I have a 65mm super on a very slightly recessed gray board (probably intended for a 970) the recessed boards for a vh seem to have a deeper recessed.
I never realized the cable release sleeve had threads (doh)
The newer 65mm and 75mm is in a deeper lens board and is painted in black. It sits further forward to clear the vh and vh-r camera.
But you don't need it. The socket is threaded in the bottom. It is nice to have though because it is faster to change lenses. I have attached pictures of 2 of my lenses, one is from the 900 series and the other is from the ER series. Both have a thread for standard cable releases, that is what is in the pictures.
Ive been reading abit more on using wide angle lenses with this camera. If using a 65mm is then a recessed lensboard necessary due to the bed? If a recessed lensboard is necessary will that cause any other limitations?
But you don't need it. The socket is threaded in the bottom. It is nice to have though because it is faster to change lenses. I have attached pictures of 2 of my lenses, one is from the 900 series and the other is from the ER series. Both have a thread for standard cable releases, that is what is in the pictures.
If you are using the rangefinder, read the manual for the VH-R and you'll see on page 11 that some lenses share the same infinity stop. Yhe 180mm telephoto uses the same infinity as the 120mm non telephoto, the 90/5.6 uses the same stop as the 105/3.5, and the 65/7 and the 75/5.6 share the same infinity stop:
View attachment 385784
You can mount any lens to a horseman board and adjust the infinity stops to match the lenses you choose, but if you want it to work as in the manual, you need the 65 and 75 to be in the same type of lens board--if the 65 is grey, you want the 75 in a grey board. If the 65 is in a black board you need a 75 in a black baord. This is because the about of recess in each board is done to match infinity for both. (I think the other matched lenses like 120/180 and 90/105 are on flat boards so they don't have the same issue.)
The front movements are exactly the same on the VH and the VH-R. Same body same front standard. The VH-R has a viewfinder / rangefinder on the top and the VH has a trim panel on the top. Because of the revolving back on the VH and VH-R when you revolve to vertical the bed intrudes into the image. Horseman even thought of that too, there are 2 red dots on the front standard that you align raising the front standard slightly. I just turn the camera like a 985. You can't close the camera until you drop the lens again. When you use the 75mm this is not a problem. I personally think that the 985 with the late 65mm is the best combination for movements, because of the thinner body and the recessed boards.
I have used my VH-R with my 6x4.5 Mamiya RB67 film backs hand held by turning the viewfinder to vertical and the back to horizontal and using the 120mm frame lines with the 90mm lens. These cameras have a lot of capability. I was first introduced to them in 1983 by an acquaintance and bought my first one in 1984.
As an aside, the "arms" of the 980 block the shift with the 75 and 65mm lenses. I have aftermarket, stainless steel arms which are like the arms of the 985 camera. Will sell them to 980 owners for $5.00 + cost of shipping. PM me.
Also have extra infinity stops.
I just turn mine on its side when using the 65mm. It has a tripod socket so it is easy to do. Then I have both rise and fall for the front standard. That is part of using a technical camera, finding the work around's for it's limitations.
Is this relevant for the VH?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?