are involved with other very questionable products - iirc the "Goerz Citograph" is one, and another is some sort of Busch "reissue"?Well, it's common practice for many camera brands to use photoshopped images or 3D printed mockup's as a preview for the final product. You can't deny the Elbaflex is an existing camera (Kiev 19M). I don't think it's a scam, it simply wasn't attractive enough to get enough backers.
I assume they played safe from the beginning and didn't invest much money in registering an Ihagee GmbH and setting up an extensive organization. Much smarter than the Reflex team.
Translation: "We're lost".They must be reading this forum. They posted an update today called "Overdue" and it's a bunch of mumbling about how expensive and hard it is to manufacture a camera. Well duh! Dead Link Removed
I love their use of acronyms with parentheses to explain them to us ignorant folk, also spiffy terms such as "film ecosystem".Since they haven't selected a "general manufacturer", I'm not sure how they determined how much it would cost to manufacture the cameras.
From that article they say this......... "In April, our CEO Laurence has been invited for a tour at the facilities of Kodak in Rochester NY to discuss film photography. We will make sure to share our experiences with you here and on Instagram."They must be reading this forum. They posted an update today called "Overdue" and it's a bunch of mumbling about how expensive and hard it is to manufacture a camera. Well duh! Dead Link Removed
While it might be interesting to do, taking a tour of Kodak doesn't help get the cameras actually made. It is time away from the project at hand.I assume, even at this stage of the game, if Kodak Invites You To Rochester to discuss film photography, you must be a "Somebody".?
....and the whole film back thing sounds nice. plenty of MF cameras use this system, i always thought it was odd that no 35mm system was made the same way ...
Ah yes, but it diverts from the fact: that There Is No Camera.While it might be interesting to do, taking a tour of Kodak doesn't help get the cameras actually made. It is time away from the project at hand.
Plus, the Ektra and Rolleis really exist! You can buy one! You can even buy one of each!Oh, but there were! Behold the wonderful Kodak Ektra:
https://www.cameraquest.com/ektra.htm
Also the Rollei 2000 and 3003:
https://www.cameraquest.com/rol3003.htm
From that article they say this......... "In April, our CEO Laurence has been invited for a tour at the facilities of Kodak in Rochester NY to discuss film photography. We will make sure to share our experiences with you here and on Instagram."
Anybody know who (Their CEO) Laurence is.?
I assume, even at this stage of the game, if Kodak Invites You To Rochester to discuss film photography, you must be a "Somebody".?
From that article they say this......... "In April, our CEO Laurence has been invited for a tour at the facilities of Kodak in Rochester NY to discuss film photography. We will make sure to share our experiences with you here and on Instagram."
Anybody know who (Their CEO) Laurence is.?
I assume, even at this stage of the game, if Kodak Invites You To Rochester to discuss film photography, you must be a "Somebody".?
Oh, but there were! Behold the wonderful Kodak Ektra:
https://www.cameraquest.com/ektra.htm
Also the Rollei 2000 and 3003:
https://www.cameraquest.com/rol3003.htm
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |