NortheastPhotographic
Advertiser
We're looking at adding one of these next year: https://www.colenta.at/2025/wp-cont...-Datasheet-06-2022-20-BW-31-7Tank-ECO-V02.pdf
(Why do they make a model that does not have a stop bath tank? The dev times being so short, I think you'd want a true stop bath.)
Just curious about the Ilfotec RT developer requirement. We are doing everything now with replenished XTol (Actually Adox XT3) and a Jobo ATL2500. We use a water stop and Formulary TF5 fixer. I'm assuming it'll be less aesthetically pleasing than XTol, probably grainier? Is significantly worse? Similar to D76? I could live with that. Clayton F76+ was one that I decided was too harsh, and went back to XTol, for example. I've now come to see XTol as the developer on which all others should be evaluated. It's just so good. I've given up on the exotic formations in my personal work. I don't see any significant improvements over simple XTol. However, it just won't be possible to do RT with that so, Ilfotec RT it shall be.
We've had another big year at NP, with 30% sales growth over last year. I have about 25 years left of career time so I think next year will be a good time to solidify that future with a big, scary, investment in equipment. At one time I wanted to get the Colenta ROBOLINE dip and dunk model but I just don't think our space would allow for that sadly. Given that we currently run a 20" COLEX RT C41 machine, we're used to that process. It's actually kind of a conundrum because our Colex is currently working fine and we have a fair amount of small parts for it. It is still from 1994 though. It's also frankly a bit over sized for us. Having access to 6 processing lanes is amazing but just lifting the racks out for cleaning and maintenance can be a messy struggle. They're extremely heavy. As with everything, the electronics are as vulnerable as an Achilles heel. A few years ago Colex did tell me they could provide a new main board but, not sure how long that will last. Plus the entire thing wakes and sleeps based on a tiny little timer unit. If that thing goes down, you'd have to do some electrical work just to start the machine up! So, is it time to get an updated unit? It's a significant expense. How long do you decide to operate with general uncertainty?
Colenta currently makes 3 C41 RT machines. One is a 3 lane, 'rapid access' model. Rapid access is the chemistry used in minilabs. Dev-Bleach-Fix-Stab-Stab-Stab-Dry. Roughly 14m 30 seconds in the unit dry to dry. Second would be a traditional C41 3 lane model. Dev-Bleach-Wash-Fix-Wash-Stab, roughly 24 minutes in the machine. We currently run traditional C41 and we regenerate our bleach which offers significant cost savings over time, and presumably environmental upside as very little gets dumped. Three is nearly the same as the previous but it's 30cm instead of 20 so it adds a 4th lane and a different dryer design. Not sure why that dryer choices was made? (https://www.colenta.at/2025/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/30-C41-32-6-Tank-Pro.pdf) This unit is special order so it would take a few months to get one, we're in no rush. It would also be the least amount of step down for us since we only lose 2 lanes and our workflow remains constant. I've come to like the Fujiflim C41 chemistry quite a bit. You can see it in the scans, they take far fewer adjustments. This is the kind of thing that's not 'supposed' to be true, but just is.
So ideally I'd have a new Colenta C41 machine with 4 lanes and a 3 lane B&W machine. We could then scrub and clean the ATL2500 and resume doing 6 bath E6 with it, as Kodak/PhotoSys has released their 6 bath 5L kits. I also know for a fact that 3-4 new 'lab grade' scanners are coming soon so we will likely add the most robust of those options to replace our HS1800 which I spend most of my time on. That aforementioned scanner would be run by a new employee. So we'd have 1 studio manager, 1 Fuji Frontier Tech, 1 Noritsu HS1800 tech, Myself, who operates the new scanner and maintains the equipment, and theoretically a part timer who helps with shipping and other various tasks. That's the ideal set up anyway.
Would anyone like to commiserate with me on these difficult choices?
(Why do they make a model that does not have a stop bath tank? The dev times being so short, I think you'd want a true stop bath.)
Just curious about the Ilfotec RT developer requirement. We are doing everything now with replenished XTol (Actually Adox XT3) and a Jobo ATL2500. We use a water stop and Formulary TF5 fixer. I'm assuming it'll be less aesthetically pleasing than XTol, probably grainier? Is significantly worse? Similar to D76? I could live with that. Clayton F76+ was one that I decided was too harsh, and went back to XTol, for example. I've now come to see XTol as the developer on which all others should be evaluated. It's just so good. I've given up on the exotic formations in my personal work. I don't see any significant improvements over simple XTol. However, it just won't be possible to do RT with that so, Ilfotec RT it shall be.
We've had another big year at NP, with 30% sales growth over last year. I have about 25 years left of career time so I think next year will be a good time to solidify that future with a big, scary, investment in equipment. At one time I wanted to get the Colenta ROBOLINE dip and dunk model but I just don't think our space would allow for that sadly. Given that we currently run a 20" COLEX RT C41 machine, we're used to that process. It's actually kind of a conundrum because our Colex is currently working fine and we have a fair amount of small parts for it. It is still from 1994 though. It's also frankly a bit over sized for us. Having access to 6 processing lanes is amazing but just lifting the racks out for cleaning and maintenance can be a messy struggle. They're extremely heavy. As with everything, the electronics are as vulnerable as an Achilles heel. A few years ago Colex did tell me they could provide a new main board but, not sure how long that will last. Plus the entire thing wakes and sleeps based on a tiny little timer unit. If that thing goes down, you'd have to do some electrical work just to start the machine up! So, is it time to get an updated unit? It's a significant expense. How long do you decide to operate with general uncertainty?
Colenta currently makes 3 C41 RT machines. One is a 3 lane, 'rapid access' model. Rapid access is the chemistry used in minilabs. Dev-Bleach-Fix-Stab-Stab-Stab-Dry. Roughly 14m 30 seconds in the unit dry to dry. Second would be a traditional C41 3 lane model. Dev-Bleach-Wash-Fix-Wash-Stab, roughly 24 minutes in the machine. We currently run traditional C41 and we regenerate our bleach which offers significant cost savings over time, and presumably environmental upside as very little gets dumped. Three is nearly the same as the previous but it's 30cm instead of 20 so it adds a 4th lane and a different dryer design. Not sure why that dryer choices was made? (https://www.colenta.at/2025/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/30-C41-32-6-Tank-Pro.pdf) This unit is special order so it would take a few months to get one, we're in no rush. It would also be the least amount of step down for us since we only lose 2 lanes and our workflow remains constant. I've come to like the Fujiflim C41 chemistry quite a bit. You can see it in the scans, they take far fewer adjustments. This is the kind of thing that's not 'supposed' to be true, but just is.
So ideally I'd have a new Colenta C41 machine with 4 lanes and a 3 lane B&W machine. We could then scrub and clean the ATL2500 and resume doing 6 bath E6 with it, as Kodak/PhotoSys has released their 6 bath 5L kits. I also know for a fact that 3-4 new 'lab grade' scanners are coming soon so we will likely add the most robust of those options to replace our HS1800 which I spend most of my time on. That aforementioned scanner would be run by a new employee. So we'd have 1 studio manager, 1 Fuji Frontier Tech, 1 Noritsu HS1800 tech, Myself, who operates the new scanner and maintains the equipment, and theoretically a part timer who helps with shipping and other various tasks. That's the ideal set up anyway.
Would anyone like to commiserate with me on these difficult choices?

