I was stating a fact "Nikon no longer accept images for their international photographic competition on film",why they should care ? I don't know, but it's still a fact .
In 50 years, they're going to have take an electric airplane to find some place to fill me up with avgas.There are plenty of mint condition cameras available. As many go unsold (might have to do with the asking price...) I don't think there is anywhere enough unmet demand to justify starting up production of F6's, FM2's and their ilk.
If you get an excellent condition plain prism F2 it would probably see you and your great-grandchildren out. You may want to get a few spare F2's as parts cameras. Think of it like keeping an old car going - there's the car you drive and a couple of sacrificial parts cars under tarps out back. And bins of all the rubber parts - seals, mounts, bushings etc - in the basement.
Of course, where you are going to get 35mm film in 50 to 100 years is another matter. I suppose in 50 years you will have to take your old car to the airport to fill it up with avgas.
Just that is why Ben referred to that contest.Also it is [Nikon's] contest, there rules.
The question is whether or not Nikon feels there is money to be made from re-releasing the FM-2n/FE2 which would be my best guess for the most achievable film camera. I doubt they'd be able to keep it at the old price point (about 370.00 1999 NY price).
How many would sell if they bundled the choice of body with some of the more recent discontinued Ai-S lenses; one package would be the 28mm f/2.8, the 50mm f/1.4 and the 105mm f/2.5 and be say 2,000.00? Would you bite at 1500.00? How about bundled for the 'Low Light Street Shooter Package' Black FM-2n 24mm f/2, 35mm f/1.4 and 50mm f/1.2 for 1800.00?
I would think that if they could keep the Body Only price to be under 1,000 they'd sell 25,000 units worldwide, in 2 years, probably fairly easily.
There are easy ways to add EXIF data to images produced by film scans. But, again, not sure why they would care.
Edit: I don't see anything in the entry guidelines for the 2021 contest that prohibits film-based images from being submitted:
https://www.nikon-photocontest.com/assets/pdf/entry/EntryGuidelines_en.pdf
I was stating a fact "Nikon no longer accept images for their international photographic competition on film",why they should care ? I don't know, but it's still a fact .
Just that is why Ben referred to that contest.
Manufacturing a film camera, the same time excluding analog entries into ones contest is a statement.
When was the last time they accepted slide or print submissions? I have to imagine that it's been a while and that this isn't new for 2021.But this excludes photographers that only work analogy.
When was the last time they accepted slide or print submissions? I have to imagine that it's been a while and that this isn't new for 2021.
My recollection is that the rules also require that the photographer be able to supply the original RAW out of camera digital file if requested, which makes film "captures" problematic.I read these rules, and I read it as they don't care what the source is, "Image data files created with any device capable of taking still images [including digital cameras]" - it doesn't exclude non-digital cameras. But you have to submit the image in a digital form, so you have to scan the negative, slide, or you could presumably scan a print. Technically, this means they don't accept images on film, as in you can't mail them a slide. I can hardly blame them for that. They're probably not set up to mail your slide to the judges, either.
My recollection is that the rules also require that the photographer be able to supply the original RAW out of camera digital file if requested, which makes film "captures" problematic.
My recollection is that the rules also require that the photographer be able to supply the original RAW out of camera digital file if requested, which makes film "captures" problematic.
Getting replies to their post would be, um, awkwardWe should request that Photrio provide a service where an analog-only member can send them a post in a letter, and someone types it in to the forum for them.
And if one shoots JPG instead of RAW? I assume that's allowed, in which case it would be difficult to distinguish a JPG straight from the camera from a JPG produced by a scanned negative - if you do a good job spotting with the clone tool in Lightroom, that isMy recollection is that the rules also require that the photographer be able to supply the original RAW out of camera digital file if requested, which makes film "captures" problematic.
Yes, we discussed this already years ago.When was the last time they accepted slide or print submissions? I have to imagine that it's been a while and that this isn't new for 2021.
I am lost. I thought I was reading about Leica and there is only posts about some contest which I am not interested in. What happened to the Leicas?
Only 8 weeks passed since they were mentioned at the start of this thread.What happened to the Leicas?
Only 8 weeks passed since they were mentioned at the start of this thread.
I expect those 2 models still to be available.
Nikon got burnt hard when they re-released the S3 2000 (and S2 2005). They apparently lost money on that project, and now you can buy new/never used ones for less than what the retail was 20 years ago!
I certainly won't be around that long, neither will any of you. And most likely film won't be around in 8000 weeks.For the money they cost, they better be around for 8000 more weeks.
I certainly won't be around that long, neither will any of you. And most likely film won't be around in 8000 weeks.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?