Look what the cat dragged in...

Peaceful

D
Peaceful

  • 2
  • 8
  • 66
Cycling with wife #2

D
Cycling with wife #2

  • 1
  • 1
  • 42
Time's up!

D
Time's up!

  • 0
  • 0
  • 47
Green room

A
Green room

  • 4
  • 2
  • 94
On The Mound

A
On The Mound

  • 6
  • 0
  • 97

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,242
Messages
2,771,523
Members
99,579
Latest member
Estherson
Recent bookmarks
0
OP
OP

Huss

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Messages
9,058
Location
Hermosa Beach, CA
Format
Multi Format
It is just the leader and trailer, yes?
Yes.

It seems that the start arrows are inaccurate as they are for 120 film. In my GW690III I managed 15 1/3 images, but there was plenty of room for 16. The start arrows come up too soon for 220 film.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,468
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Weird thing - it stinks like mothballs. Never noticed the smell of backing paper before on any other 120 or 220 films that I have used
I wonder if this came from a bunch of long stored 120 backing paper.
Does anyone recognize the backing paper?
I don't have any 220 backing paper - other than as part of a few remaining rolls of Portra that I don't want to open now - so I can't measure the 220 starting position for you.
 

foc

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2010
Messages
2,507
Location
Sligo, Ireland
Format
35mm
I wonder if this came from a bunch of long stored 120 backing paper.
Does anyone recognize the backing paper?
I don't have any 220 backing paper - other than as part of a few remaining rolls of Portra that I don't want to open now - so I can't measure the 220 starting position for you.

From a quick Google search , the backing paper appears to be Shanghai GP3 backing paper for 120.
The mothball smell says a lot, I think.
I am no 220 film expert but the photo of the backing paper looks like it was 120 paper cut and stuck to 220 film. To me it looks a bit like a homemade job.

b74ee877554db3590fbc235329163b63.jpg

Tri-X on top
Shanghai on bottom
 
Last edited:
OP
OP

Huss

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Messages
9,058
Location
Hermosa Beach, CA
Format
Multi Format
From a quick Google search , the backing paper appears to be Shanghai GP3 backing paper for 120.
The mothball smell says a lot, I think.
I am no 220 film expert but the photo of the backing paper looks like it was 120 paper cut and stuck to 220 film. To me it looks a bit like a homemade job.

View attachment 258001
Tri-X on top
Shanghai on bottom

Well yes, my photos of the backing paper in this thread show the text 120 all over it.
 
OP
OP

Huss

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Messages
9,058
Location
Hermosa Beach, CA
Format
Multi Format
Film dried over night, will scan this evening. There are no identifier marks, or any sort of edge marks, on the film.
 
OP
OP

Huss

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Messages
9,058
Location
Hermosa Beach, CA
Format
Multi Format
The film has excellent sharpness and very low grain - at least developed in DF96 Monobath.
Of note one can see a vertical line on the left edge in the first pic. This is visible in a few of the images. So now I need to figure out if this is a flaw in the film, in the camera (GW690III) or in developing (perhaps the cheapo Arista reel is causing it?)
Never a dull moment!


[/url


[url=https://flic.kr/p/2jZGiEb]
[/url]
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,248
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
Dark in the print is low density. That'll be either a film defect or a developing problem, since you don't have a focal plane shutter that could produce that kind of issue. The streak is lengthwise on the film, so very unlikely the Arista reel is to blame. I don't know what in developing could cause this kind of streak (as opposed to a tide mark or something related to solution level) -- so to my eye, this looks like a film defect.
 
OP
OP

Huss

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Messages
9,058
Location
Hermosa Beach, CA
Format
Multi Format
Dark in the print is low density. That'll be either a film defect or a developing problem, since you don't have a focal plane shutter that could produce that kind of issue. The streak is lengthwise on the film, so very unlikely the Arista reel is to blame. I don't know what in developing could cause this kind of streak (as opposed to a tide mark or something related to solution level) -- so to my eye, this looks like a film defect.

If something on the reel was damaging/scraping the film, that could come through as a dark streak. Where the streak is is where the film continuously passes through the feeding ramp as the film is loaded onto the reel.
If there is build up of dirt/chemical residue there it could cause this. Or perhaps something in the Fuji on the pressure plate. Or it is a film defect..

I am going to soak my reels then rinse them off, and check the Fuji if I can see anything. Then if I still get this it points to a film defect.

The actual images are much sharper/clearer etc than these Flickr downgraded samples. So whatever the film stock is, I really like it. And it seems to be accurately rated at ISO 400. Those two shots were exposed at 1/500 f13.
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,248
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
Where the streak is is where the film continuously passes through the feeding ramp as the film is loaded onto the reel.
If there is build up of dirt/chemical residue there it could cause this.

Lab Box? I'd normally expect pressure marks to show light in the print, but if emulsion was scraped away, it's possible it could print dark.
 
OP
OP

Huss

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Messages
9,058
Location
Hermosa Beach, CA
Format
Multi Format
Lab Box? I'd normally expect pressure marks to show light in the print, but if emulsion was scraped away, it's possible it could print dark.

Not lab box, just regular reels. There is that feeding ramp on the Arista reels where you insert the film to load it, and the entire roll passes through it as you wind it in.
It's that, or something w the camera, or something with the film itself.
https://www.freestylephoto.biz/55043-Arista-Premium-Plastic-Developing-Reel

Of course this is the first time I've seen this issue.
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,248
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
Oh, right. I have actual Paterson reels, they don't have that big plastic protrusion.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,468
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
I've been using those Arista reels (badged as AP) for years, with zero problems. I've been using them with Kodak films of various types, but I frequently load two 120 rolls on to a reel.
 
OP
OP

Huss

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Messages
9,058
Location
Hermosa Beach, CA
Format
Multi Format
Yeah, I've never had issues before. Checked the Fuji - looks squeaky clean inside, so that's ruled out. So it's either the reel or the film. Not much I can do about it if it's the film apart from use up the remaining rolls! We'll see how the rest works out.
I could shoot a regular roll of 120 in the Fuji and use the same reel and see if that has the mark.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,468
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
It could be the leaders/trailers and the handling when they were attached.
And one final possibility - does the 220 setting on your Fuji move the pressure plate? Could there be a pinpoint light leak there?
 
OP
OP

Huss

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Messages
9,058
Location
Hermosa Beach, CA
Format
Multi Format
It could be the leaders/trailers and the handling when they were attached.
And one final possibility - does the 220 setting on your Fuji move the pressure plate? Could there be a pinpoint light leak there?

You have to manually flip the pressure plate to the 220 side. I had no issues a couple o weeks ago w Trix 220.
 

BradS

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
8,119
Location
Soulsbyville, California
Format
35mm
but wouldn’t a light leak show as bright on the print? The defect is the dark line visible in the sky in two of the three photos above, is it not?
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,248
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
Must be a dark leak.

Whenever I have a dark leak, it lets the dark out. Never seen one run the other way...
 

Lachlan Young

Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2005
Messages
4,898
Location
Glasgow
Format
Multi Format
It may well be either an interlayer drying/ flow mark, or a piece of dust in the scanning system.
 

grat

Member
Joined
May 8, 2020
Messages
2,045
Location
Gainesville, FL
Format
Multi Format
Well, that would tie in with the concept of light bulbs actually being Dark Suckers. It only stands to reason that if they consume dark, they have the potential to leak it.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom