The one thing I don't understand not being talked about more is highlight detail in film, as opposed to the severe problems that digital still has with highlights. Even the best digital cameras continue to struggle with blown highlights. One need only look at the average sports broadcast that features a quick transition between ground and sky, or has a lot of sky in it (like behind a subject). When I make a picture with film, I know that I can and will get just about everything that I'm looking at. Not so much with digital. While filmmakers generally have more opportunity to control for lighting situations, there's still a problem with highlight retention, and also how they're rendered in general. HBO's True Detective makes an excellent example-- the first part of Season 1 was done on film, and the skies/highlights were all well controlled. Later on in series, when filming was done with a digital camera, highlights were sometimes completely lost. It's not really good to look at when it happens.
I don't see that being discussed much one way or the other (out in the world, even amongst those who have a stake in it).