• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

My PC-512 Borax Developer

Forum statistics

Threads
202,628
Messages
2,843,233
Members
101,413
Latest member
USMC46
Recent bookmarks
0
Can I ask: At what size of print might the less grain of PC-512 be evident in say a 35mm neg and then a 645 neg? To my eyes( possibly less discerning?) the FX1 full size scan looks better in the sense of having more detail than the PC-512 one

Thanks

pentaxuser
I don't know if I see more detail in the FX1 print, but I do seem to see more shadow detail and the slightly lighter sky. I certainly like the sky rendering with PC-512. I shoot nearly 100% medium format so grain from either one is fine with me.
 
I don't know if I see more detail in the FX1 print, but I do seem to see more shadow detail and the slightly lighter sky. I certainly like the sky rendering with PC-512. I shoot nearly 100% medium format so grain from either one is fine with me.

Thanks, yes that's what I see as well so for me it's a question of what size of print in 35mm does the lesser graín of PC-512 become an advantage as I do shoot as much 35mm as 120

pentaxuser
 
Can I ask: At what size of print might the less grain of PC-512 be evident in say a 35mm neg and then a 645 neg? To my eyes( possibly less discerning?) the FX1 full size scan looks better in the sense of having more detail than the PC-512 one

Thanks

pentaxuser

In 35mm that level of grain different will be apparent at 5x7 I think, but certainly by 8x10
 
I have not run a side by side test but still think this developer compares favourably with proprietary developers in most respects.


I think it's as good or even better than some "off the shelf" developers. Certainly no complaints from me. Plus, it has the benefit of having a really great shelf life. I actually think Gadget Gainer would highly approve of Karl's PC-512.
 
I have not run a side by side test but still think this developer compares favourably with proprietary developers in most respects.



Those are terrific!

A couple questions if I may. What film/format were these shot on? How much post-processing sharpening and curve adjustment did you do?
 
Those are terrific!

A couple questions if I may. What film/format were these shot on? How much post-processing sharpening and curve adjustment did you do?
You can click on the image and it will bring up the Flickr image. Shows it's 35mm P&S Ricoh cameras. Not bad!
 
Ive shot a few rolls in my Canon sure shot; still working out the details but it's always nice to have alternatives
 
I have not run a side by side test but still think this developer compares favourably with proprietary developers in most respects.



Thanks! And that looks great.

I have, and it does compare favourably.

I appreciate the testing that both and you have done on this! I still owe everyone an updated blog post. I resolve to use part of the time I have off next week to make it happen!
 
How do you perceive sharpness (acutance) and compensating effect compared to Xtol? I’m quite new to DIY developers, still learning.
 
How do you perceive sharpness (acutance) and compensating effect compared to Xtol? I’m quite new to DIY developers, still learning.

Very close to Xtol results and you can't go wrong with either. PC-512 has better shelf life and the fact you can make it yourself is a real plus. PC-512 might show slightly more well defined grain, but that really isn't a problem. Not to me anyway!
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom