I keep hearing this, but is it true? How much mainstream film do, ahem, Lomographers use, and how can we tell? I appreciate the brand has recently started selling film like Kodak 800, but not for the past ten years.its really kind of sad people have to insult others just because they don't like the / use the same camera or film.
lomo users expose film and a lot of it, and for a decade+ their film consumption has been a major reason
why film is still availble today.
Yes, the OP seems to enjoy posting links that promote controversy. I wonder does he live under a bridge and subsist upon goat?
Nor do I!I certainly don't mind the chance to state that Lomo people are daft!
I'm glad you know what Lomo people are. I am still trying to get a handle on that.I certainly don't mind the chance to state that Lomo people are daft!
I certainly don't mind the chance to state old while senile racist men are daft too. But that's just me living under a bridge eating goats.I certainly don't mind the chance to state that Lomo people are daft!
You know that's just large format users. Some people could pick a fight in an empty room.I certainly don't mind the chance to state old while senile racist men are daft too. But that's just me living under a bridge eating goats.
:-O
True colors. They show up, sooner or later.I certainly don't mind the chance to state old while senile racist men are daft too. But that's just me living under a bridge eating goats.
:-O
They certainly do on Photrio as well.True colors. They show up, sooner or later.
It doesn't. "Ignorant" means uninformed, unaware, lacking knowledge. I am ignorant of many things, but I am not ignorant of my ignorance. An aesthetic preference may denote poor or uneducated taste, but placing a value on defects in film, camera, etc. indicates ignorance of what that technology is capable of. Choosing, say, a meniscus lens to attain a certain "look" for an image is a valid decision and none of my business. Promoting lomography as a wonderful thing for film and film cameras is demonstrably false.
there is a value on defective film and cameras &c
it is not ignorant of what the medium is capable of, just the opposite.
one could easily say people who don't use defective film. cameras &c
are ignorant because they have no clue what these materials are capable of.
the idea that lomography hasn't been a great thing for film
and film cameras is anything but false. it has gotten people to use film
( even though they don't use it the way you and many others would like )
and lots of it ... and buy cameras, and chemicals
and photo paper, and use their local or mail order lab.
so are people who use things smaller than 8x10 ignorant as well ?
The irony is lost on you and your ilkHappy delusions!
Once again, true colors.The irony is lost on you and your ilk
At its best the Lomography company provides a few films that may have gone the way of the dodo, to people who would like to use it. At its worst it's selling instant creativity. As there's no such thing, I find it difficult to take the idea seriously. Buying any item of photographic equipment does not make one creative.
I think you either get Lomography or you don't. It's about having fun and not stressing about the technical side of photography (which may be why it's so difficult for a lot of people here to get their heads around!)
And like Anton Corbijn said, "For me, imperfection is perfection".
I certainly don't mind the chance to state old while senile racist men are daft too. But that's just me living under a bridge eating goats.
:-O
I think their lomo 800 c-41 film IS Kodak 800. It's just rebranded for them. LIke drug stores used to do.I keep hearing this, but is it true? How much mainstream film do, ahem, Lomographers use, and how can we tell? I appreciate the brand has recently started selling film like Kodak 800, but not for the past ten years.
I strongly suspect the claim that hipsters are solely responsible for keeping a medium oldies had given up on alive, is more than a little hyperbolic. In fact I'd go as far as to say if the supply of purple film and new toy cameras died up tomorrow, a site dedicated to the same stuff minus the marketing would probably take its place. They'd just use other brands.
That is the simplest part! Creativity does not obtain until the technique becomes reflex. It's rather hard to compose when one is wondering how to focus and expose correctly.
I think you either get Lomography or you don't. It's about having fun and not stressing about the technical side of photography (which may be why it's so difficult for a lot of people here to get their heads around!)
And like Anton Corbijn said, "For me, imperfection is perfection".
And those people are limited by their lack of technique. Just try to photograph the balance staff pivot of a watch (ca. .003" dia.) with a P&S.plenty of people use point and shoot or fixed focus cameras for creative purposes
as soon as they put film in them, and it doesn't seem to hamper their creative abilities.
usually they know they just point and shoot and there is no focusing involved.
the hardest part is usually loading the film.
New term for motor drive?Then you have clearly never used an 'action sampler'
And those people are limited by their lack of technique. Just try to photograph the balance staff pivot of a watch (ca. .003" dia.) with a P&S.
My point is that they can't! FFS!my guess is that someone with a p/s camera really doesn't want to photograph a balance staff pivot of a watch.
and it probably has nothing to do with lack of technique but lack of interest ...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?